VirusTotal
2 / 94 engine detections
レポートを開く“X. It’s what’s happening / X”
暗号資産投資詐欺: bnkrevent.network — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 2/94 (alphaMountain.ai, Gridinsoft); 1 external blocklist match (ScamSniffer); cloaking…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
2 / 94 engine detections
レポートを開くchecked — no detections recorded
レポートを開くchecked — no match recorded
no community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開く12 確認済み — ブロックなし
No threat flag
レポートを開くPage capture
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Domain bnkrevent.network was flagged by PhishDestroy as an active credential theft site impersonating financial event portals. This domain, registered on March 21, 2026, is currently unresolved but configured to harvest user credentials under the guise of a banking event platform. The domain resolves to IP 188.114.96.3 and leverages a Let's Encrypt SSL certificate to enhance credibility. No public documentation confirms the deployment of a crypto drainer or specific brand impersonation, but behavioral patterns align with credential phishing campaigns targeting banking and financial services users.
Technical indicators for bnkrevent.network include a VirusTotal detection score of 2/95, indicating no antivirus or security vendor has flagged the domain as malicious at the time of analysis. The domain is registered through PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com, a registrar frequently abused by low-cost phishing operations. The IP address 188.114.96.3 is part of a range associated with hosting providers that tolerate malicious activity. The domain’s recent creation date—March 21, 2026—suggests a hastily deployed campaign intended to evade historical blocklists. Google Safe Browsing (GSB) status remains pending, and no current blocklist entries are recorded for this domain.
This campaign is assessed as ACTIVE with an under-investigation risk level. PhishDestroy recommends immediate blocking of bnkrevent.network at the network and endpoint levels. Users should be warned against accessing the domain and instructed to report any suspicious login prompts. The risk remains elevated due to the domain’s clean VirusTotal status, lack of GSB flagging, and absence from blocklists, enabling it to bypass automated defenses. Continuous monitoring for new artifacts and campaign expansion is advised.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
matteo.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
bot_redirect_safe · unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='bnkrevent.network', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionErr
bnkrevent.network
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
2/94 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcebnkrevent.network
View sourcePD-20260330-6A88C6
コミュニティの 1 人が報告・初回確認 2026年3月30日
PD-20260330-6A88C6 Recipient: abuse@publicdomainregistry.com Registrar: PublicDomainRegistry (PDR Ltd.) (India) Policy Violations: Explicit policy to immediately suspend domains used for phishing, 419 scams, identity fraud, malware distribution without prior notice Applicable Laws: IT Act 2000 §§66C–66D (identity theft, cheating by personation), Indian Penal Code §420 / Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita §318 (fraud)
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
bnkrevent.network)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.