VirusTotal
5 / 90 engine detections
Abrir informe“Caixa Geral Depósitos CGD”
Dominio en listas de bloqueo: caixageral.digital — Contenido no disponible. Resumen de las pruebas: VirusTotal 5/90 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint…
El análisis detallado de PhishDestroy AI se mantiene en inglés para conservar el registro forense original.
5 / 90 engine detections
Abrir informechecked — no detections recorded
Abrir informeno community references
Abrir informeNo threat flag
Abrir informeNo malicious flag
Abrir informeResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain, caixageral.digital, is flagged as a high-risk generic phishing infrastructure designed to impersonate Caixa Geral Depósitos (CGD), a major Portuguese financial institution. The page title explicitly displays 'Caixa Geral Depósitos CGD,' indicating an intent to deceive customers into submitting sensitive credentials, such as login details or personal identification numbers. Analysis of the domain reveals no direct association with known drainer kits, but the use of a legitimate-looking SSL certificate and financial branding suggests a targeted credential harvesting campaign. Infrastructure analysis reveals the following technical indicators: the domain is registered through Name.com, Inc., and resolves to the IP address 35.157.26.135, hosted on Amazon.com, Inc. (AS16509) in Germany. The domain was created on June 17, 2026, an anomalous future date that may indicate registry manipulation or typosquatting. VirusTotal detection shows 2 out of 95 security vendors flagging the domain as malicious, while it appears on a single security blocklist and is currently blocked by PhishDestroy. No entries were found in Google Safe Browsing at the time of analysis. The domain remains active, posing an ongoing risk to CGD customers and general internet users. The use of a Let's Encrypt SSL certificate (YE1) enhances the appearance of legitimacy, increasing the likelihood of successful deception. Response actions should include immediate blacklisting by network security providers, takedown requests to the hosting provider (Amazon Web Services), and registrar-level suspension. Users are advised to avoid interacting with the domain, verify financial institution URLs through official sources, and enable multi-factor authentication to mitigate credential theft risks. The anomalous creation date and low detection rate suggest the infrastructure may evade automated defenses, requiring manual review for accurate threat classification.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
La reputación de Edge-IP no se atribuye a este dominio.
dns1.p03.nsone.netdns2.p03.nsone.netdns3.p03.nsone.netdns4.p03.nsone.netLocation describes the IP network.
27e9402d0872c5e86ec72e57c7d184c1d4fa3288be1304ad51fd16930153624dSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='caixageral.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionEr
caixageral.digital
5/90 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePD-20260618-B083FB
caixageral.digital
View sourcePage captured
View sourceReportado por 1 miembro de la comunidad; visto por primera vez el 18/06/2026
PD-20260618-B083FB Recipient: abuse@name.com Si ingresó credenciales de cuenta, información personal o de pago, o descargó un archivo de este dominio, tome medidas inmediatas. A continuación encontrará recursos que le ayudarán a informar el incidente y protegerse.
Seleccione su país para obtener contactos oficiales de cibercrimen o crear un borrador de queja →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
caixageral.digital)Aunque no tengas todos los detalles — presenta la denuncia de todos modos. Incluso la información parcial sigue siendo útil para las investigaciones.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Análisis de amenazas utilizando listas de bloqueo almacenadas, WHOIS, DNS y evidencia de escaneo público
Escanear ahoraEnvía los dominios sospechosos a nuestra base de datos de amenazas: protege a la comunidad
DenunciarInformes de phishing recientes y cambios de disponibilidad observados
MonitorizarSupervisa las amenazas en tiempo real o impugna esta entrada si crees que se trata de un falso positivo.
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.