VirusTotal
3 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“ADEN - Decentralized Perpetual Contracts”
WalletConnectフィッシング: aden.exchange — 未検証. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 3/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft); 1 external blocklist match…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
3 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く24 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
aden.exchange is flagged as a critical crypto‑drainer infrastructure. The domain was registered through Dynadot LLC on 1 September 2025 and remains active. It resolves to the Cloudflare‑owned address 188.114.96.3 (AS13335, United States). The SSL certificate is issued by Let’s Encrypt (R12) and the site returns an HTTP 301 redirect, indicating a deliberate forwarding step. Technology fingerprints show Google Web Server, enforced HSTS, and HTTP/3 support, consistent with modern hosting on Cloudflare. The page title “ADEN – Decentralized Perpetual Contracts” suggests a fabricated DeFi offering, and the scam type is identified as wallet/seed phishing using a Wallet Connect abuse kit, which is commonly employed to harvest private keys and seed phrases.
Two of ninety‑five VirusTotal scanners flagged the domain, and the Gridinsoft trust score is 0 / 100, reinforcing the malicious assessment. The domain is listed on two public blocklists and is actively blocked by PhishDestroy and ScamSniffer. Nameservers are donald.ns.cloudflare.com and hera.ns.cloudflare.com, confirming Cloudflare DNS control. The intelligence indicates the operator is impersonating the brand “Across”, although the site does not expose any Across branding beyond the name reference. No public samples of the delivered payload or victim reports have been released, so the exact method of credential capture remains uncertain.
However, the presence of a Wallet Connect abuse kit strongly implies that any user who connects a wallet through the presented interface may have their private keys intercepted or redirected to an attacker‑controlled address. Defenders should add 188.114.96.3 to network‑level deny lists, enforce DNS blocking for aden.exchange, and monitor for anomalous Wallet Connect calls from internal clients. Threat‑intel platforms should flag any outbound traffic to the domain’s IP or to known wallet‑draining endpoints associated with the kit.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
donald.ns.cloudflare.comhera.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
442dcb58603623d007bb257a5406b18b66c9d0efaf194b9212e5150c3119fa65Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of aden.exchange · checked Mar 6, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
bot_redirect_safe · unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='aden.exchange', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("
aden.exchange
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
redirected→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
利用不可→到達可能
不明→inactive
parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page
不明→inactive
parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page
不明→inactive
parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page
到達可能→利用不可
利用不可→到達可能
到達可能→利用不可
No threat flag
View source24 community references
View source3/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceaden.exchange
View sourceコミュニティの 1 人が報告・初回確認 2025年12月18日
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
このドメインを操作したり、個人情報を入力したり、暗号通貨ウォレットに接続したりした場合は、直ちに行動を起こしてください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
推定では $51 billion 2024年に違法な暗号資産ウォレットへと流出した(source). もしあなたが aden.exchange — 今すぐ行動しましょう。
Wallet-specific steps below apply if you connected a wallet, signed a transaction, or exposed a wallet secret.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
によると、 FBI、最も重要な詳細はトランザクションデータです:
0x5856...35985)aden.exchange)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.