The domain bitcoin-eg-plan.online was registered on May 27, 2026 through NameCheap, Inc. and is hosted on a Google Cloud server located in the United States (IP 34.111.179.208). DNS resolution uses the registrar‑provided nameservers dns1.registrar-servers.com and dns2.registrar-servers.com, and the MX records point to eforward1.registrar-servers.com, confirming that the domain relies on the registrar's default infrastructure. An active HTTPS service is present, secured by a Let’s Encrypt certificate (issuer E7), and the web server returns HTTP 200 responses. The page title observed is "كريبتو جولد — استثمار بيتكوين", indicating an attempt to associate the site with Bitcoin investments. Security telemetry shows a Gridinsoft trust score of 0/100 and three of ninety‑one VirusTotal scanners flag the domain as malicious. The domain is listed on three public blocklists and is actively blocked by PhishDestroy, MetaMask, and SEAL, reinforcing its classification as a brand‑impersonation threat targeting Bitcoin users. While the site content has not been fully analysed, the combination of registrar‑default hosting, low trust scores, multiple security vendor detections, and blocklist presence provides strong evidence of malicious intent. Defenders should continue to block the domain at network perimeters, monitor for DNS queries to the associated nameservers, and update endpoint protection feeds to include the observed indicators of compromise. Further investigation of the landing page content is recommended to determine any credential‑harvesting or payment‑redirect mechanisms that may be present.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Evidence layersAvailability: Content servingContent: Content served at rootDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationコンテンツ公開中Ordinary HTTP content served90%2026-10-19 22:27:07 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 22:35:30 UTClast content: 2026-10-19 22:27:07 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
