VirusTotal
4 / 95 engine detections
レポートを開く“Ace Data Cloud | Airdrop”
暗号資産ウォレットドレイナー: acedata.network — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 4/95 (ADMINUSLabs, ESET, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score 85/100. レジストラ: Cloudflare.
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
4 / 95 engine detections
レポートを開くno community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain acedata.network is flagged as a high‑risk crypto drainer. Infrastructure analysis shows the domain is hosted on Cloudflare’s network (ASN 13335) and resolves to IP 104.21.41.219, a location attributed to the United States. The authoritative name servers are amos.ns.cloudflare.com and dayana.ns.cloudflare.com, confirming the use of Cloudflare’s DNS service. No TLS certificate was observed, indicating the site did not serve HTTPS. VirusTotal records indicate that four of ninety‑five scanned scanners flagged the domain, and Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of zero out of one hundred, both suggesting malicious intent. The domain appears on a single public blocklist and is explicitly blocked by the PhishDestroy service.
Content‑level indicators reveal that the page title returned by the site is “Ace Data Cloud | Airdrop”, and the scam type is listed as wallet/seed phishing. The operation employs a Solana‑specific drainer kit, and the phishing kit is identified as an “Airdrop Scam”. The actor claims to impersonate the brand “across”, though the page title does not reference that brand directly. Registration information shows the domain was provisioned through Cloudflare, Inc., which aligns with the observed hosting infrastructure. Defenders should treat any traffic to acedata.network as hostile.
Because the site is currently offline, dynamic analysis is not possible, but the static indicators are sufficient to block the domain at network perimeter, DNS, and endpoint layers. Update URL filtering, threat intelligence, and intrusion‑prevention signatures to include the observed IP address and the domain name. Monitor for new sub‑domains or DNS changes that point to Cloudflare IP ranges, and consider correlating logs for attempts to exfiltrate Solana wallet seeds or other cryptocurrency credentials. The absence of an SSL certificate does not mitigate the threat; the primary risk is credential harvesting via the deployed Solana drainer kit.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
https://t.me/ace_tokenStored page referenceIoC extraction recorded 2026-08-02 04:24:26 UTC
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
amos.ns.cloudflare.comdayana.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='acedata.network', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError
acedata.network
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/372eaaec-6920-4beb-8c98-324d46245e68
No threat flag
View sourcePage captured
View source4/95 engine detections
View sourceacedata.network
View source保存された類似ドメイン:118 件
118 件中 100 件を表示
コミュニティの 1 人が報告・初回確認 2025年11月21日
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
このドメインを操作したり、個人情報を入力したり、暗号通貨ウォレットに接続したりした場合は、直ちに行動を起こしてください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
推定では $51 billion 2024年に違法な暗号資産ウォレットへと流出した(source). もしあなたが acedata.network — 今すぐ行動しましょう。
Wallet-specific steps below apply if you connected a wallet, signed a transaction, or exposed a wallet secret.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
によると、 FBI、最も重要な詳細はトランザクションデータです:
0x5856...35985)acedata.network)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.