VirusTotal
4 / 91 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapport“Airdrop Crypto”
Faux airdrop: duplicate-disabled-642.invalid — Contenu indisponible. Résumé des preuves: VirusTotal 4/91 (Chong Lua Dao, ESET, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky)…
L’analyse détaillée de PhishDestroy AI reste en anglais afin de préserver le relevé forensique original.
4 / 91 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapportno community references
Ouvrir le rapportprovider verdict: clean
Ouvrir le rapportNo threat flag
Ouvrir le rapportPage capture
Ouvrir le rapportResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of the domain www.airdropcrypto.net indicates a confirmed brand impersonation campaign targeting Adobe, classified as a fake airdrop scam. The domain was registered on June 6, 2021, through Name.com, Inc., and resolves to the IPv6 address 2a00:1450:4001:812::2013, hosted on Google LLC infrastructure (AS15169) in Germany. The SSL certificate is issued by Google Trust Services (WR3), a common pattern for domains leveraging Google-hosted services. The page title, 'Airdrop Crypto,' aligns with the identified phishing kit labeled 'Airdrop Scam,' suggesting the domain was designed to deceive users into engaging with fraudulent cryptocurrency distributions under the guise of an Adobe-related offer.
Detection metrics reveal limited but targeted blocking: the domain appears on one security blocklist and is flagged by PhishDestroy. VirusTotal reports four detections out of 95 security vendors, indicating moderate but not universal recognition of the threat. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0/100, further corroborating its malicious classification. Infrastructure analysis reveals the use of Name.com nameservers (ns1cmt.name.com, ns2gtx.name.com, ns3dkz.name.com, ns4lqx.name.com) and technologies such as Blogger, Java, Python, Bootstrap, OpenGSE, Cloudflare, OneSignal, and Modernizr, which are consistent with scalable phishing operations.
The domain is currently offline, though its historical activity and registration details remain relevant for threat correlation. Defenders should treat this domain as a confirmed impersonation vector, particularly for campaigns leveraging Adobe’s brand to propagate cryptocurrency scams. Monitoring for re-registration or similar domains under the same registrar or hosting provider is recommended. No additional evidence links or payload samples were provided in the available intelligence, limiting further technical attribution.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
https://t.me/AidropCriptoChannelStored page referenceIoC extraction recorded 2026-08-03 04:03:54 UTC
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1cmt.name.comns2gtx.name.comns3dkz.name.comns4lqx.name.comLocation describes the IP network.
08af4654aa7894b53ce99140c8e1017559c4757b4b60d6b6f080c5176eb28bb2Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of duplicate-disabled-642.invalid · checked Mar 2, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
4/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourceduplicate-disabled-642.invalid
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
duplicate-disabled-642.invalid
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Si vous avez saisi des informations d'identification de compte, des informations personnelles ou de paiement, ou téléchargé un fichier à partir de ce domaine, agissez immédiatement. Vous trouverez ci-dessous des ressources pour vous aider à signaler l'incident et à vous protéger.
Sélectionnez votre pays pour obtenir contacts officiels en matière de cybercriminalité ou créer un projet de plainte →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-642.invalid)Même si vous ne disposez pas de tous les détails — déposer quand même une plainte. Même des informations partielles peuvent aider les enquêtes.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analyse des menaces à l'aide de listes de blocage stockées, de WHOIS, de DNS et de preuves d'analyse publique
Scanner maintenantSignalez les domaines suspects à notre base de données des menaces — protégez la communauté
SignalerRapports de phishing récents et changements de disponibilité observés
SurveillerSurveillez les menaces en temps réel ou signalez cette alerte si vous pensez qu'il s'agit d'un faux positif
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.