VirusTotal
2 / 93 engine detections
Open reportther.financial is a blocklisted domain detected by PhishDestroy on 2026-02-26. Risk: high (56/100). Status: Content unavailable. Hosting: AS-HOSTINGER Hostinger International Limited, CY. VirusTotal: 2/93 engines flag it. Do not enter credentials or connect a wallet.
“Default page”
2 / 93 engine detections
Open reportno community references
Open reportNo threat flag
Open reportNo malicious flag
Open reportResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of the domain ther.financial indicates it was operating as a generic phishing infrastructure until recently taken offline. The domain was registered on February 21, 2026, and resolved to IP address 82.25.81.58, hosted on AS47583 (Hostinger International Limited) in the United States. The SSL certificate was issued under the R12 authority. At the time of assessment, the domain's page title was recorded as 'Default page,' suggesting either incomplete deployment of phishing content or a placeholder configuration.
Only one security blocklist, PhishDestroy, had flagged this domain, and Gridinsoft assigned it a trust score of 0 out of 100, consistent with known malicious activity. VirusTotal records show two of ninety-three security vendors detected the domain as malicious, though the specific detection context remains unverified. No brand target or phishing kit details are available from the provided data, and the exact nature of the phishing attempt—whether credential harvesting, financial fraud, or another scheme—cannot be determined from current evidence. Defenders should treat this domain as part of a broader phishing campaign, particularly given its recent creation and low detection footprint.
Network-level blocking of 82.25.81.58 and monitoring of newly registered domains under similar naming patterns (e.g., financial-themed subdomains) is recommended. Since the domain is currently offline, defenders should prioritize retrospective log analysis to identify any prior connections from internal assets. If the domain reactivates, immediate re-evaluation of its infrastructure and content is advised.
No. PhishDestroy classifies ther.financial as a blocklisted domain (risk: high, 56/100); it was first detected on 2026-02-26. VirusTotal: 2/93 engines flag it. Treat the site as unsafe.
No. Do not connect a wallet, sign messages or approve tokens on ther.financial. Phishing sites ask for approvals (approve, setApprovalForAll, Permit2) that let the operator move your assets, and a confirmed transaction cannot be reversed.
Change every password you entered there and turn on two-factor authentication. If you connected a wallet or signed something, revoke the approvals and move the remaining funds to a new wallet; never share your seed phrase. Step-by-step help: emergency guide.
Location describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='ther.financial', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError(
ther.financial
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
No threat flag
View sourcether.financial
View source2/93 engine detections
View sourceReported by 1 community member, first seen Sep 17, 2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
If credentials, payment data, or files were exposed, report the incident immediately. Change affected passwords, revoke active sessions, and scan the device.
Select your country to get official cybercrime contacts, or create a complaint draft →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
ther.financial)Even if you don't have all details — file a report anyway. Partial information still helps investigations.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Threat analysis using stored blocklist, WHOIS, DNS, and public scan evidence
Scan NowSubmit suspicious domains to our threat database — protect the community
ReportRecent phishing reports and observed availability changes
MonitorMonitor live threats or contest this listing if you believe it's a false positive
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.