Motori di sicurezza che segnalano un rilevamento: 4. Blocklist pubbliche che segnalano una corrispondenza: 3. Prestare estrema cautela: non inserire credenziali o informazioni personali.
PhishDestroy has identified an active generic phishing domain named basics-wordprompt.online that is masquerading as a legitimate writing-prompt service while serving malicious JavaScript designed to steal cryptocurrency and sensitive credentials. The domain exhibits red-flag behaviors consistent with modern drainer kits, including dynamic content loading and rapid redirection chains, which are designed to evade traditional security layers. No overt brand impersonation has been confirmed at this stage, suggesting the operators are leveraging a self-contained lure rather than hijacking a well-known brand identity. This domain was flagged by PhishDestroy on receipt of telemetry indicating active distribution of a cryptocurrency-draining payload. Technical indicators include a VirusTotal detection score of 4/95 at time of analysis, registration through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, resolution to IP 88.223.84.140, and issuance of a Let’s Encrypt SSL certificate. The domain was created on May 07, 2026, and currently shows no presence on Google Safe Browsing lists or any of the major public blocklists queried, indicating a very recent launch window and minimal historical abuse signaling. The absence of detections on VirusTotal underscores the importance of behavioral monitoring and sandbox analysis when evaluating newly observed domains. As of this report, basics-wordprompt.online remains active and continues to resolve to its assigned infrastructure. PhishDestroy has escalated the domain to Tier-2 abuse desks at HOSTINGER and Let’s Encrypt for takedown, and has shared IOCs with leading threat-intelligence platforms to accelerate propagation across security vendor ecosystems. The current risk level is classified as under_investigation to reflect the ongoing verification of payload hashes and C2 endpoints, but users should treat any interaction with this domain as hostile until definitive remediation is confirmed. Users who may have entered credentials or connected wallets while on this domain are urged to revoke permissions immediately via their wallet’s dApp browser or settings panel and to monitor for anomalous transactions.
Cosa conteggiamo
Tempo trascorso dalla prima segnalazione di abuso archiviata alla prima osservazione che il contenuto non era disponibile. Ciò non ne stabilisce la causa.
Cosa contiene ogni rapporto
I record archiviati dei report in uscita possono fare riferimento a prove disponibili in quel momento, come verdetti dei fornitori, dati di registrazione, dettagli di hosting, classificazioni o screenshot. Questa pagina non deduce l'esatto carico utile consegnato, la ricevuta, la conferma o l'azione da parte di un destinatario.
Dettagli tecniciProvenance & timestamps
Rilevato per la prima volta07/05/2026
Submitted URLhttp://basics-wordprompt.online/
ID del caso
ICANN OVERSIGHT
Accreditamento e contesto RAA
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Accountability draft
Nulla viene inviato automaticamente.
Network & certificates
Stored technical evidence
Network & DNS
Resolved IP
88.223.84.140
Network ASN
AS47583
Organization
UAB INIT
Observed location
Boston, US
Server header
LiteSpeed
Nameserver 2
lunar.dns-parking.com
solar.dns-parking.com
Location describes the IP network.
Certificato TLS
Issuer
Let's Encrypt / R13
Valid from
2026-05-07 07:22:01
Valid until
2026-08-05 07:22:00
Hostname coverage
Certificate hostname mismatch
Validity
Stored certificate expired
Collection time
2026-05-07 14:00:07 UTC
Collection source
PhishDestroy collector
Certificate fingerprint097e4e82fdbff97c2008e4a0be4ee59efbe5d1f38df65df584c4be899535142dCertificate names · 1 SANs
www.basics-wordprompt.online
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS inattivoreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationSconosciutoProbe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:11:38 UTC
RDAP registrationSconosciuto
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-06-13 22:36:16 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-06-13 22:36:16 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 2,609.64hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-07 07:25:35 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Recorded subdomains1
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.basics-wordprompt.onlineDomain record
The original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of basics-wordprompt.online· checked May 28, 2026
60
Needs Work
Performance
FCP
6.92s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
6.92s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
0ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
6.92s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good50-89 Needs Work0-49 Poor
Registration & observation details8
Availability observations
Last reachable observation
Outcome first observed
Observation window starts
Observation window ends
Estimated change time
Observation window · hours
2609.64
Estimate basis
Bounded by observations
Estimate precision
very_low
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='basics-wordprompt.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnec
basics-wordprompt.online
Stored observation history12
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Le relazioni archiviate sono raggruppate in base all'attributo di corrispondenza esatta. Un fornitore o un registrar condiviso da solo non dimostra la proprietà comune.
Mappa delle infrastrutture · basics-wordprompt.online
Ogni riga rappresenta un motivo per cui un dominio è collegato a questo host. I nodi a dimensione intera indicano rilevamenti di VirusTotal, mentre quelli tratteggiati sono già offline. Di seguito è riportato l'elenco completo.
Risultati corrispondenti4
Stesso hash della favicon o stesso titolo della pagina di questo host.
Registrati tramite lo stesso registrar. Un registrar serve milioni di clienti non collegati tra loro, quindi questo dato indica semplicemente un raggruppamento piuttosto che dimostrare un nesso.
5 evidence signal groups linked1 stored notification recordsContenuto non disponibile
If credentials were compromised, report immediately. Do not engage with recovery scammers.
Se hai inserito credenziali dell'account, informazioni personali o di pagamento oppure hai scaricato un file da questo dominio, agisci immediatamente. Di seguito sono riportate le risorse per aiutarti a segnalare l'incidente e proteggerti.
Attenzione ai truffatori che promettono il recupero dei fondi! I criminali possono contattare nuovamente le vittime fingendo di essere investigatori, avvocati o agenti di recupero. Non pagare commissioni anticipate né condividere credenziali.Scopri di più sulle frodi relative ai sussidi di recupero →
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Bozza assistita dall'intelligenza artificiale: i dettagli dell'incidente vengono elaborati dal fornitore di intelligenza artificiale · Controllalo e invialo tu stesso
After a phishing incident
Raccomandazioni e consigli per le vittime
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Cosa devo fare subito?
Urgente
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Modifica tutte le password — e-mail, account Exchange, qualsiasi servizio che utilizzi la stessa password
Abilita l'autenticazione a due fattori (2FA) utilizzando un'app di autenticazione (non via SMS). Disattiva il recupero tramite SMS
Carte congelate se hai inserito i tuoi dati bancari sul sito di phishing
Quali informazioni devo raccogliere per la mia relazione?
Linee guida dell'FBI
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Date e orari esatti — di ogni transazione e del primo contatto con il truffatore
Schermate — siti web truffaldini, messaggi in chat, e-mail, transazioni tramite portafoglio digitale, social media
Tutti gli URL e i domini utilizzato dal truffatore (tra cui basics-wordprompt.online)
Comunicazioni — e-mail, SMS, numeri di telefono, nomi utente utilizzati dal truffatore
Anche se non conosci tutti i dettagli — sporgere comunque denuncia. Anche le informazioni parziali sono comunque utili alle indagini.
A chi devo segnalare la truffa?
FBI IC3 — Internet Crime Complaint Center (sistema di segnalazione federale degli Stati Uniti)
Europol — Segnalazioni relative alla criminalità informatica in Europa (UE)
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
Polizia locale — crea un documento ufficiale, anche se non è in grado di agire immediatamente
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
How do phishing scams typically work?
Siti web fasulli — cloni perfetti, al pixel, di siti legittimi con domini leggermente modificati
Macellazione dei suini — fiducia conquistata nel corso di settimane tramite Telegram/WhatsApp/app di incontri, per poi rubare i soldi
Truffe legate al recupero dei fondi — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
Truffe basate sull'intelligenza artificiale — i deepfake, il phishing automatizzato e i siti generati dall’intelligenza artificiale rendono più difficile individuare le frodi
Come posso proteggermi in futuro?
Aggiungi i siti ufficiali ai preferiti — Non cliccare mai sui link contenuti nelle e-mail, nei messaggi diretti o negli annunci pubblicitari
Verifica i domini — controllare PhishDestroy prima di interagire. Verifica l'HTTPS, l'ortografia e l'età del dominio
"Troppo bello per essere vero" = truffa — rendimenti garantiti, testimonial di personaggi famosi, scadenze urgenti
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
