VirusTotal
4 / 92 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapport“flash.live â Travel, Booked at the Speed of Light”
Vol d’identifiants: flashlive.online — Dernier actif connu (HTTP 200). Résumé des preuves: VirusTotal 4/92 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker…
L’analyse détaillée de PhishDestroy AI reste en anglais afin de préserver le relevé forensique original.
4 / 92 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapport15/100
Ouvrir le rapport6 community references
Ouvrir le rapportprovider verdict: clean
Ouvrir le rapportNo threat flag
Ouvrir le rapportNo malicious flag
Ouvrir le rapportResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain flashlive.online was registered on July 04, 2026 through HOSTINGER operations, UAB and is currently resolved to the IPv4 address 86.38.243.134, which is allocated to AS47583 Hostinger International Limited in India. The site presents a page titled "flash.live — Travel, Booked at the Speed of Light" and returns HTTP status 200. Infrastructure analysis shows the domain is served with a Let’s Encrypt certificate (identifier YE1) and uses the parking nameservers artemis.dns-parking.com and hermes.dns-parking.com. Reputation data indicates a Gridinsoft trust score of 0 out of 100 and the domain appears on three security blocklists. It has been blocked by PhishDestroy, MetaMask, and SEAL, and two of ninety-one VirusTotal scanners flagged the domain as malicious. The threat is classified as credential phishing, and the risk level is high with the status marked as active. Defenders should treat flashlive.online as a confirmed phishing infrastructure, enforce network-level blocking, monitor DNS queries for the associated IP and nameservers, and consider adding the domain to internal threat feeds. Continued observation is advised to detect any changes in hosting or content, but current evidence supports immediate mitigation.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
artemis.dns-parking.comhermes.dns-parking.comLocation describes the IP network.
7423eca22070764d2588c80b7d1636b15eab1eba82d43ee4957d449d92014877www.flashlive.onlineSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.flashlive.onlineDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of flashlive.online · checked Jul 5, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=LiteSpeed
flashlive.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
Inconnu→live_content
content_served
4/92 engine detections
View source6 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourceflashlive.online
View sourcePage captured
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Si vous avez saisi des informations d'identification de compte, des informations personnelles ou de paiement, ou téléchargé un fichier à partir de ce domaine, agissez immédiatement. Vous trouverez ci-dessous des ressources pour vous aider à signaler l'incident et à vous protéger.
Sélectionnez votre pays pour obtenir contacts officiels en matière de cybercriminalité ou créer un projet de plainte →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
flashlive.online)Même si vous ne disposez pas de tous les détails — déposer quand même une plainte. Même des informations partielles peuvent aider les enquêtes.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analyse des menaces à l'aide de listes de blocage stockées, de WHOIS, de DNS et de preuves d'analyse publique
Scanner maintenantSignalez les domaines suspects à notre base de données des menaces — protégez la communauté
SignalerRapports de phishing récents et changements de disponibilité observés
SurveillerSurveillez les menaces en temps réel ou signalez cette alerte si vous pensez qu'il s'agit d'un faux positif
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.