blucollective.shop presents itself as a women’s clothing boutique, using the brand name Blue Bungalow in its title. It is a fake online shop aimed at consumers looking for apparel. PhishDestroy first recorded the domain on 2026-10-18. The site is still alive and returns a reachable redirect as of 2026-10-19.
How the scam works
Visitors see a storefront titled “Women's Clothing Boutique & Online Store | Blue Bungalow AU”, which mimics a legitimate retailer. The checkout flow asks for name, address, email and credit‑card details, which are captured and sent to the operators. No actual merchandise is shipped, resulting in financial loss and identity theft. The site likely uses a generic e‑commerce kit to harvest data.
Evidence
VirusTotal scans flagged the domain by 2 of 92 engines, including alphaMountain.ai and Gridinsoft. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and specifically marked the page as a fake shop. PhishDestroy added the domain to its blocklist and OTX has three pulses referencing it. No additional listings from Google Safe Browsing or Spamhaus were reported.
Infrastructure
Registration details are not publicly available. The site is hosted on IP 188.244.119.43, operated by Malakmadze Web LLC in Georgia. TLS certificates are issued by YE1.
What to do
For anyone who entered personal or payment information, contact the card issuer immediately, monitor bank statements and consider a credit freeze. Change any passwords used on the site and enable two‑factor authentication where possible. Security teams should block the domain at the DNS and firewall level, add it to web‑filter lists, and monitor for related phishing attempts.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年10月18日score 81/1003 brand signals
Submitted URLhttp://blucollective.shop/
Favicon Hash
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Latest HTTP observationRedirectingHTTP redirect observed80%2026-10-20 10:00:20 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-20 10:00:20 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
