VirusTotal
3 / 95 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapport“Zuzipay”
Usurpation de Across: duplicate-disabled-1556.invalid — Contenu indisponible. Résumé des preuves: VirusTotal 3/95 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker…
L’analyse détaillée de PhishDestroy AI reste en anglais afin de préserver le relevé forensique original.
3 / 95 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapport3/14
no community references
Ouvrir le rapportprovider verdict: clean
Ouvrir le rapportNo threat flag
Ouvrir le rapportPage capture
Ouvrir le rapportResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain is flagged as an elevated-risk brand impersonation site designed to deceive users by mimicking the Across platform. Analysis indicates the infrastructure was specifically crafted to exploit trust in the Across brand, likely for credential theft or fraudulent transaction redirection. The threat type aligns with known patterns of cryptocurrency-related phishing, though no direct crypto drainer functionality was confirmed in this instance. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain www.zuzipay.xyz was registered on June 07, 2025, through NameCheap, Inc. and resolved to IP address 64.29.17.1. Security vendor detections on VirusTotal reached 6/95, while Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of 0/100. The domain appears on one security blocklist and was blocked by PhishDestroy. Technologies detected include Vercel hosting and HSTS implementation, with a Let's Encrypt SSL certificate providing HTTPS encryption. The page title displayed "Zuzipay," further confirming the impersonation attempt. Mitigation steps for this threat type include immediate domain blacklisting in enterprise security gateways and endpoint protection systems. Network administrators should block the IP address 64.29.17.1 and monitor for related domains registered through NameCheap with similar naming patterns. Users should be educated on verifying domain legitimacy before entering credentials, particularly for cryptocurrency platforms. Organizations should implement DMARC, DKIM, and SPF records to prevent similar brand impersonation attempts via email. Given the domain's current offline status, continuous monitoring for reactivation or migration to new infrastructure is recommended.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
La réputation Edge-IP n’est pas attribuée à ce domaine.
dns1.registrar-servers.comdns2.registrar-servers.comLocation describes the IP network.
de6404bf17ff065c017ecf3de8dae4ee03be8bca5fc0ae799cb250ad50eb00c3Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of duplicate-disabled-1556.invalid · checked Jun 27, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
content_divergence · unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-1556.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
duplicate-disabled-1556.invalid
3/95 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourceduplicate-disabled-1556.invalid
View source118 domaines ressemblants enregistrés
100 affichés sur 118
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Si vous avez saisi des informations d'identification de compte, des informations personnelles ou de paiement, ou téléchargé un fichier à partir de ce domaine, agissez immédiatement. Vous trouverez ci-dessous des ressources pour vous aider à signaler l'incident et à vous protéger.
Sélectionnez votre pays pour obtenir contacts officiels en matière de cybercriminalité ou créer un projet de plainte →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-1556.invalid)Même si vous ne disposez pas de tous les détails — déposer quand même une plainte. Même des informations partielles peuvent aider les enquêtes.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analyse des menaces à l'aide de listes de blocage stockées, de WHOIS, de DNS et de preuves d'analyse publique
Scanner maintenantSignalez les domaines suspects à notre base de données des menaces — protégez la communauté
SignalerRapports de phishing récents et changements de disponibilité observés
SurveillerSurveillez les menaces en temps réel ou signalez cette alerte si vous pensez qu'il s'agit d'un faux positif
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.