Skip to security report
Domain security report
secure.trezorgroup.com favicon

secure.trezorgroup.com

“Trezorgroup”

Threat verdict
Assessment sources

Assessment based on the stored source evidence below. Review sources →

Availability Last known active Latest stored reachability observation Observed · HTTP probe
VirusTotal detections: 11/89 Spamhaus DBL: DBL_PHISH URLQuery threat systems: 1 alert Automated brand label: Trezor
Aug 4, 2026 Trezor 1 Report Sent
API
Registrar
NiceNIC
Resolved IP
91.92.241.159
Registered
May 20, 2026
4 sources
In this reportGet help
This domain has been flagged as malicious
Security engines reporting a detection: 11. Exercise extreme caution — do not enter credentials or personal information.
ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence

The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at . The recorded recipient is abuse@omegatech.sc. The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 2 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.

ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.

Elapsed since first report
2 months
Reports sent
1
Latest case ID
PD-20260804-80A825
Current status
HTTP 307 at latest stored check

Additional indicators at a glance

Spamhaus DBL
DBL_PHISH
VirusTotal
VirusTotal
11 det.
URLQuery
URLQuery
1 threat alert
URLScan
URLScan
TLS Certificate
Within stored validity dates
Let's Encrypt · Hostname coverage not recorded
Age
5 mo
Observed status
Last known active 307
PhishDestroy
DestroyList
Listed
Reports Sent
1

Source evidence

9 · sources

These are dated observations, not a live safety check. No flag, a stored capture, or a completed analysis does not establish that a site is safe.

VirusTotal

11 / 89

Report
Interpretation & limits

Engine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.

URLQuery

1 threat-system alert

Report
Interpretation & limits

Alerts refer to the preserved scan. They do not describe the current state of the site.

Spamhaus DBL

DBL_PHISH

Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

OTX

no community references

Report
Interpretation & limits

Community publication references, not a vendor verdict or evidence of a common operator.

CF Radar

provider verdict: clean

Observation time not recorded
Report
Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

URLScan capture

stored report

View stored capture ↗
Report
Interpretation & limits

A preserved page image documents what the collector received; a capture is not a safety verdict.

URLScan verdict

Analysis completed

Report
Interpretation & limits

This is the recorded automated analysis. Completion alone is not a safety verdict.

Google Safe Browsing

Checked; no threat flag recorded

Report
Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

Public blocklists

0 external matches

Details
Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

Network Security Intelligence Registrar context
Threat Detection Systems 1 alert
Detection System Indicator Verdict Alert
DNS4EU secure.trezorgroup.com malicious Sinkholed
Registrar context NiceNIC
Stored registration data identifies NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED (IANA 3765) as the registrar. PhishDestroy maintains separate NiceNIC abuse-report research; registrar association is contextual and is not an independent detection for this domain.
NiceNIC Verdict Full Investigation

Evidence Summary

Critical
VirusTotal
11/89
URLScan
Stored capture

AI-assisted analysis Stored narrative · generated . Provider checks below retain their own observation dates. This narrative is an interpretation of collected evidence, not an independent source verdict.

Analysis indicates that the subdomain secure.trezorgroup.com is currently classified as a crypto‑drainer threat. The domain has been added to the PhishDestroy blocklist and is listed on one additional public security blocklist, indicating that at least two independent sources have taken mitigation action. A VirusTotal scan shows that 13 of 91 antivirus and URL‑reputation engines returned a positive detection for malicious activity, confirming that a notable minority of scanners recognize the site as hostile.

The specific detection signatures and the exact malicious payload have not been publicly disclosed, and no further technical details such as hosting IP, ASN, SSL certificate properties, or HTTP response codes are available in the shared intelligence. Consequently, the broader infrastructure supporting the domain remains uncertain, and it is not possible to attribute the operation to a particular actor or to determine the scale of the campaign beyond the observed detections. Defenders should immediately block any network traffic to secure.trezorgroup.com at perimeter firewalls, DNS resolvers, and endpoint protection tools.

Security teams should also add the domain to internal allow‑list exclusions for legitimate services only after a thorough verification, and monitor for any outbound connections that may indicate attempted cryptocurrency wallet theft. Organizations employing web‑filtering solutions should ensure the domain is flagged as high‑risk, and incident response teams should be prepared to investigate any alerts that reference the domain, especially those tied to cryptocurrency transaction anomalies. Continuous re‑evaluation is advised, as additional indicators may emerge from future scans or threat‑intel feeds.

Data coverage & collection

23 · datasets with records / 8 · not recorded

What this report contains, where it came from, and when it was collected. A retained record can be incomplete; collection status is separate from the threat assessment.

Recorded dataPartial recordUTC
VirusTotal
11 / 89 · engine detections
URLScan analysis
Automated verdict retained
URLQuery
2 · recorded detections / alerts
Google Safe Browsing
Checked; no threat flag recorded
OTX publications
0 · community references
External blocklists
0 · external matches
Cloudflare Radar
cleanCollection time not recorded
Spamhaus DBL
DBL_PHISH
Domain registration
NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITEDCollection time not recorded
Network & DNS
91.92.241.159 · 2 · nameserversCollection time not recorded
TLS certificate
Let's Encrypt
Page captures
4 · retained captures
Page analysis
2 · automated brand labels
Observed indicators
0 · wallet / Telegram indicators
Detection & evasion
Stored browser and crawler comparison
PageSpeed performance
82/100 · mobile performance
Response records
1 · outgoing report records
Availability history
35 · stored state changes
Source observation history
1 · stored source events
Lookalike relationships
74 · retained relationshipsCollection time not recorded
Chainabuse records
1 · recorded reports
IP reputation
Network-level observations
Wayback archive
Archive link retained
Not recorded in this report 8

These checks have no retained result. This does not mean they passed or that a scan is running.

  • PhishStats
  • DNS security filters
  • Gridinsoft
  • Scamadviser
  • HTML archives
  • Site configuration files
  • Recorded subdomains
  • Community reports
Download the dated observations and supporting metadata.

Blocklist records

0 · external source matches

Public Blocklist Status

Domain, network & archive

NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · 91.92.241.159 · DNS, TLS and retained responses

Domain details

Domain
URLScan verdict Analysis completed score 0 report ↗
IP Reputation abuse score 0/100 1 report PhishingExploited Host checked Oct 3, 2026
Registrar (base domain) NiceNIC RU(RU) PhishDestroy Investigation
Registration (base domain)trezorgroup.com · Created May 20, 2026 (149d) — Expires May 20, 2027
HTTP Status307 Temporary Redirect
Technical detailsProvenance & timestamps
First DetectedAug 4, 2026
DOM Analysisanalyzed Aug 4, 2026score 88/1002 brand signals
Submitted URLhttps://secure.trezorgroup.com/en/login?… query redacted
Favicon Hash
Case ID

Network & certificates

Stored technical evidence

Network & DNS

Resolved IP
91.92.241.159
Network ASN
AS202412
Organization
Omegatech LTD
Observed location
Amsterdam, NL
Server header
nginx
Nameservers 2
  • ns1.mykocrm.co
  • ns2.mykocrm.co

Location describes the IP network.

TLS certificate

Issuer
Let's Encrypt
Valid from
2026-09-10 12:09:30
Valid until
2026-12-09 12:09:29
Hostname coverage
Hostname coverage not recorded
Validity
Within stored validity dates
Collection time
2026-10-10 16:03:00 UTC
Collection source
PhishDestroy collector
Certificate fingerprintf60db5fa555fcfff698843b6b7d04e025bf4670ace09bee6ec3de3da92cbfb28

Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.

Latest Classified Outcome 2026-10-17 11:00:04 UTC

Primary outcome Redirecting reason: HTTP redirect observed 80% confidence
Attribution source: Current Http Probe
Evidence layers Availability: Redirecting Content: Unknown DNS: Resolved Registration: Active
Latest HTTP observation Redirecting HTTP redirect observed 80% 2026-10-17 11:00:04 UTC
RDAP registration Active NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED · IANA 3765 RDAP HTTP 200 source: Rdap Status Collector clientDeleteProhibitedclientTransferProhibited expires 2027-05-20 19:59:05 UTC checked 2026-08-05 19:23:43 UTC
Observed timeline last reachable: 2026-10-17 11:00:04 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Technologies · 6 identified
Detected via Cloudflare Radar · Wappalyzer engine
Report This Domain Submit evidence & help protect others

VirusTotal Analysis

11 / 89 security vendors flagged this domain
View on VT
Last analyzed Previous stored snapshot: 15 detections
alphaMountain.ai
BitDefender
ESET
Forcepoint ThreatSeeker
Fortinet
G-Data
Kaspersky
Lionic
SOCRadar
Sophos
VIPRE

Archived Evidence

Wayback Machine Snapshot
A historical snapshot is available for evidence review
View Archive
Site Performance Analysis

Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of secure.trezorgroup.com · checked Aug 4, 2026

82
Needs Work
Performance
FCP
2.45s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
2.92s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
68ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
14.6s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good 50-89 Needs Work 0-49 Poor
Registration & observation details9

Registration evidence

RDAP statuses
clientdeleteprohibited · clienttransferprohibited
RDAP response
200
Registrar in registration evidence
NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED
Registrar IANA ID
3765
Expiration recorded by RDAP
Registration observation
Registration source
rdap_status_collector

Availability observations

Last reachable observation
Estimate basis
Currently reachable

An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.

Detection & evasion checks

Stored browser and crawler observations

Detection-evasion analysis

Cloaking and traffic-distribution check

Not yet scanned No crawler-versus-browser difference has been recorded yet

Stored crawler-versus-browser observations for this host, plus a live fingerprint check for Keitaro-style traffic distribution systems.

Stored cloaking flag
Not yet scanned
Last cloaking scan
Server header seen by scanner
nginx

Scanner note: redirect: raw=redirect_307; http=307; via=https_proxy; location=/en; server=nginx

Live TDS fingerprint check
Seven Keitaro fingerprints and a browser-versus-crawler comparison. A new scan starts only when you press the button.
On demand

No live-check result has been retained.

Timeline & response

1 · outbound report records

Forensic History & Detection Timeline

ThreatLifecycleTelemetry
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
  1. Threat First Observed 2026-08-04 02:22:14 UTC
    Source: PhishDestroy monitoring
    Event details
    Domain ingestion complete. Initial state is marked as unknown.
Stored observation history36

Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.

  1. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  2. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  3. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  4. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  5. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

Earlier observations 31
  1. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  2. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  3. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  4. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  5. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  6. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  7. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  8. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  9. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  10. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  11. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  12. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  13. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  14. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  15. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  16. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  17. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  18. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  19. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  20. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  21. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  22. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  23. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  24. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  25. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  26. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  27. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  28. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→redirected

    http_redirect

  29. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  30. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    redirected

    http_redirect

  31. Availability monitor · First collection record

    Unknown

Threat Response Pipeline

Discovery
Analysis
Notifications
Monitoring

12 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.

Threat Ingested
secure.trezorgroup.com detected and queued for full analysis
Aug 4, 2026
Spamhaus DBL
Spamhaus DBL recorded DBL_PHISH
Oct 3, 2026
URLScan.io Capture
Stored URLScan report with capture artifacts
Aug 4, 2026
Cloudflare Radar Report
A stored Cloudflare Radar report is available. The report link alone is not a malicious verdict and does not prove that every network field was captured.
Web Archive
Preserved in Wayback Machine — historical evidence archived
Aug 4, 2026
VirusTotal
11/89 recorded on VirusTotal
Sep 12, 2026
Registrar Context: NiceNIC
Separate registrar research is available. Registrar association is contextual and is not scored as an independent detection.
Brand Impersonation
Impersonation of Trezor
Forensic Evidence Collected
Stored evidence from URLScan.io, URLQuery, stored screenshot
Aug 4, 2026
Technical Analysis Recorded
The report contains stored technology or forensic-analysis results.
Oct 17, 2026
Sent Report Recorded
Stored outgoing record associated with registrar NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED, 2 abuse contacts
abuse@omegatech.scabuse@nicenic.net
Aug 4, 2026
DestroyList Published
Aug 4, 2026
Monitoring Continues
The domain remains reachable or access-restricted; future checks may update this observation.
How we investigate & report

Public scans, evidence and abuse channels

We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.

01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups
urlscan.io Screenshot · DOM · HTTP

Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.

VirusTotal Multi-engine verdicts

Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.

Cloudflare Radar DNS · certificates · categories

Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.

AlienVault OTX Threat-intelligence pulses

Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.

Wayback Machine Historical evidence

Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.

crt.sh Certificate Transparency

Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.

DNS Security Filters Quad9 · AdGuard · CleanBrowsing

Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.

Web-Check Surface inspection

Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.

02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels
  1. Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
  2. Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
  3. Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
  4. Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.

Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.

Related infrastructure

Shared hosting, registrar records and related domains

Lookalike domains

74 stored lookalike domains

Show all (62)
grezor.io replacement rezor.io omission rrezor.io replacement rtezor.io transposition tdezor.io replacement teezor.io replacement terzor.io transposition tezor.io omission tfezor.io replacement tr.ezor.io subdomain tr3zor.io replacement treeor.io replacement treezor.io insertion treor.io omission treqor.io replacement tresor.io replacement trezeor.io insertion trezer.io vowel-swap trezior.io insertion trezir.io replacement trezkor.io insertion trezlor.io insertion trezo.io omission trezoe.io replacement trezoir.io insertion trezopr.io insertion trezor-io.com various trezorio.com various trezot.io replacement trezpor.io insertion trezpr.io replacement trezr.io omission trezro.io transposition trezxor.io insertion trezzor.io insertion trizor.io vowel-swap trozor.io vowel-swap trrzor.io replacement trtezor.io insertion trwezor.io insertion trwzor.io replacement trzeor.io transposition trzzor.io replacement ttezor.io replacement ttrezor.io insertion tyrezor.io insertion yrezor.io replacement ytrezor.io insertion prezor.io bitsquatting treazor.io insertion trerzor.io insertion trewzor.io insertion trexor.io bitsquatting trez0r.io homoglyph trezaor.io insertion trezora.io addition trezore.io addition trezoro.io addition trezorr.io addition trezors.io addition xn--tezor-5bb.io homoglyph xn--trezo-9bb.io homoglyph

Community records

Retained community reports and observations

Community intelligence

1 community report

CategoryIMPERSONATION

Brand abuse: phishing, credential harvesting, impersonation, impersonating Trezor

Evidence & investigation tools

Original reports, independent checks and evidence links

Evidence & External Reports

Third-Party Detection — ChainAbuse
1 report filed for secure.trezorgroup.com · category: Impersonation · source checked
Flagged by automated brand-abuse detection on May 30, 2026 — automated submission, not a user testimony. Source: ChainAbuse (TRM Labs).
Submitted Evidence Snapshot
Sent: Ledger records: 1 Case ID: PD-20260804-80A825 Recipient: abuse@omegatech.sc
Page title stored with report: Trezorgroup
PDF notice generated Notice text archived (416 chars)
Abuse notice text as sent to the provider
Registrar: NICENIC International Group Co., Limited (Hong Kong (China))
Policy Violations: “Services may be used only for lawful purposes… fraud, abuse and illegal activity prohibited. Violations may result in immediate suspension.” + dedicated abuse handling and takedown
Applicable Laws: Crimes Ordinance Cap.200 (Fraud), Theft Ordinance Cap.210 §16A (fraud by deception), Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance Cap.486
Deep Analysis

Help & reporting

Recovery steps, reporting contacts and complaint drafts

Help & reporting

Were You Affected by This Site?

5 evidence signal groups linked 1 stored notification records Last known active
If credentials were compromised, report immediately. Do not engage with recovery scammers.

If credentials, payment data, or files were exposed, report the incident immediately. Change affected passwords, revoke active sessions, and scan the device.

Official reporting routes
Beware of recovery scammers! Recovery scammers may pose as investigators, lawyers, or tracing services. Do not pay upfront fees or disclose credentials. Learn more about recovery fraud →
Report to Your Local Authorities

Select your country to get official cybercrime contacts, or create a complaint draft →.

97-country directory

Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent

Template-based draft • optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent · Review and submit it yourself
After a phishing incident

Recommendations & Advice for Victims

Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.

What should I do immediately?

Urgent

Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.

  • Change all passwords — email, exchange accounts, anything that shares the same password
  • Enable 2FA using an authenticator app (not SMS). Disable SMS-based recovery
  • Freeze cards if you entered banking details on the phishing site

What information should I collect for my report?

FBI guidelines

Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗

  • Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
  • Exact dates & times — of each transaction and first contact with scammer
  • Screenshots — scam website, chat messages, emails, wallet transactions, social media
  • All URLs & domains used by the scammer (including secure.trezorgroup.com)
  • Communications — emails, texts, phone numbers, usernames the scammer used

Even if you don't have all details — file a report anyway. Partial information still helps investigations.

Where should I report the scam?

  • FBI IC3 — Internet Crime Complaint Center (US federal reporting)
  • Europol — European cybercrime reporting (EU)
  • Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
  • Local police — creates an official record, even if they can't act immediately

A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.

How do phishing scams typically work?

  • Fake websites — pixel-perfect clones of legitimate sites with slightly altered domains
  • Pig butchering — trust built over weeks via Telegram/WhatsApp/dating apps, then money stolen
  • Recovery scams — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
  • AI-powered scams — deepfakes, automated phishing, and AI-generated sites making fraud harder to detect

How can I protect myself in the future?

  • Bookmark official sites — never click links from emails, DMs, or ads
  • Verify domains — check on PhishDestroy before interacting. Check HTTPS, spelling, domain age
  • "Too good to be true" = scam — guaranteed returns, celebrity endorsements, urgent deadlines

Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams

Stay Informed, Stay Safe

Monitor live threats or contest this listing if you believe it's a false positive

Live Threat Feed Appeal This Listing
Read the evidence in context

About This Report: secure.trezorgroup.com

Stored evidence snapshot. Source timestamps appear where available.

Captured title: “Trezorgroup”. Apparent target: Trezor.

VirusTotal detections for secure.trezorgroup.com: 11 (2026-09-12 02:29:30 UTC).

Each source records a particular observation. A screenshot, an available website, or a result with no detections does not establish that a site is safe. Source results can change after they are collected.

Embed this report

A compact widget with a link to the evidence

HTML · IFRAME

Embed This Report

Share this threat intelligence on your website or blog

embed.html
<iframe
  src="https://phishdestroy.io/embed/domain/secure.trezorgroup.com"
  title="PhishDestroy threat report for secure.trezorgroup.com"
  width="100%" height="320"
  loading="lazy"
  referrerpolicy="no-referrer"
  sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px;max-width:100%"
></iframe>