VirusTotal
1 / 92 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapport“Musor Drop — от первого входа до получения скина”
Usurpation de Cs2: musordrop.ink — Dernier actif connu (HTTP 200). Résumé des preuves: VirusTotal 1/92 (Fortinet); URLScan capture; PhishDestroy score 81/100.…
L’analyse détaillée de PhishDestroy AI reste en anglais afin de préserver le relevé forensique original.
1 / 92 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapport4 community references
Ouvrir le rapportprovider verdict: clean
Ouvrir le rapportNo threat flag
Ouvrir le rapportPage capture
Ouvrir le rapportResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
PhishDestroy added musordrop.ink to its internal blocklist on 2026-10-21 after manual review. The recorded page title “Musor Drop — от первого входа до получения скина” describes a guide for obtaining CS2 skins. The intake assessment noted no impersonation of a known brand, credential request, seed‑phrase demand, or investment‑fraud claim.
Domains that advertise in‑game item drop services can be used to lure users into providing game account credentials, installing unwanted software, or following payment instructions. No such behavior was observed on the fetched page, so the specific risk remains speculative.
VirusTotal scanned the domain on 2026-10-21 and flagged it as suspicious with one detection out of 92 engines, Fortinet labeling it as spam. Google Safe Browsing checked on the same date and did not flag the site. urlscan captured the page on 2026-10-21; its machine‑learning engine gave a malicious score of 99, though the overall verdict was not malicious. OTX listed four pulses referencing musordrop.ink, and external blocklists contained no entries as of 2026-10-21. PhishDestroy’s internal blocklist marks the domain as listed.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-09 through NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. DNS resolution at the time of capture returned IP 188.137.249.164, which belongs to the Podaon SIA network in the Netherlands, and the site responded with HTTP 200 using Nginx, Priority Hints, PWA and Open Graph.
Visitors should not submit any game account credentials or download files from musordrop.ink; if credentials were entered, change the associated passwords immediately. Defenders should block the exact domain, monitor DNS queries for it, and review logs for connections to the recorded IP.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.zomro.netns2.zomro.runs3.zomro.comns4.zomro.sumail.musordrop.inkpriority 20Location describes the IP network.
dd157659a2d77831e88605b1c6f7c853ccb50c009d84f9d7418673645993dffdmusordrop.inkwww.musordrop.inkSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.musordrop.inkDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of musordrop.ink · checked Oct 21, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Accessible
4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source1/92 engine detections
View sourcemusordrop.ink
View sourcePage captured
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
musordrop.ink
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Si vous avez saisi des informations d'identification de compte, des informations personnelles ou de paiement, ou téléchargé un fichier à partir de ce domaine, agissez immédiatement. Vous trouverez ci-dessous des ressources pour vous aider à signaler l'incident et à vous protéger.
Sélectionnez votre pays pour obtenir contacts officiels en matière de cybercriminalité ou créer un projet de plainte →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
musordrop.ink)Même si vous ne disposez pas de tous les détails — déposer quand même une plainte. Même des informations partielles peuvent aider les enquêtes.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analyse des menaces à l'aide de listes de blocage stockées, de WHOIS, de DNS et de preuves d'analyse publique
Scanner maintenantSignalez les domaines suspects à notre base de données des menaces — protégez la communauté
SignalerRapports de phishing récents et changements de disponibilité observés
SurveillerSurveillez les menaces en temps réel ou signalez cette alerte si vous pensez qu'il s'agit d'un faux positif
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.