ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@netim.net.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
amorimheritagegroup.digital presents itself as the official website of Amorim Heritage Group, which it pitches as a premium AI offering. The heritage-group name and polished branding are designed to win the trust of people looking for an AI-driven product or investment. PhishDestroy classifies it as an impersonation phishing page and first flagged it on 2026-08-28. As of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving its content.
How the scam works
The page title, amorim heritage group | a premium AI | Official Website, frames the site as the authentic home of an established group with cutting-edge technology. Sites built this way present an official-looking front so that visitors hand over contact details, account credentials or payments, believing they are dealing with the real company. AI branding is a common hook in these schemes because it makes unusual returns or exclusive access sound plausible. Victims can lose any money they send and any personal data they enter, and their details can be reused for follow-up fraud.
Evidence
On 2026-09-12, 17 of 89 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain. That is a meaningful minority, and the flags come from vendors that run independent detection, including alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, CyRadar, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker and Fortinet. The domain also appears in five AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so other researchers have tracked it separately. PhishDestroy lists it on its blocklist.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered on 2026-06-21 through NETIM SAS, about ten weeks before PhishDestroy detected it. That gap fits a site prepared in advance and then promoted. It is hosted on 185.62.58.129 in the Netherlands. Its ZeroSSL domain-validated certificate only proves control of the domain name, so the browser padlock says nothing about who runs the site.
What to do
Do not register, log in or send money through this site. If you paid anything, contact your bank or card issuer immediately and ask about a chargeback. Refuse any later request for fees or taxes to release funds. If you created an account, change that password everywhere you reused it and turn on two-factor authentication. Expect targeted phishing calls or emails that use the details you entered. Defenders should block the domain and its IP and alert users who may be interested in AI investment offers.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年10月9日score 98/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttps://amorimheritagegroup.digital/
Favicon Hash
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Certificate fingerprintaca2947d09f3e03cb498ae049b5ef7b341b92b8d692528dd340b3f926b87bf48Certificate names · 1 SANs
amorimheritagegroup.digital
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Evidence layersAvailability: Content servingContent: Content served at rootDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationコンテンツ公開中Ordinary HTTP content served90%2026-10-21 22:39:27 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-21 22:39:27 UTClast content: 2026-10-21 22:39:27 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
使用技術 · 3 identified
J
jsDelivr
CDN
JSDelivr is a free public CDN for open-source projects. It can serve web files directly from the npm registry and GitHub repositories without any configuration.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
