VirusTotal
3 / 89 engine detections
Buka laporan“Vote 0x88...9062 — pons”
Domain dalam daftar blokir: pons-voting-xo.netlify.app — Konten tidak tersedia (HTTP 404). Ringkasan bukti: VirusTotal 3/89 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint…
Analisis terperinci PhishDestroy AI di bawah tetap berbahasa Inggris untuk menjaga catatan forensik asli.
3 / 89 engine detections
Buka laporanno community references
Buka laporanprovider verdict: clean
Buka laporanNo threat flag
Buka laporanNo malicious flag
Buka laporanResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
pons-voting-xo.netlify.app is an impersonation phishing page dressed up as a Pons voting portal. Its page title, "Vote 0x88...9062 — pons", frames a wallet address as a ballot item to attract crypto users who expect to take part in a community vote. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-09-15. The site went offline on 2026-09-16 and was still dead with an empty root when last checked on 2026-10-19.
Fake voting pages use governance as the lure. A visitor sees what looks like a pending vote on a specific address and is asked to connect a wallet to cast a ballot. The "vote" is actually a request to sign a message or approve a transaction. That signature or approval can let the operator move tokens or other assets out of the wallet. A real-looking address in the title adds credibility, because it makes the vote seem specific and on-chain.
Wallet-security blocklists back the classification. MetaMask and SEAL both list the site alongside PhishDestroy, and these are the lists most likely to warn a user at the moment of connecting a wallet. Generic URL scanners flagged it less often. On 2026-09-17, VirusTotal showed only 3 of 89 engines flagging it: alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker and VIPRE. That low count reflects how briefly the page was live, not a clean bill of health.
The operator did not register a domain and used a free Netlify subdomain instead. This setup costs nothing and can be deployed in minutes, and this page lasted roughly a day between detection and going offline. Traffic was served from Amazon.com, Inc. infrastructure in Germany. The DigiCert certificate is Netlify's platform-wide certificate, so the padlock in the browser said nothing about who was behind the page.
If you connected a wallet to this page, check which approvals and signatures you granted, and revoke any token allowances you do not recognise using a reputable approval-management tool. If you signed anything and still hold assets in that wallet, move them to a fresh wallet whose seed phrase has never been exposed. If you typed in a seed phrase, treat the wallet as compromised and empty it immediately. Defenders should block the hostname and watch for similar voting-themed Netlify subdomains using the Pons name. Look-alike pages on free hosting platforms tend to reappear under slightly altered names.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
0x88ad8DdF1E3898412146a534538d418c6F8A9062Format validated · Domain analysisIoC extraction recorded 2026-09-16 04:00:22 UTC
Last checked
Reputasi Edge-IP tidak dikaitkan dengan domain ini.
Location describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of pons-voting-xo.netlify.app · checked Sep 15, 2026
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
pons-voting-xo.netlify.app
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Tidak diketahui→inactive
http_no_content
Tidak diketahui→inactive
http_no_content
Tidak diketahui→inactive
http_no_content
Tidak diketahui→inactive
http_no_content
Tidak diketahui→inactive
http_no_content
Tidak diketahui→inactive
http_no_content
Tidak diketahui→inactive
http_no_content
Tidak diketahui→inactive
http_no_content
Tidak diketahui→inactive
http_no_content
0→3
Dapat dijangkau→Tidak tersedia
No threat flag
View source3/89 engine detections
View sourcepons-voting-xo.netlify.app
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Jika Anda memasukkan kredensial akun, informasi pribadi atau pembayaran, atau mengunduh file dari domain ini, segera ambil tindakan. Di bawah ini adalah sumber daya untuk membantu Anda melaporkan insiden tersebut dan melindungi diri Anda sendiri.
Pilih negara Anda untuk mendapatkan kontak resmi kejahatan dunia maya, atau membuat draf pengaduan →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
pons-voting-xo.netlify.app)Meskipun kamu belum mengetahui semua detailnya — tetap saja ajukan laporan. Informasi yang tidak lengkap tetap dapat membantu penyelidikan.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analisis ancaman menggunakan daftar blokir yang disimpan, WHOIS, DNS, dan bukti pemindaian publik
Pindai SekarangLaporkan domain yang mencurigakan ke basis data ancaman kami — lindungi komunitas
LaporanLaporan phishing terbaru dan perubahan ketersediaan yang diamati
PantauPantau ancaman secara langsung atau ajukan keberatan terhadap daftar ini jika Anda yakin ini merupakan false positive
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.