ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@rashost.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 7 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
bellavitaluxuryco.shop poses as the official store of Bella Vita Luxury, a perfume brand. Its page title, "Luxury Perfumes for Men & Women | Bella Vita Luxury Fragrance Gift Sets | BELLAVITA LUXURY", is written to catch people searching for the brand's gift sets. PhishDestroy first detected it on 2026-10-13 and classifies it as an impersonation phishing page. On 2026-10-19 the site was still online with its storefront content live.
How the scam works
Fake brand shops copy the look and product catalogue of a real retailer and add a ".shop" domain with a small spelling twist, here an extra "co", so the address looks plausible at a glance. Shoppers are drawn in with discounted fragrance sets, then asked for their name, delivery address, phone number and card details at checkout. The usual outcome is that money is charged and nothing arrives, or a cheap substitute is sent. The card and personal data can also be reused for further fraud.
Evidence
urlscan.io rated the site malicious and specifically flagged it as a fake shop. On 2026-10-17, VirusTotal showed 8 of 92 engines flagging it: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, LevelBlue, SOCRadar and Webroot. That count is modest, but these are independent vendors that agree with each other. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as spam, and it appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered through Dynadot Inc. on 2026-04-12, six months before PhishDestroy detected it. That gap suggests the domain was held in reserve or ran unnoticed for a while. The site is hosted on the Malakmadze Web LLC network in Georgia, far from the brand it imitates. Its Let's Encrypt certificate only gives it the padlock icon and says nothing about whether the shop is legitimate.
What to do
If you paid on this site, call your card issuer right away. Report the charge as fraud, ask for a chargeback and have the card replaced. Watch your statements for further unauthorised transactions, and expect phishing calls or messages that use the name, address and phone number you entered. Reach Bella Vita only through channels you have verified yourself. Security teams should block the domain, add it to web and email filters, and flag lookalike ".shop" domains that use the Bella Vita name.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年10月13日score 88/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://bellavitaluxuryco.shop/
Favicon Hash
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Evidence layersAvailability: Content servingContent: Content served at rootDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationコンテンツ公開中Ordinary HTTP content served90%2026-10-19 22:43:43 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 22:43:43 UTClast content: 2026-10-19 22:43:43 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Recorded subdomains1
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
img.bellavitaluxuryco.shopDomain record
The original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
使用技術 · 1 identified
H
HTTP/3
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
