VirusTotal
7 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く“ACLER | Womens Ready To Wear Fashion | Acler | Acler”
フィッシング: aclerhq.shop — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 7/89 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, LevelBlue, Netcraft); URLQuery 1 alert…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
7 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く1 threat-system alert
レポートを開く悪意あり
レポートを開く4 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS4EU | aclerhq.shop |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
aclerhq.shop is a fake online shop that copied the identity of Acler, a women's ready-to-wear fashion label. Its page title read "ACLER | Womens Ready To Wear Fashion | Acler | Acler". The "hq" suffix and the cheap .shop extension were meant to pass as an official outlet. It targeted women shopping for designer clothing online. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-09. The site has been offline since 2026-09-15, and its DNS was still inactive when we checked on 2026-10-19.
Stores like this copy a real label's product photos, collections and branding, then list items at steep discounts to push quick checkouts. Victims pay by card or another method and either receive nothing or get a cheap item that looks nothing like the listing. Victims lose the purchase price. They also hand over their name, address, phone number and card details, which can be reused for fraud or sold. Shops built this way usually last only a few days before the domain is abandoned, which matches this site going dark less than a week after we spotted it.
On 2026-09-10, VirusTotal showed 7 of 89 engines flagging the domain: alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, LevelBlue, Netcraft, SOCRadar and Webroot. A modest count like this is typical for a fake shop caught early, and several of these vendors specialize in commerce fraud. urlscan.io independently rated the page malicious and tagged it specifically as a fake shop. The domain also appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses and on the PhishDestroy blocklist.
The domain resolved to 212.52.28.142 on the network of Malakmadze Web LLC. That provider is registered in Georgia, but the address geolocated to the United States. The site used a free Let's Encrypt certificate, so the padlock in the browser only meant the connection was encrypted. It said nothing about whether the store was legitimate. With DNS now inactive, the domain no longer points anywhere.
If you ordered from aclerhq.shop, contact your bank or card issuer right away. Report the transaction as fraud, request a chargeback, and ask for the card to be replaced. Watch your statements for unfamiliar charges. Be wary of follow-up emails or texts about "delivery problems" that ask for more payment or personal details. If you reused a password from an account you created on the shop, change it everywhere else. To buy from Acler, go to the label's own website or an authorized retailer instead of following ads or search results. Defenders should block the domain and its IP and add the Acler brand to lookalike-domain monitoring, since copycat shops often reappear under new names.
bradley.ns.cloudflare.comlana.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
40ba81889167ab0860e81f0abaf865616e3ade1df484ecfb80ab0ec361365a43aclerhq.shopSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of aclerhq.shop · checked Sep 9, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
利用不可→到達可能
到達可能→利用不可
6→7
5→6
0→5
到達可能
No threat flag
View source4 community references
View source7/89 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260909-70064C
aclerhq.shop
View sourcePage captured
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
aclerhq.shop
PD-20260909-70064C Recipient: abuse@rashost.com アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
aclerhq.shop)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.