VirusTotal
2 / 95 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapport“DappsTools”
Hameçonnage de phrase de récupération: duplicate-disabled-1765.invalid — Contenu indisponible. Résumé des preuves: VirusTotal 2/95 (Bfore.Ai PreCrime…
L’analyse détaillée de PhishDestroy AI reste en anglais afin de préserver le relevé forensique original.
2 / 95 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapport33/100
Ouvrir le rapportno community references
Ouvrir le rapportprovider verdict: clean
Ouvrir le rapportNo threat flag
Ouvrir le rapportPage capture
Ouvrir le rapportResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
On 24 July 2026 the domain www.noderet.pro was observed to be offline but retains a full set of infrastructure artifacts that indicate a wallet/seed phishing operation impersonating the brand “across”. DNS resolution points to the IP address 216.150.16.129, which belongs to Amazon.com, Inc. (AS16509) and is hosted in the United States. The domain is served behind Vercel’s CDN, as evidenced by the authoritative nameservers ns1.vercel-dns.com and ns2.vercel-dns.com and the detection of Vercel‑specific technologies together with HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS). The TLS certificate is issued by Let’s Encrypt (R13) and has a valid chain, confirming that the site employed a legitimate certificate authority.
Registration data show the domain was created through Hostinger Operations UAB, aligning with a common registrar used by malicious actors. Reputation signals are mixed: Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 33 / 100, and the domain appears on one public blocklist that is referenced by the PhishDestroy service, which has already blocked the site. VirusTotal analysis reports that two of ninety‑five AV engines flagged the domain, indicating partial detection. The page title returned by the server is “DappsTools”, a title unrelated to the targeted brand, suggesting a possible attempt to disguise the malicious page behind a generic crypto‑related label.
The combination of wallet/seed phishing classification, brand impersonation of “across”, and the presence of a low trust score places the threat at an elevated risk level. Defenders should continue to block the domain at network perimeter, update URL filtering feeds with the observed IP and hostnames, and monitor for any re‑hosting attempts on alternative Vercel or cloud providers. Further investigation is recommended to capture any cached page content or redirects that may reveal the exact credential‑collection form used by the campaign.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
La réputation Edge-IP n’est pas attribuée à ce domaine.
ns2.vercel-dns.comLocation describes the IP network.
211cb2c69e27dfb8452d7f85cf6baa2e1a1adf170c99378b4618f0146e21879enoderet.proSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of duplicate-disabled-1765.invalid · checked Mar 2, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source2/95 engine detections
View sourceduplicate-disabled-1765.invalid
View source695 domaines ressemblants enregistrés
100 affichés sur 695
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
duplicate-disabled-1765.invalid
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Si vous avez saisi des informations d'identification de compte, des informations personnelles ou de paiement, ou téléchargé un fichier à partir de ce domaine, agissez immédiatement. Vous trouverez ci-dessous des ressources pour vous aider à signaler l'incident et à vous protéger.
Sélectionnez votre pays pour obtenir contacts officiels en matière de cybercriminalité ou créer un projet de plainte →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-1765.invalid)Même si vous ne disposez pas de tous les détails — déposer quand même une plainte. Même des informations partielles peuvent aider les enquêtes.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analyse des menaces à l'aide de listes de blocage stockées, de WHOIS, de DNS et de preuves d'analyse publique
Scanner maintenantSignalez les domaines suspects à notre base de données des menaces — protégez la communauté
SignalerRapports de phishing récents et changements de disponibilité observés
SurveillerSurveillez les menaces en temps réel ou signalez cette alerte si vous pensez qu'il s'agit d'un faux positif
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.