VirusTotal
6 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“OpenClaw AI — Solana Token Analytics”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@globaldomaingroup.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 3 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Solanaなりすまし: ai-openclaw.digital — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 302). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 6/91 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
6 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く5 threat-system alerts
レポートを開くDBL_PHISH
4 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hagezi Threat Feed | ai-openclaw.best |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| DNS4EU | ai-openclaw.best |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| DigiCert UltraDNS | ipfs.io |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| Hagezi Threat Feed | ai-openclaw.digital |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| DNS4EU | ai-openclaw.digital |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain, ai-openclaw.digital, is confirmed as an active phishing site with a high-risk classification. Registered on June 26, 2026, through Global Domain Group LLC, it currently resolves to the IP address 104.21.27.141. Analysis indicates that 5 of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal have flagged this domain as malicious, suggesting a pattern consistent with phishing infrastructure. The domain's creation date aligns with recent phishing campaigns, and its naming convention (incorporating 'ai' and 'claw') may be designed to mimic cloud-based or AI-related services, though the exact brand or service being impersonated has not been confirmed. Defenders should treat this domain as hostile. Block DNS resolution to 104.21.27.141 for all internal assets and monitor for any outbound connections to this IP or domain. Given the high-risk status and active resolution, assume any interaction with this domain could lead to credential theft or malware delivery. No specific phishing kit or payload has been identified in available intelligence, so further analysis of network traffic or endpoint logs may be required to determine the full scope of the threat. The domain remains active as of July 19, 2026, and should be prioritized for immediate containment.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
dakota.ns.cloudflare.comholly.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
bc9f75c97280e9b051db3e4201fd8d15ee964db12dddafa274be833d2f0a3b98Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of ai-openclaw.digital · checked Jul 19, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
ai-openclaw.digital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
4 community references
View source6/91 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260719-ADA394
No threat flag
View sourceai-openclaw.digital
View sourcePage captured
View source保存された類似ドメイン:118 件
118 件中 100 件を表示
PD-20260719-ADA394 Recipient: abuse@globaldomaingroup.com アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
ai-openclaw.digital)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.