VirusTotal
3 / 95 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapport“Hyperliquid Review | The #1 Guide to Zero-Gas Perpetual Trading”
Usurpation de Arbitrum: hyperliquid.review — Contenu indisponible. Résumé des preuves: VirusTotal 3/95 (Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar)…
L’analyse détaillée de PhishDestroy AI reste en anglais afin de préserver le relevé forensique original.
3 / 95 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapportno community references
Ouvrir le rapportprovider verdict: clean
Ouvrir le rapportNo threat flag
Ouvrir le rapportNo malicious flag
Ouvrir le rapportResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain hyperliquid.review is a confirmed phishing site engaged in brand impersonation targeting Arbitrum, a prominent cryptocurrency platform. It posed as a guide for 'zero-gas perpetual trading' under the false pretense of Hyperliquid, a scam type designed to deceive users into disclosing sensitive information or interacting with malicious smart contracts. As of the latest verification, hyperliquid.review has been taken offline, though it previously operated as an elevated-risk threat with no associated drainer kit detected.
Technical analysis reveals that hyperliquid.review was flagged by 3 of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal, including Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, and SOCRadar, while Gridinsoft assigned it a trust score of 0/100. The domain was registered through NameCheap, Inc. on November 25, 2025, and resolved to the IP address 162.0.217.157, hosted in the Netherlands under AS22612 (Namecheap, Inc.). It appeared on one security blocklist, PhishDestroy, and lacked an SSL certificate. The observed page title was 'Hyperliquid Review | The #1 Guide to Zero-Gas Perpetual Trading,' and its nameservers were dns1.namecheaphosting.com and dns2.namecheaphosting.com.
Users who interacted with hyperliquid.review should immediately revoke any token approvals granted to unknown contracts and consider transferring funds to a new wallet to mitigate potential risks. If credentials were entered, change passwords for all associated accounts and enable two-factor authentication. Report the domain to platforms such as Google Safe Browsing, PhishTank, or the impersonated brand’s official security channels to aid in takedown efforts and prevent further victimization.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns1.namecheaphosting.comdns2.namecheaphosting.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='hyperliquid.review', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionEr
hyperliquid.review
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/33bf2f39-81e8-4caa-9fa1-2d6f37d0abfd
No threat flag
View sourcePage captured
View source3/95 engine detections
View sourcehyperliquid.review
View source28 domaines ressemblants enregistrés
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Si vous avez saisi des informations d'identification de compte, des informations personnelles ou de paiement, ou téléchargé un fichier à partir de ce domaine, agissez immédiatement. Vous trouverez ci-dessous des ressources pour vous aider à signaler l'incident et à vous protéger.
Sélectionnez votre pays pour obtenir contacts officiels en matière de cybercriminalité ou créer un projet de plainte →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
hyperliquid.review)Même si vous ne disposez pas de tous les détails — déposer quand même une plainte. Même des informations partielles peuvent aider les enquêtes.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analyse des menaces à l'aide de listes de blocage stockées, de WHOIS, de DNS et de preuves d'analyse publique
Scanner maintenantSignalez les domaines suspects à notre base de données des menaces — protégez la communauté
SignalerRapports de phishing récents et changements de disponibilité observés
SurveillerSurveillez les menaces en temps réel ou signalez cette alerte si vous pensez qu'il s'agit d'un faux positif
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.