VirusTotal
8 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く“BitBridges • Home”
フィッシング: bitbridges.online — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 8/89 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, CyRadar, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet); Spamhaus…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
8 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開くDBL_SPAM
4 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
bitbridges.online presents itself as BitBridges, with a homepage titled "BitBridges • Home". PhishDestroy classifies it as an impersonation phishing page built to look like a legitimate crypto bridging service and to catch users who want to transfer assets across chains. We first flagged it on 2026-08-09. As of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving its content.
Bridge-themed impersonation pages copy the look and wording of a real service so visitors trust it enough to act. The usual next step is a prompt to connect a wallet, sign a transaction or send funds to start a transfer. Whatever the victim sends or authorizes goes to the operators, and the promised tokens on the other chain never arrive. Because bridge transactions are irreversible and often involve large sums, a single interaction can empty a wallet.
On 2026-09-23, 8 of 89 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, CyRadar, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar and Webroot. Those vendors use independent detection methods, so their agreement carries weight even though most engines have not caught up. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as spam, and it appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses alongside the PhishDestroy blocklist.
The domain was registered on 2026-07-05 through Fewmoretaps OU d/b/a Trustname.com and was detected 35 days later. That short gap is typical of throwaway domains set up for a single campaign. The site runs on Contabo GmbH servers in France at 89.117.51.233. Its Let's Encrypt certificate gives it a browser padlock, which shows the connection is encrypted but says nothing about whether the site is honest.
Do not connect a wallet to bitbridges.online or send it any funds. If you already connected, use a token approval checker to revoke any permissions you granted, and move remaining assets to a fresh wallet if you signed anything you did not understand. If you entered a seed phrase, assume the wallet is compromised and transfer everything out right away. Defenders should block the domain and the 89.117.51.233 address, and report it to the registrar and hosting provider.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
aryanna.ns.cloudflare.commail.bitbridges.onlinepriority 10Location describes the IP network.
48c032ff6ddd237dda7246cf34f7051ad38f4da082a3df430e7d1257569a8413Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of bitbridges.online · checked Aug 10, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
bitbridges.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
4→5
2→4
到達可能
4 community references
View source8/89 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcebitbridges.online
View sourceコミュニティ報告:1 件
カテゴリOTHER_INVESTMENT_SCAM
Data submited by Intelligence for good
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
bitbridges.online)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.