Ir al informe de seguridad
Seguridad de dominio e inteligencia sobre amenazas
fgu.autos favicon

fgu.autos

“ReLai”

Veredicto de amenaza
Assessment sources

Assessment based on the stored source evidence below. Review sources →

Disponibilidad No verificado La accesibilidad actual no está verificada Observado · HTTP probe
VirusTotal detecciones: 5/89
OTX: 4 refs 04/09/2026
API
Registrador
Dynadot
Resolved IP
38.47.238.196
Registered
23/07/2026
Captura guardada

No stored capture is available for this domain.

Este dominio ha sido señalado como malicioso
Motores de seguridad que informan una detección: 5. Tenga extrema precaución: no ingrese credenciales o información personal.
Resumen del informe

fgu.autos — No verificado. Resumen de las pruebas: VirusTotal 5/89 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, SOCRadar, VIPRE); PhishDestroy score 88/100. Registrador: Dynadot.

El análisis detallado de PhishDestroy AI se mantiene en inglés para conservar el registro forense original.

Additional indicators at a glance
VirusTotal
VirusTotal
5 det.
OTX references
ScamAdviser
Scamadviser
80/100Likely Safe
Certificado TLS
Caducado o no verificado
Edad
3 mo New
PhishDestroy
DestroyList
Incluido

Source evidence

5 sources

These are dated observations, not a live safety check. No flag, a stored capture, or a completed analysis does not establish that a site is safe.

VirusTotal

5 / 89

Denunciar
Interpretation & limits

Engine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.

OTX

4 community references

Denunciar
Interpretation & limits

Community publication references, not a vendor verdict or evidence of a common operator.

CF Radar

provider verdict: clean

Observation time not recorded
Denunciar
Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

Scamadviser

80/100

Observation time not recorded
Denunciar
Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

Google Safe Browsing

Checked; no threat flag recorded

Denunciar
Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

Resumen de las pruebas

Crítico
VirusTotal
5/89
OTX
4 community refs

Stored narrative · generated . Provider checks below retain their own observation dates.

Assessment

fgu.autos returned HTTP status 200 in an HTTP check recorded on 2026-10-01, the most recent availability observation in this evidence set. The same domain was first observed on 2026-09-04, roughly four weeks earlier, according to the recorded first-observation date.

Recorded Evidence

The HTTP check on 2026-10-01 recorded status 200 for fgu.autos, while the first observation of the domain is dated 2026-09-04. VirusTotal, checked on 2026-09-18, reported 5 detections across 89 scanners, and OTX, checked on 2026-09-14, listed 4 pulses. The PhishDestroy internal listing was recorded as true, and a PageSpeed check on 2026-09-14 produced a performance score of 96. The registrar is Dynadot Inc, and the SSL certificate issuer is Let's Encrypt / YR1, scanned on 2026-09-14.

Interpretation

The HTTP 200 record describes only the response captured on that date, not the domain's content or its present availability. The VirusTotal and OTX figures reflect separate source observations made on different dates, so they should be read as distinct records rather than combined into a single trend. The PhishDestroy listing and the PageSpeed score likewise come from different checks, and the chronology from first observation to the HTTP check spans several weeks without establishing what occurred in between.

Recommended Actions

Preserve the fgu.autos HTTP check record and the PhishDestroy listing entry as separate source records for later comparison. Compare the VirusTotal and OTX observations against future checks of fgu.autos, keeping each source's own record distinct. Retain the PageSpeed result alongside these records so that later measurements of fgu.autos can be reviewed against the same source set.

Análisis de detección y evasión

Comprobación del enmascaramiento y la distribución del tráfico

Aún no se ha escaneado Aún no se ha registrado ninguna diferencia entre los rastreadores y los navegadores

Observaciones almacenadas de rastreadores frente a navegadores para este servidor, además de una comprobación en tiempo real de la huella digital para sistemas de distribución de tráfico al estilo Keitaro.

Indicador de camuflaje almacenado
Aún no se ha escaneado
Último escaneo de camuflaje

Nota del escáner: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='fgu.autos', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("SOCK

Comprobación de huellas dactilares en directo en TDS
Siete huellas de Keitaro, además de una comparación entre el rastreador y el navegador, que se ejecutan desde el escáner PhishDestroy cuando este panel está abierto.
Esperando

Domain details

Dominio
Reputación de IP abuse score 1/100 1 report PhishingBad Web Bot checked 14/10/2026
OTX Tags 2026-09activeall-domainsblocklistcontentcryptodominiosdrainerfraudlivemonthlyphishdestroyphishingscam
Registrador Dynadot US(US)
Contacto de abuso["abuse@dynadot.com"]
Registro de la ICANNICANN Lookup (RDAP) →
RegistroCreado 23/07/2026 (83d · New) — Expires 23/07/2027
Detalles técnicosProvenance & timestamps
Primera detección04/09/2026
Favicon Hash
ICANN OVERSIGHT

Acreditación y contexto RAA

Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations

For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.

Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.

RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.

Accountability draft No se envía nada automáticamente.

Network & certificates

Stored technical evidence

Network & DNS

Resolved IP
38.47.238.196
Network ASN
AS140227
Organization
Hong Kong Communications International Co., Limited
Observed location
Los Angeles, US
Server header
nginx

Servidores de nombres 1

  • ns2.dyna-ns.net

Location describes the IP network.

Certificado TLS

Issuer
Let's Encrypt / YR1
Valid from
2026-08-26 12:22:05
Valid until
2026-11-24 12:22:04
Hostname coverage
Certificate hostname mismatch
Validity
Within stored validity dates
Collection time
2026-09-14 19:02:04 UTC
Collection source
PhishDestroy collector
Certificate fingerprintbbb552bbd63227b525903a60e5b9da3ecc2340f93992d73e1c12c5bd6858ac6f
Certificate names · 14 SANs
  • bcf.autos
  • bfe.lat
  • esd.autos
  • fcv.autos
  • gdb.autos
  • ghu.autos
  • hdu.lat
  • hfs.lat
  • jfm.lat
  • jfu.lat
  • jgc.lat
  • kfh.autos
  • mhx.lat
  • whu.autos

Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.

viewdns.info · 38.47.238.196rapiddns.io

Latest Classified Outcome 2026-10-14 10:18:46 UTC

Primary outcome Contenido activo reason: Ordinary HTTP content served 90% confidence
Attribution source: Current Http Probe
Evidence layers Availability: Content serving Content: Content served at root DNS: Resolved Registration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation Contenido activo Ordinary HTTP content served 90% 2026-10-14 10:18:46 UTC
RDAP registration Desconocido
Observed timeline last reachable: 2026-10-14 10:18:46 UTC last content: 2026-10-14 10:18:46 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Tecnologías · 4 identified
Detected via Cloudflare Radar · Wappalyzer engine
Denunciar este dominio Envía pruebas y ayuda a proteger a los demás

Análisis de VirusTotal

5 / Los proveedores de seguridad de 89 marcaron este dominio
View on VT
Last analyzed First positive detection Previous stored snapshot: 5 detections
alphaMountain.ai
CRDF
Forcepoint ThreatSeeker
SOCRadar
VIPRE
Análisis del rendimiento del sitio

Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of fgu.autos · checked Sep 14, 2026

96
Good
Performance
FCP
1.8s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
2.33s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
0ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
3.79s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good 50-89 Needs Work 0-49 Poor

Forensic History & Detection Timeline

ThreatLifecycleTelemetry
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
  1. Threat First Observed 2026-09-14 16:53:11 UTC
    Source: PhishDestroy monitoring
    Event details
    Domain ingestion complete. Initial state is marked as alive.

Proceso de respuesta ante amenazas Pipeline

Descubrimiento
Analysis
Monitoring

6 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.

Amenaza detectada
fgu.autos detectados y puestos en cola para su análisis completo
04/09/2026
Cloudflare Radar Report
A stored Cloudflare Radar report is available. The report link alone is not a malicious verdict and does not prove that every network field was captured.
VirusTotal
5/89 recorded on VirusTotal
18/09/2026
OTX Community References
4 community publication references on AlienVault OTX. References are not vendor verdicts and are excluded from the evidence score.
15/10/2026
Technical Analysis Recorded
El informe contiene tecnología almacenada o resultados de análisis forenses.
15/10/2026
Lista de destrucción publicada
04/09/2026
How we investigate & report

Public scans, evidence and abuse channels

We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.

01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups
urlscan.io Screenshot · DOM · HTTP

Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.

VirusTotal Multi-engine verdicts

Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.

Cloudflare Radar DNS · certificates · categories

Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.

AlienVault OTX Threat-intelligence pulses

Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.

Wayback Machine Historical evidence

Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.

crt.sh Certificate Transparency

Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.

DNS Security Filters Quad9 · AdGuard · CleanBrowsing

Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.

Web-Check Surface inspection

Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.

02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels
  1. Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
  2. Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
  3. Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
  4. Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.

Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.

Inteligencia comunitaria

1 reporte de la comunidad

CategoríaPIGBUTCHERING

I was contacted via telegram by someone claiming to work for a company that increased app views. When you viewed an app- you were paid 5-10$ per app. Then you had to complete a “node tasks “ with bitcoin in order to become a full time employee and receive your commissions. Upon c

Datos y informes externos

Community Scam Report — ChainAbuse
1 report filed for fgu.autos (1 written by a person) · category: Pigbutchering · source checked
“I was contacted via telegram by someone claiming to work for a company that increased app views. When you viewed an app- you were paid 5-10$ per app. Then you had to complete a “node tasks “ with bitcoin in order to become a full time employee and receive your commissions. Upon completing task 1 I sent $240 in bitcoin then was told I had to complete task 2 to cash out my original payment and that would cost $700 when I did that they said their financial department was closing and I had to wait u”
— reported by Anonymous on Sep 4, 2026 · Source: ChainAbuse (TRM Labs) — full report and evidence there.
Análisis en profundidad

¿Te ha afectado esta página web?

3 evidence signal groups linked 0 reports recorded No verificado
If credentials were compromised, report immediately. Do not engage with recovery scammers.

Si ingresó credenciales de cuenta, información personal o de pago, o descargó un archivo de este dominio, tome medidas inmediatas. A continuación encontrará recursos que le ayudarán a informar el incidente y protegerse.

Europol
Encuentre el canal de denuncia oficial para su país de la UE
National police directory
¡Cuidado con los estafadores que se hacen pasar por empresas de recuperación de datos! Los delincuentes pueden volver a contactar a las víctimas haciéndose pasar por investigadores, abogados o agentes de recuperación. No pague tarifas por adelantado ni comparta credenciales. Más información sobre el fraude en las ayudas de recuperación →

Informa a las autoridades locales

Seleccione su país para obtener contactos oficiales de cibercrimen o crear un borrador de queja →.

directorio de 97 países

Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent

Borrador asistido por IA: el proveedor de IA procesa los detalles del incidente · Revíselo y envíelo usted mismo

Comprobar cualquier dominio

Análisis de amenazas utilizando listas de bloqueo almacenadas, WHOIS, DNS y evidencia de escaneo público

Escanear ahora

Denunciar un intento de phishing

Envía los dominios sospechosos a nuestra base de datos de amenazas: protege a la comunidad

Denunciar

Flujo de amenazas en tiempo real

Informes de phishing recientes y cambios de disponibilidad observados

Monitorizar

Mantente informado, mantente a salvo

Supervisa las amenazas en tiempo real o impugna esta entrada si crees que se trata de un falso positivo.

Flujo de amenazas en tiempo real Reclamar este anuncio
HTML · IFRAME

Incrustar este informe

Comparte esta información sobre amenazas en tu página web o blog

embed.html
<iframe
  src="https://phishdestroy.io/es/embed/domain/fgu.autos"
  title="PhishDestroy threat report for fgu.autos"
  width="100%" height="320"
  loading="lazy"
  referrerpolicy="no-referrer"
  sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px;max-width:100%"
></iframe>