Google Safe Browsing
No threat flag
Not on Google threat lists at check time
“OnChnia”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is complaint@gname.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 4 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
No threat flag
Not on Google threat lists at check time
Berbahaya
Browser scan with screenshot
0
threat pulses mention the domain
Online · HTTP 200
Cloudflare · 188.114.96.1
Each check shows its own collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety.
Peniruan Aave: onchnia.asia — Terakhir diketahui aktif (HTTP 200). Ringkasan bukti: VirusTotal 0/92; URLScan malicious verdict; Google Safe Browsing flagged…
Analisis terperinci PhishDestroy AI di bawah tetap berbahasa Inggris untuk menjaga catatan forensik asli.
Suspicious
Buka laporanThreat flag recorded
Buka laporanBerbahaya
Buka laporan0 / 92 engine detections
Buka laporanScan report
Buka laporan4 community references
Buka laporanResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
onchnia.asia is an impersonation phishing page that presents itself as "OnChnia", styled as a crypto investment service. It targets cryptocurrency holders and people looking for trading or yield opportunities. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-10-16, one day after the domain was registered. As of 2026-10-19 the site was alive and still serving its scam content.
Sites like OnChnia borrow the look and vocabulary of legitimate on-chain platforms to appear trustworthy, then steer visitors toward "investing" or depositing crypto. Scans of the site flag it as both an investment scam and a crypto scam. Victims are typically shown inflated balances or promised returns, then told to deposit more or pay fees before they can withdraw, and the funds never come back. Some versions also prompt users to connect a wallet or enter account credentials, which gives the operators a direct path to the victim's assets.
urlscan.io rates the site malicious and tags it with the investmentscam and cryptoscam brand categories. The domain is listed on the PhishDestroy, MetaMask and SEAL blocklists, and it appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses. VirusTotal showed 0 detections out of 92 engines on 2026-10-17. That absence of antivirus flags is common for newly registered scam domains, and it does not mean the site is safe.
The domain was registered on 2026-10-15 through GNAME.COM PTE. LTD. It resolves to 188.114.96.3 on Cloudflare, Inc. network space, with the country recorded as CA, so the origin server is likely hidden behind Cloudflare's proxy. The site uses a TLS certificate issued by Let's Encrypt (YE2). The padlock in the browser shows only that the connection is encrypted, not that the site is legitimate.
Do not deposit funds or pay any "withdrawal fee" on this site. If you entered a password or email, change it everywhere you reused it and enable two-factor authentication. If you connected a wallet or signed anything, revoke the approvals you granted using a token-approval checker, and move remaining assets to a fresh wallet. If you sent funds, keep your transaction hashes and report the loss to your local authorities and the exchange you used. Security teams should block the domain at DNS and proxy level and report it to Cloudflare and the registrar.
Last checked
Reputasi Edge-IP tidak dikaitkan dengan domain ini.
amy.ns.cloudflare.comcleo.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
98a684c0eb43f952ec363f940d5af799f2d25eb78b32c468eacd393d8fd03f59Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of onchnia.asia · checked Oct 16, 2026
Timestamped response metadata retained by the local collection pipeline. Each value below belongs to the displayed archive time.
http://onchnia.asia/https://onchnia.asia/Content-Type: text/htmlServer: cloudflareCF-Cache-Status: DYNAMICContent-Encoding: gziph3=":443"; ma=86400DYNAMICa4b97b462b50067e-EWRkeep-alivegziptext/htmlFri, 16 Oct 2026 19:31:03 GMTThu, 15 Oct 2026 01:26:45 GMT{"report_to":"cf-nel","success_fraction":0.0,"max_age":604800}{"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800,"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=oWY0vwYpZ2%2B%2FcDaXxktuu8%2BnB4uIzWVnEBmsUnnbF6McCNAXRRCkmbfQlDPA3I6f2FYTuOwcjY%2B81R88TZC31jr78nwXR8gOR%2B1ZCU6jqev75jkQ4%2B5CPX6TqCVTJuM%3D"cloudflarecfCacheStatus;desc="DYNAMIC"chunkedaccept-encodingValues retained by the collector; long values may be shortened during collection.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
No flag recorded→Flag recorded
Tidak diketahui→live_content
content_served
Tidak diketahui→live_content
content_served
Tidak diketahui→live_content
content_served
Threat flag recorded
View source4 community references
View source0/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261016-A210B4
Page captured
View sourceonchnia.asia
View source95 domain serupa tersimpan
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
onchnia.asia
PD-20261016-A210B4 Recipient: complaint@gname.com Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
Jika Anda memasukkan kredensial akun, informasi pribadi atau pembayaran, atau mengunduh file dari domain ini, segera ambil tindakan. Di bawah ini adalah sumber daya untuk membantu Anda melaporkan insiden tersebut dan melindungi diri Anda sendiri.
Pilih negara Anda untuk mendapatkan kontak resmi kejahatan dunia maya, atau membuat draf pengaduan →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
onchnia.asia)Meskipun kamu belum mengetahui semua detailnya — tetap saja ajukan laporan. Informasi yang tidak lengkap tetap dapat membantu penyelidikan.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analisis ancaman menggunakan daftar blokir yang disimpan, WHOIS, DNS, dan bukti pemindaian publik
Pindai SekarangLaporkan domain yang mencurigakan ke basis data ancaman kami — lindungi komunitas
LaporanLaporan phishing terbaru dan perubahan ketersediaan yang diamati
PantauPantau ancaman secara langsung atau ajukan keberatan terhadap daftar ini jika Anda yakin ini merupakan false positive
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.