VirusTotal
1 / 93 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapport“Moon Pay”
Usurpation de Ethereum: dotnetagency.online — Contenu indisponible. Résumé des preuves: VirusTotal 1/93 (Gridinsoft); PhishDestroy score 56/100. Bureau…
L’analyse détaillée de PhishDestroy AI reste en anglais afin de préserver le relevé forensique original.
1 / 93 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapportchecked — no detections recorded
Ouvrir le rapportno community references
Ouvrir le rapportNo threat flag
Ouvrir le rapportNo malicious flag
Ouvrir le rapportResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of dotnetagency.online indicates this domain was actively involved in a cryptocurrency scam targeting Ethereum users, as documented in threat intelligence records. The domain was registered on July 17, 2025, through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, and resolved to the IPv6 address 2a02:4780:1:586:0:2986:43d1:8, hosted on AS47583 (Hostinger International Limited) in the United States. The SSL certificate was issued by R11, a common low-assurance certificate authority often observed in phishing infrastructure. The page title, 'Moon Pay,' suggests an attempt to impersonate a legitimate cryptocurrency payment service, aligning with the reported scam type of a crypto scam.
The domain appears on at least one security blocklist and was flagged by PhishDestroy prior to being taken offline. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of 0/100, further supporting its classification as malicious. VirusTotal data shows a single detection among 93 security vendors, though this limited detection count does not diminish the domain's confirmed involvement in fraudulent activity. No evidence of widespread Safe Browsing or OTX coverage was provided, leaving uncertainty about broader detection at the time of takedown.
Defenders should treat this domain as confirmed malicious infrastructure. While the site is currently offline, the registration and hosting details—particularly the use of Hostinger and a low-assurance SSL certificate—align with patterns observed in other crypto-related phishing campaigns. Organizations should monitor for related domains registered through the same provider or resolving to the same IP range, as these may indicate continued threat actor activity. No further content analysis is available, so the exact mechanics of the scam remain unconfirmed beyond its classification as a crypto scam targeting Ethereum.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Location describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='dotnetagency.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionE
dotnetagency.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
No threat flag
View sourcedotnetagency.online
View source1/93 engine detections
View source52 domaines ressemblants enregistrés
Signalé par 1 membre de la communauté ; première observation le 30/07/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Si vous avez saisi des informations d'identification de compte, des informations personnelles ou de paiement, ou téléchargé un fichier à partir de ce domaine, agissez immédiatement. Vous trouverez ci-dessous des ressources pour vous aider à signaler l'incident et à vous protéger.
Sélectionnez votre pays pour obtenir contacts officiels en matière de cybercriminalité ou créer un projet de plainte →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
dotnetagency.online)Même si vous ne disposez pas de tous les détails — déposer quand même une plainte. Même des informations partielles peuvent aider les enquêtes.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analyse des menaces à l'aide de listes de blocage stockées, de WHOIS, de DNS et de preuves d'analyse publique
Scanner maintenantSignalez les domaines suspects à notre base de données des menaces — protégez la communauté
SignalerRapports de phishing récents et changements de disponibilité observés
SurveillerSurveillez les menaces en temps réel ou signalez cette alerte si vous pensez qu'il s'agit d'un faux positif
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.