ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@rashost.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 17 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
alvarpet.shop is an impersonation phishing page dressed up as the online store of Alvar Pet, a dog food brand. Its page title, "Alvar Pet | Tailored to your dog's needs | Natural ingredients | Alvar Pet", copies the brand's marketing language to win over dog owners shopping for pet food. PhishDestroy first detected it on 2026-10-03. When last checked on 2026-10-19, the domain still responded, but its DNS was no longer serving the shop's content.
How the scam works
The site copies a real pet food brand's storefront so that shoppers believe they are ordering from Alvar Pet. Victims pick products, often tempted by discounts, and enter their name, address and payment card details at checkout. The money goes to the operators and no order arrives. The card data and personal details collected along the way can be reused for further fraud. urlscan.io classified the page as a fake shop, which matches this pattern.
Evidence
Seven of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain as of 2026-10-06: alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Gridinsoft, Netcraft and SOCRadar. That is a modest count, but it comes from several independent vendors, including Netcraft, which specialises in brand fraud. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and separately tagged the site as a fake shop. The domain appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses and is listed on the PhishDestroy blocklist.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered through Dynadot Inc. on 2026-07-03, exactly three months before PhishDestroy caught it, so it may have been taking orders for weeks before anyone flagged it. It is hosted on 62.233.61.69, in a network registered to Malakmadze Web LLC of Georgia, with the server geolocated in the US. The site uses a free Let's Encrypt certificate, so the padlock in the browser says nothing about whether the shop is genuine.
What to do
If you paid on alvarpet.shop, contact your card issuer or bank right away, report the charge as fraud, request a chargeback and ask for a replacement card. Watch your statements for unfamiliar transactions. Treat any later emails or texts about your "order" as follow-up scams. If you reused a password from an account you created there, change it wherever else you use it. Security teams should block the domain and its IP, add it to brand-abuse and fake-shop filters, and alert Alvar Pet so it can pursue takedown and warn its customers.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年10月9日score 88/1002 brand signals
Submitted URLhttp://alvarpet.shop/
Favicon Hash
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 22:38:42 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-09 22:41:12 UTClast content: 2026-10-09 02:26:52 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-10-10 20:20:48 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-10-09 22:41:12 UTC → 2026-10-10 20:20:48 UTC · 21.66hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-10-10 09:31:00 UTC · precision medium · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
使用技術 · 1 identified
H
HTTP/3
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
