This domain, blueflipdelivery.online, is under investigation for fraudulent activity linked to a delivery scam operation. Registered on February 21, 2026, through Global Domain Group LLC, the domain resolved to the IP address 163.61.188.5, hosted under AS153568 (NEW DHAKA HARDWARE) in the United States. The page title, 'Blue Flip Delivery Company – Courier Delivery Company,' suggests an attempt to impersonate a legitimate courier service, though no specific brand mimicry has been confirmed in available data. The domain is currently offline, and its SSL certificate is classified as R13, a detail that may warrant further scrutiny for potential irregularities.
Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain uses nameservers 5772.ns1.abovedomains.com and 5772.ns2.abovedomains.com, a configuration that has been observed in other low-reputation domains. It appears on one security blocklist, as flagged by PhishDestroy, indicating prior suspicion of malicious intent. While the domain was scanned by 93 vendors on VirusTotal, none currently flag it as malicious; however, the absence of detections does not confirm legitimacy. Defenders should treat this domain as high-risk pending further evidence, particularly given its association with a known scam type and its abrupt takedown.
Organizations are advised to monitor for any resurgence of activity under this domain or related infrastructure, particularly IP 163.61.188.5 and the associated nameservers. If the domain reactivates, immediate blocking and deeper forensic analysis of its hosting environment are recommended. No concrete evidence of payload delivery or victim interaction has been identified in the available data, leaving the full scope of the operation uncertain.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月29日score 48/1001 brand signal
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:08:02 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinecurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCfirst terminal observation: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
