VirusTotal
3 / 91 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapportHameçonnage: lastdraftsec.online — Contenu indisponible. Résumé des preuves: VirusTotal 3/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Fortinet, SOCRadar); URLQuery 1 alert…
L’analyse détaillée de PhishDestroy AI reste en anglais afin de préserver le relevé forensique original.
3 / 91 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapport1 threat-system alert
Ouvrir le rapportDBL_SPAM
no community references
Ouvrir le rapportprovider verdict: clean
Ouvrir le rapportNo threat flag
Ouvrir le rapportNo malicious flag
Ouvrir le rapportResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS4EU | lastdraftsec.online |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis indicates that the domain lastdraftsec.online was registered through Namecheap Inc on June 09, 2026. The authoritative name servers are a.dnspod.com, b.dnspod.com, and c.dnspod.com, a configuration frequently observed in short‑lived malicious deployments because DNSPod services allow rapid updates and easy domain turnover. The domain resolves to the IPv4 address 158.94.211.169; no additional hosting details such as ASN or geographic location are disclosed in the available data. Reputation services have flagged the domain: PhishDestroy lists it as blocked, and it appears on one external security blocklist, indicating that at least one downstream filter has identified it as malicious.
VirusTotal reports that the domain was scanned by 91 antivirus and URL‑reputation engines, none of which generated a detection at the time of analysis. While the absence of detections does not constitute proof of safety, it suggests that the payload or landing page may be newly observed or employing evasion techniques that have not yet triggered signatures. No SSL/TLS certificate information, HTTP status codes, page title, or content snapshots are present, leaving the visual and functional characteristics of the site unknown.
Consequently, the primary evidence supporting a risk assessment consists of the recent creation date, the use of DNSPod name servers, the blocklist entries, and the classification as a generic phishing campaign. Defenders should consider proactively blocking lastdraftsec.online and its resolving IP address at perimeter and DNS filtering layers, monitoring for any related indicators of compromise, and updating detection rules to incorporate the observed infrastructure patterns. Continuous re‑evaluation is advised as additional telemetry, such as content hashes or observed payloads, becomes available.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
a.dnspod.comb.dnspod.comc.dnspod.comLocation describes the IP network.
5d262ed7b5c8f0c1fef2ce93d3d989fa60a6ae518e4ee344821517838e89e15aSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of lastdraftsec.online · checked Jul 31, 2026
Timestamped response metadata retained by the local collection pipeline. Each value below belongs to the displayed archive time.
https://lastdraftsec.online/Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8Cache-Control: no-storeContent-Encoding: gzipclearno-storegzip693882text/html; charset=utf-8Fri, 31 Jul 2026 17:47:52 GMTAccept-EncodingcaptchaValues retained by the collector; long values may be shortened during collection.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
lastdraftsec.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Accessible→Indisponible
Accessible
3/91 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260731-44BF68
No threat flag
View sourcePage captured
View sourcelastdraftsec.online
View sourcePD-20260731-44BF68 Recipient: abuse@omegatech.sc Registrar: Namecheap Inc (United States) Policy Violations: Domain Registration Agreement prohibits hacking, misuse of domain to conduct attacks, scam and fraudulent activities; AUP allows immediate suspension Applicable Laws: CFAA 18 U.S.C. §1030, Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. §1343, CAN-SPAM Act
Si vous avez saisi des informations d'identification de compte, des informations personnelles ou de paiement, ou téléchargé un fichier à partir de ce domaine, agissez immédiatement. Vous trouverez ci-dessous des ressources pour vous aider à signaler l'incident et à vous protéger.
Sélectionnez votre pays pour obtenir contacts officiels en matière de cybercriminalité ou créer un projet de plainte →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
lastdraftsec.online)Même si vous ne disposez pas de tous les détails — déposer quand même une plainte. Même des informations partielles peuvent aider les enquêtes.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analyse des menaces à l'aide de listes de blocage stockées, de WHOIS, de DNS et de preuves d'analyse publique
Scanner maintenantSignalez les domaines suspects à notre base de données des menaces — protégez la communauté
SignalerRapports de phishing récents et changements de disponibilité observés
SurveillerSurveillez les menaces en temps réel ou signalez cette alerte si vous pensez qu'il s'agit d'un faux positif
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.