Motori di sicurezza che segnalano un rilevamento: 2. Blocklist pubbliche che segnalano una corrispondenza: 1. Prestare estrema cautela: non inserire credenziali o informazioni personali.
This domain is flagged as an elevated-risk crypto wallet drainer phishing site targeting Russian-speaking users. Analysis of the infrastructure indicates it was designed to mimic legitimate wallet verification services, likely to siphon cryptocurrency from victims under the guise of a "comprehensive wallet check." Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain cft.report was registered on March 14, 2026, through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, and resolved to the IP address 87.236.16.177. It is currently blocked by two security blocklists and flagged by 4 out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal. The site employed PHP, Vue.js, Nginx, and third-party libraries such as Unpkg, jsDelivr, and FingerprintJS, which are commonly abused to facilitate client-side attacks. The SSL certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt, a low-friction provider often leveraged by malicious actors to lend superficial legitimacy. The page title, "CFT.Report — Комплексная проверка кошельков," directly translates to a service offering wallet verification, a known pretext for crypto drainer schemes. Mitigation against this threat type requires heightened vigilance when interacting with wallet verification prompts. Users should avoid connecting wallets to unverified platforms, particularly those advertised via unsolicited links or social engineering. Browser-based security extensions that block known malicious domains should be enabled, and wallet software should be configured to require explicit confirmation for high-risk transactions. Organizations should update blocklists to include this domain and its associated IP, while monitoring for similar infrastructure patterns, such as domains registered through the same registrar or resolving to the same hosting provider. Given the domain's current offline status, further monitoring is advised to detect potential re-emergence under a different name or IP.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Accountability draft
Nulla viene inviato automaticamente.
Network & certificates
Stored technical evidence
Network & DNS
Resolved IP
87.236.16.177
Network ASN
AS198610
Organization
Beget LLC
Observed location
Saint Petersburg, RU
Server header
nginx-reuseport/1.21.1
Nameserver 1
ns1.beget.com
Location describes the IP network.
Certificato TLS
Issuer
Let's Encrypt
Valid from
2026-01-28 06:40:25
Valid until
2026-04-28 06:40:24
Hostname coverage
Certificate hostname mismatch
Validity
Stored certificate expired
Collection time
2026-03-15 05:48:38 UTC
Collection source
PhishDestroy collector
Certificate fingerprintb0cc60965bd308717fee82e7f0bd79225893a7fa9307d41dab2d68379cf712b0Certificate names · 1 SANs
www.cft.report
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Evidence layersAvailability: Content servingContent: Content served at rootDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationContenuto attivoOrdinary HTTP content served90%2026-10-20 10:06:45 UTC
RDAP registrationSconosciuto
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-20 10:06:45 UTClast content: 2026-10-20 10:06:45 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Recorded subdomains1
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.cft.reportDomain record
The original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Tecnologie · 6 identified
P
PHP
Programming languages
Server-side scripting language designed for web development.
V
Vue.js
JavaScript frameworks
Progressive JavaScript framework for building user interfaces.
N
Nginx
Web serversReverse proxies
High-performance HTTP server and reverse proxy, known for stability and low resource usage.
U
Unpkg
Fast CDN for everything on npm — serves raw files from npm packages.
J
jsDelivr
CDN
Free public CDN for open-source projects, serving files from npm and GitHub.
Le relazioni archiviate sono raggruppate in base all'attributo di corrispondenza esatta. Un fornitore o un registrar condiviso da solo non dimostra la proprietà comune.
Mappa delle infrastrutture · cft.report
Ogni riga rappresenta un motivo per cui un dominio è collegato a questo host. I nodi a dimensione intera indicano rilevamenti di VirusTotal, mentre quelli tratteggiati sono già offline. Di seguito è riportato l'elenco completo.
Risultati corrispondenti4
Stesso hash della favicon o stesso titolo della pagina di questo host.
Registrati tramite lo stesso registrar. Un registrar serve milioni di clienti non collegati tra loro, quindi questo dato indica semplicemente un raggruppamento piuttosto che dimostrare un nesso.
5 evidence signal groups linked0 stored notification recordsAmmantato · raggiungibile
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
If credentials were compromised, report immediately. Do not engage with recovery scammers.
Se hai inserito credenziali dell'account, informazioni personali o di pagamento oppure hai scaricato un file da questo dominio, agisci immediatamente. Di seguito sono riportate le risorse per aiutarti a segnalare l'incidente e proteggerti.
Attenzione ai truffatori che promettono il recupero dei fondi! I criminali possono contattare nuovamente le vittime fingendo di essere investigatori, avvocati o agenti di recupero. Non pagare commissioni anticipate né condividere credenziali.Scopri di più sulle frodi relative ai sussidi di recupero →
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Bozza assistita dall'intelligenza artificiale: i dettagli dell'incidente vengono elaborati dal fornitore di intelligenza artificiale · Controllalo e invialo tu stesso
After a phishing incident
Raccomandazioni e consigli per le vittime
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Cosa devo fare subito?
Urgente
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Modifica tutte le password — e-mail, account Exchange, qualsiasi servizio che utilizzi la stessa password
Abilita l'autenticazione a due fattori (2FA) utilizzando un'app di autenticazione (non via SMS). Disattiva il recupero tramite SMS
Carte congelate se hai inserito i tuoi dati bancari sul sito di phishing
Quali informazioni devo raccogliere per la mia relazione?
Linee guida dell'FBI
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Date e orari esatti — di ogni transazione e del primo contatto con il truffatore
Schermate — siti web truffaldini, messaggi in chat, e-mail, transazioni tramite portafoglio digitale, social media
Tutti gli URL e i domini utilizzato dal truffatore (tra cui cft.report)
Comunicazioni — e-mail, SMS, numeri di telefono, nomi utente utilizzati dal truffatore
Anche se non conosci tutti i dettagli — sporgere comunque denuncia. Anche le informazioni parziali sono comunque utili alle indagini.
A chi devo segnalare la truffa?
FBI IC3 — Internet Crime Complaint Center (sistema di segnalazione federale degli Stati Uniti)
Europol — Segnalazioni relative alla criminalità informatica in Europa (UE)
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
Polizia locale — crea un documento ufficiale, anche se non è in grado di agire immediatamente
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
How do phishing scams typically work?
Siti web fasulli — cloni perfetti, al pixel, di siti legittimi con domini leggermente modificati
Macellazione dei suini — fiducia conquistata nel corso di settimane tramite Telegram/WhatsApp/app di incontri, per poi rubare i soldi
Truffe legate al recupero dei fondi — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
Truffe basate sull'intelligenza artificiale — i deepfake, il phishing automatizzato e i siti generati dall’intelligenza artificiale rendono più difficile individuare le frodi
Come posso proteggermi in futuro?
Aggiungi i siti ufficiali ai preferiti — Non cliccare mai sui link contenuti nelle e-mail, nei messaggi diretti o negli annunci pubblicitari
Verifica i domini — controllare PhishDestroy prima di interagire. Verifica l'HTTPS, l'ortografia e l'età del dominio
"Troppo bello per essere vero" = truffa — rendimenti garantiti, testimonial di personaggi famosi, scadenze urgenti
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(LT)
