VirusTotal
13 / 95 engine detections
Apri il rapporto“Coinbase Deposit • Bank Transfer”
Imitazione di Coinbase: basepay.services — Contenuto non disponibile. Riepilogo delle prove: VirusTotal 13/95 (ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender…
L’analisi dettagliata di PhishDestroy AI resta in inglese per preservare il rapporto forense originale.
13 / 95 engine detections
Apri il rapportoThreat flag recorded
Apri il rapportono community references
Apri il rapportoprovider verdict: clean
Apri il rapportoPage capture
Apri il rapportoResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis indicates that the domain basepay.services was registered on December 4 2025 through the HOSTINGER operations, UAB registrar. The authoritative name servers are ns1.dns-parking.com and ns2.dns-parking.com, both typical of parked or parking‑service providers. DNS resolution returns a single IPv6 address 2a02:4780:45:4282:ffbc:43a5:3cb8:fd68, which belongs to AS47583 Hostinger International Limited and geolocates to Germany. No TLS certificate is presented, meaning the site would be served over plain HTTP or an invalid HTTPS connection, a common characteristic of fraudulent landing pages. The page title retrieved from the site reads “Coinbase Deposit • Bank Transfer”, directly referencing the Coinbase brand and suggesting a crypto‑related deposit flow.
Google Safe Browsing has classified the domain as a social engineering threat, and PhishDestroy has added it to its blocklist. Additional reputation services report a Gridinsoft trust score of zero out of one hundred and the domain appears on a single security blocklist. VirusTotal analysis shows that thirteen of ninety‑five scanned scanners flagged the domain, reinforcing the malicious assessment. The observed indicators collectively point to a high‑risk crypto scam that impersonates Coinbase to lure victims into a fraudulent deposit process. The site is currently offline, which may be the result of takedown actions or the operator’s own shutdown.
Uncertainty remains regarding the exact payload delivered, the presence of any credential‑stealing forms, or whether the domain was used in a broader campaign. Defenders should continue to block the domain at perimeter filters, monitor for any residual traffic to the associated IPv6 address, and update detection rules to include the observed page title and host‑header patterns.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.dns-parking.comns2.dns-parking.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='basepay.services', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionErro
basepay.services
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Sconosciuto→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Sconosciuto→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Sconosciuto→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Sconosciuto→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Sconosciuto→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Sconosciuto→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Sconosciuto→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Sconosciuto→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Sconosciuto→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/ae552a04-7cab-40ea-932f-537b7e68ecec
Page captured
View sourceThreat flag recorded
View source13/95 engine detections
View sourcebasepay.services
View source255 domini simili memorizzati
Visualizzati 100 di 255
Segnalato da 1 membro della comunità; prima osservazione il 05/12/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Se hai inserito credenziali dell'account, informazioni personali o di pagamento oppure hai scaricato un file da questo dominio, agisci immediatamente. Di seguito sono riportate le risorse per aiutarti a segnalare l'incidente e proteggerti.
Seleziona il tuo Paese per ottenere contatti ufficiali del crimine informatico o creare una bozza di reclamo →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
basepay.services)Anche se non conosci tutti i dettagli — sporgere comunque denuncia. Anche le informazioni parziali sono comunque utili alle indagini.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analisi delle minacce utilizzando blocklist archiviate, WHOIS, DNS e prove di scansione pubblica
Scansiona oraSegnala i domini sospetti al nostro database delle minacce — proteggi la comunità
SegnalaSegnalazioni recenti di phishing e modifiche osservate della disponibilità
MonitoraControlla le minacce in tempo reale oppure contesta questa segnalazione se ritieni che si tratti di un falso positivo
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.