This domain, caixageral.digital, is flagged as a high-risk generic phishing infrastructure designed to impersonate Caixa Geral Depósitos (CGD), a major Portuguese financial institution. The page title explicitly displays 'Caixa Geral Depósitos CGD,' indicating an intent to deceive customers into submitting sensitive credentials, such as login details or personal identification numbers. Analysis of the domain reveals no direct association with known drainer kits, but the use of a legitimate-looking SSL certificate and financial branding suggests a targeted credential harvesting campaign. Infrastructure analysis reveals the following technical indicators: the domain is registered through Name.com, Inc., and resolves to the IP address 35.157.26.135, hosted on Amazon.com, Inc. (AS16509) in Germany. The domain was created on June 17, 2026, an anomalous future date that may indicate registry manipulation or typosquatting. VirusTotal detection shows 2 out of 95 security vendors flagging the domain as malicious, while it appears on a single security blocklist and is currently blocked by PhishDestroy. No entries were found in Google Safe Browsing at the time of analysis. The domain remains active, posing an ongoing risk to CGD customers and general internet users. The use of a Let's Encrypt SSL certificate (YE1) enhances the appearance of legitimacy, increasing the likelihood of successful deception. Response actions should include immediate blacklisting by network security providers, takedown requests to the hosting provider (Amazon Web Services), and registrar-level suspension. Users are advised to avoid interacting with the domain, verify financial institution URLs through official sources, and enable multi-factor authentication to mitigate credential theft risks. The anomalous creation date and low detection rate suggest the infrastructure may evade automated defenses, requiring manual review for accurate threat classification.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Last analyzed Previous stored snapshot: 5 detections
alphaMountain.ai
CRDF
Forcepoint ThreatSeeker
Gridinsoft
SOCRadar
Registration & observation details1
Availability observations
Last reachable observation
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='caixageral.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionEr
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
