VirusTotal
1 / 93 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapport“Boba Network - Claim Airdrop”
Faux airdrop: cloud-dropx.online — Contenu indisponible. Résumé des preuves: VirusTotal 1/93 (Gridinsoft); 4 external blocklist matches; PhishDestroy score…
L’analyse détaillée de PhishDestroy AI reste en anglais afin de préserver le relevé forensique original.
1 / 93 engine detections
Ouvrir le rapportno community references
Ouvrir le rapportNo threat flag
Ouvrir le rapportNo malicious flag
Ouvrir le rapportResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
On 23 July 2026, a technical assessment was performed on the domain cloud-dropx.online. The domain was registered on 23 May 2025 through Hostinger Operations UAB and resolves to the IPv4 address 45.67.136.10, which belongs to autonomous system AS213535 operated by YottaSrc in the Netherlands. The site presented an SSL certificate identified as R13, indicating the presence of a publicly trusted TLS layer. The page title returned by the server at the time of capture was “Boba Network – Claim Airdrop”, and the underlying kit has been classified as an “Airdrop Scam” kit, a known vector for crypto‑related phishing campaigns. The domain is explicitly marked as impersonating the Metamask brand, aligning with the declared crypto‑scam type.
Detection telemetry shows that one of ninety‑three security vendors on VirusTotal flagged the domain as malicious. The host is listed on five independent blocklists, including PhishDestroy, ScamSniffer, Polkadot, Enkrypt and Codeesura, reinforcing the consensus that the infrastructure is being used for illicit activity. Independent reputation services assigned a Gridinsoft trust score of 0 out of 100, the lowest possible rating, indicating a high confidence of malicious intent. The current operational status is “offline”, suggesting that the site has been taken down or is otherwise inaccessible. No live HTTP response or page content was available for further forensic analysis, so the exact phishing landing page structure and any credential‑harvesting mechanisms remain unknown.
However, the combination of a brand‑impersonation tag, a crypto‑airdrop lure, a low trust score, and multiple blocklist entries provides sufficient evidence for defensive actions. Defenders should immediately add cloud-dropx.online to network‑level deny lists, update URL filtering policies, and monitor DNS traffic for queries to the associated IP address and ASN.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Location describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='cloud-dropx.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionEr
cloud-dropx.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Inconnu→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
No threat flag
View sourcecloud-dropx.online
View source1/93 engine detections
View source79 domaines ressemblants enregistrés
Signalé par 1 membre de la communauté ; première observation le 09/09/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Si vous avez saisi des informations d'identification de compte, des informations personnelles ou de paiement, ou téléchargé un fichier à partir de ce domaine, agissez immédiatement. Vous trouverez ci-dessous des ressources pour vous aider à signaler l'incident et à vous protéger.
Sélectionnez votre pays pour obtenir contacts officiels en matière de cybercriminalité ou créer un projet de plainte →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
cloud-dropx.online)Même si vous ne disposez pas de tous les détails — déposer quand même une plainte. Même des informations partielles peuvent aider les enquêtes.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Analyse des menaces à l'aide de listes de blocage stockées, de WHOIS, de DNS et de preuves d'analyse publique
Scanner maintenantSignalez les domaines suspects à notre base de données des menaces — protégez la communauté
SignalerRapports de phishing récents et changements de disponibilité observés
SurveillerSurveillez les menaces en temps réel ou signalez cette alerte si vous pensez qu'il s'agit d'un faux positif
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.