PhishDestroy's automated assessment classifies blacksheephq.shop as an impersonation phishing page. The site was first seen by PhishDestroy on 2026-10-17, showing the recorded title “Performance Apparel by Black Sheep | Black Sheep”.
How the scam works
Impersonation phishing pages copy the look and branding of legitimate businesses to trick visitors into entering login credentials, personal data or payment information. Victims who submit such data may have accounts compromised or be defrauded.
Evidence
VirusTotal scanned the domain on 2026-10-11 and reported 3 detections out of 92 engines, flagged by alphaMountain.ai, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar. Google Safe Browsing checked on 2026-10-19 did not flag the site, while urlscan captured on 2026-10-17 marked it malicious and labeled it as a “fakeshop”. PhishDestroy lists the domain internally as malicious; external blocklists returned zero matches, Spamhaus DBL showed no listing, and OTX recorded four pulses referencing the domain as of 2026-10-19.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered on 2026-07-23 through Dynadot Inc., 86 days before its first sighting. The recorded hosting IP is 5.255.61.74, belonging to Malakmadze Web LLC in Georgia, and the TLS certificate issued by Let’s Encrypt / YE2 was observed on 2026-10-17.
What to do
Users should avoid entering any credentials or payment details on the site and report the URL to the legitimate brand and to phishing‑remediation services. Security teams should add the exact domain to block or monitoring lists, review access logs for any connections, and ensure that any compromised credentials are reset.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年10月17日score 81/1003 brand signals
Submitted URLhttp://blacksheephq.shop/
Favicon Hash
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 22:48:18 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 02:30:34 UTClast content: 2026-10-19 02:30:34 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-10-19 20:22:27 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-10-19 02:30:34 UTC → 2026-10-19 20:22:27 UTC · 17.86hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-10-19 11:26:30 UTC · precision medium · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
