VirusTotal
8 / 89
SignalerEngine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
“Pump”
Assessment based on the stored source evidence below. Review sources →
pumpz.top — Contenu indisponible. Usurpation de l'identité de la marque : Blast; Type d'arnaque : Crypto Drainer. Résumé des preuves: VirusTotal 8/89 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Emsisoft, Fortinet, Gridinsoft); URLQuery 1 alert; URLScan malicious verdict; 3 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, ScamSniffer, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 100/100. Bureau d’enregistrement: NameSilo.
L’analyse détaillée de PhishDestroy AI reste en anglais afin de préserver le relevé forensique original.
These are dated observations, not a live safety check. No flag, a stored capture, or a completed analysis does not establish that a site is safe.
8 / 89
SignalerEngine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
1 threat-system alert
SignalerAlerts refer to the preserved scan. They do not describe the current state of the site.
malicious
SignalerThis is the recorded automated analysis. Completion alone is not a safety verdict.
3 external matches
DétailsA result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
4 community references
SignalerCommunity publication references, not a vendor verdict or evidence of a common operator.
provider verdict: clean
A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
rapport stocké
View stored capture ↗ SignalerA preserved page image documents what the collector received; a capture is not a safety verdict.
Checked; no threat flag recorded
SignalerA result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS4EU | pumpz.top |
malicious | Sinkholed |
AI-assisted analysis Stored narrative · generated . Provider checks below retain their own observation dates. This narrative is an interpretation of collected evidence, not an independent source verdict.
Stored evidence for pumpz.top: VirusTotal recorded 8 detections among 89 scanners on 2026-09-07. That ratio reproduces the stored check in its original units and is not converted into another measure. MetaMask and SEAL appear as named external blocklist observations for pumpz.top. Each item in this report remains at the scope supplied by its dated source record.
VirusTotal records 8 detections among 89 scanners in the stored snapshot dated 2026-09-07. The numerator describes scanners that produced detections, while the denominator describes scanners included in that check. The reverse order would materially alter the stored result. The VirusTotal snapshot dated 2026-09-07 supplies no common rationale covering the included scanners, and this report adds none. A later VirusTotal snapshot may contain different values, so any comparison should preserve the exact ratio and date of each snapshot.
MetaMask and SEAL are recorded as named external blocklist observations for pumpz.top in the snapshot dated 2026-09-07. The stored MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records supply names and entries, but they supply no shared method or common rationale. PhishDestroy’s catalogue also contains pumpz.top as a publisher record. That PhishDestroy record is counted separately from the MetaMask and SEAL external blocklist observations. This separation keeps the origin of every entry visible and prevents a single stored item from being counted again under another source label.
The record first observed pumpz.top on 2026-09-07. The MetaMask and SEAL blocklist snapshot is dated 2026-09-07 and remains a separate event in the stored timeline. The registration date is separately recorded as 2026-09-04. A URLScan reference was stored on 2026-09-07 as a dated artifact for review. Each timestamp qualifies only the adjacent observation in this timeline. Later collection results should be compared with these dated values without replacing the earlier snapshot.
For pumpz.top, the registrar field records NameSilo, LLC; this is kept as an exact source value. The source stores 172.67.223.78 as the observed address in this record. The registration date for pumpz.top is recorded as 2026-09-04. The SSL issuer is recorded as Google Trust Services / WE1 in the snapshot dated 2026-09-07. The stored ASN observation records AS13335 and CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US in this record. The observed server header is recorded as cloudflare in this record. These fields preserve registration, network, and certificate context stored in this record. The report preserves each label and number as a separate source value instead of combining them into an invented aggregate. Keeping the fields separate leaves every infrastructure value traceable to the record that supplied it.
The pumpz.top record states that VirusTotal recorded 8 detections among 89 scanners on 2026-09-07. MetaMask and SEAL remain named blocklist observations from the snapshot dated 2026-09-07. PhishDestroy remains a separate publisher catalogue entry in the stored record. For pumpz.top, the registrar field records NameSilo, LLC; this remains separate from the other source fields. The observed address field in this record contains 172.67.223.78. The supported conclusion is bounded to the exact stored observations for pumpz.top. Any statement beyond those source values would require additional dated material.
Avoid submitting sensitive information to pumpz.top during review. Use a known service address obtained separately from this report for any necessary access. Defenders can retain pumpz.top as an exact indicator and preserve relevant DNS, proxy, and endpoint records. Compare later VirusTotal snapshots and MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records with the dated values above instead of replacing them. Keep each later observation with its source date so changes remain visible during follow-up review. If a defensive rule is needed, keep its scope to pumpz.top. The stored record does not justify extending that rule to 172.67.223.78 or to other infrastructure records.
20 · datasets with records / 11 · not recorded
What this report contains, where it came from, and when it was collected. A retained record can be incomplete; collection status is separate from the threat assessment.
These checks have no retained result. This does not mean they passed or that a scan is running.
3 · external source matches
NameSilo, LLC · 172.67.223.78 · DNS, TLS and retained responses
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
La réputation Edge-IP n’est pas attribuée à ce domaine.
bailey.ns.cloudflare.compiotr.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
b4ed227917067c71a4ba4c2546744bb72dd1f525123cbe2aa2768ebc5b3d29afSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of pumpz.top · checked Sep 7, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Stored browser and crawler observations
Enregistrement des observations « crawler contre navigateur » pour cet hôte, ainsi qu'une vérification en temps réel des empreintes numériques pour les systèmes de répartition du trafic de type Keitaro.
Note relative à la numérisation: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='pumpz.top', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("SOCK
1 · outbound report records
172.67.223.78.Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→Inconnu
probe_inconclusive
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→Inconnu
probe_inconclusive
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→Inconnu
probe_inconclusive
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→Inconnu
probe_inconclusive
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→Inconnu
origin_unreachable · http_5xx
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→Inconnu
origin_unreachable · http_5xx
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→Inconnu
origin_unreachable · http_5xx
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Accessible→Indisponible
7→8
6→7
5→6
4→5
0→4
Accessible
21 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
Shared hosting, registrar records and related domains
Original reports, independent checks and evidence links
PD-20260907-788367 Recipient: abuse@nic.top Policy Violations: Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses Applicable Laws (US): 18 U.S.C. § 1343 - Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1030 - Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 15 U.S.C. § 45 - FTC Act (Deceptive Practices) Federal laws prohibit wire fraud, computer fraud, and deceptive business practices. Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
Recovery steps, reporting contacts and complaint drafts
Si vous avez saisi des informations d'identification de compte, des informations personnelles ou de paiement, ou téléchargé un fichier à partir de ce domaine, agissez immédiatement. Vous trouverez ci-dessous des ressources pour vous aider à signaler l'incident et à vous protéger.
Sélectionnez votre pays pour obtenir contacts officiels en matière de cybercriminalité ou créer un projet de plainte →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
pumpz.top)Même si vous ne disposez pas de tous les détails — déposer quand même une plainte. Même des informations partielles peuvent aider les enquêtes.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analyse des menaces à l'aide de listes de blocage stockées, de WHOIS, de DNS et de preuves d'analyse publique
Scanner maintenantSignalez les domaines suspects à notre base de données des menaces — protégez la communauté
SignalerRapports de phishing récents et changements de disponibilité observés
SurveillerSurveillez les menaces en temps réel ou signalez cette alerte si vous pensez qu'il s'agit d'un faux positif
Ce rapport présente les dernières preuves stockées disponibles pour PhishDestroy. Les horodatages sources sont affichés lorsqu'ils sont disponibles ; la disponibilité et les verdicts des fournisseurs peuvent changer après la collecte.
Le site capturé affichait le titre de la page “Pump” et usurpait peut-être l'identité de Blast.
Depuis 2026-09-07 14:44:03 UTC, pumpz.top avait des détections provenant des moteurs de sécurité 8.
Each source records a particular observation. A screenshot, an available website, or a result with no detections does not establish that a site is safe. Source results can change after they are collected.
Si vous pensez que cette liste est inexacte, déposer un recours. Pour en savoir plus sur notre méthodologie, visitez le Page FAQ.