VirusTotal
3 / 95 engine detections
Open reportrevertlf.finance is an Aerodrome impersonation page detected by PhishDestroy on 2026-02-26. Risk: high (65/100). Status: Content unavailable. Hosting: SELECTEL JSC Selectel, RU. VirusTotal: 3/95 engines flag it. Do not enter credentials or connect a wallet.
“revert”
3 / 95 engine detections
Open reportno community references
Open reportNo threat flag
Open reportNo malicious flag
Open reportResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
revertlf.finance was observed on 24 July 2026 as an offline domain that actively impersonated the aerodrome brand in a crypto‑scam campaign. The domain was registered on 21 February 2026 and resolves to the IPv4 address 94.26.255.20, which is hosted by JSC Selectel under ASN 49505 in the Russian Federation. The TLS certificate presented by the site is identified as “R10”, indicating a standard certificate without extended validation. A passive scan of the page returned the title “revert”, but no further content has been captured because the site was taken offline before detailed page analysis could be performed.
Threat intelligence aggregators flagged the domain on three of ninety‑five VirusTotal scanners, and the domain appears on two independent security blocklists. The Gridinsoft trust score is 0 out of 100, and the domain is listed by PhishDestroy and ScamSniffer as a confirmed malicious resource. These indicators collectively corroborate the classification of the site as a brand‑impersonation crypto scam. The evidence does not reveal the specific phishing kit, the exact URL paths used, or any malicious payload delivered to victims, leaving the full operational details uncertain.
Defenders should block the domain at network perimeter devices, update DNS‑sinkhole lists, and ensure that any endpoint protection solutions incorporate the reported indicators of compromise, including the IP address 94.26.255.20, the “R10” certificate fingerprint, and the low trust score. Continuous monitoring of the host ASN and related sub‑domains is recommended, as the infrastructure provider (Selectel) may be reused for future campaigns. Organizations that reference the aerodrome brand should also educate users about the possibility of fraudulent communications that reference the brand, despite the current offline status of revertlf.finance.
Stored page, network and scanner observations, grouped by source and observation time.
Observed: · Retrieved:
| Uuid | 0197eaa6-01d3-749b-86c1-cf62cb2c5645 |
|---|---|
| Final url | https://revertlf.finance/ |
| Status | 200 |
| Redirected | https-only |
| Redirects | [
{
"to": "https://revertlf.finance/",
"from": "http://revertlf.finance/",
"status": 307
}
] |
| Ip | 94.26.255.20 |
| Ptr | isp4.ru.fastfox.pro |
| Contacted domains | [
"api.web3modal.org",
"1rpc.io",
"binance.nodereal.io",
"bsc-dataseed2.bnbchain.org",
"fonts.gstatic.com",
"fonts.googleapis.com",
"bsc-dataseed3.bnbchain.org",
"bsc-dataseed4.bnbchain.org",
"bsc-dataseed.bnbchain.org",
"api.ipify.org",
"bsc-dataseed1.bnbchain.org",
"rpc.ankr.com",
"cdnjs.cloudflare.com",
"pulse.walletconnect.org",
"secure.walletconnect.org",
"cdn.jsdelivr.net"
] |
| Contacted IP addresses | [
"142.250.185.163",
"2a00:1450:4001:808::200a",
"104.18.19.237",
"172.67.21.108",
"20.105.41.175",
"52.208.210.254",
"2a04:4e42::485",
"104.26.13.205",
"99.80.132.223",
"2605:6440:3001:ba::",
"104.17.24.14",
"94.26.255.20"
] |
| Asns | [
"15169",
"13335",
"8075",
"16509",
"54113",
"396356",
"49505"
] |
| Countries | [
"US",
"DE",
"IE",
"RU"
] |
| Document hash | 2953ff3988d93f87eea1b4ad25bd36473332dfb409a5bf658c37543d001f0a21 |
| Script hashes | [
"29158d2dd196dd6138a5000fabaf85e2f89d12613b4ccab59168d5bd1f202da1",
"5e73f708c447d1843ced8f884dc7f58a496f23a237955266bbf87b8977a04cce"
] |
| Globals | [
"createSetAuthorityInstruction",
"AuthorityType",
"serialize",
"BN",
"sha256",
"Buffer",
"sendAndConfirmTransaction",
"Connection",
"Transaction",
"SystemProgram",
"PublicKey",
"LAMPORTS_PER_SOL",
"SYSVAR_CLOCK_PUBKEY",
"Keypair",
"getAssociatedTokenAddress",
"AccountLayout",
"TOKEN_PROGRAM_ID",
"ASSOCIATED_TOKEN_PROGRAM_ID",
"createAssociatedTokenAccountInstruction",
"createTransferInstruction",
"TransactionInstruction",
"axios",
"finger",
"fdiuhreo8",
"CryptoJS",
"_ethers",
"ethers",
"__r",
"MerkleTree",
"MerkleMountainRange",
"IncrementalMerkleTree",
"MerkleSumTree",
"global",
"process",
"litPropertyMetadata",
"reactiveElementVersions",
"litHtmlVersions",
"litElementVersions",
"walletConnectVars",
"CoinbaseWalletSDK"
] |
| Cookies | [
"gacfxdn1x7"
] |
| Tls | {
"san": [
"revertlf.finance",
"www.revertlf.finance"
],
"cipher": "AES_256_GCM",
"issuer": "R10",
"subject": "revertlf.finance",
"protocol": "TLS 1.3",
"valid_to": "2025-10-01T21:29:47Z",
"valid_from": "2025-07-03T21:29:48Z"
} |
| Tls age days | 4 |
| Tls valid days | 89 |
| Requests | 126 |
| Provider verdicts | {
"engines": {
"tags": [
"urlscan-ml",
"urlscan-ml-0.1.0-1-d9114fd"
],
"score": 73,
"malicious": true
},
"overall": {
"score": 0,
"malicious": false
}
} |
| HTTP headers | {
"server": "nginx/1.26.3",
"content-type": "text/html; charset=UTF-8",
"x-powered-by": "PHP/8.2.27"
} |
No. PhishDestroy classifies revertlf.finance as an Aerodrome impersonation page (risk: high, 65/100); it was first detected on 2026-02-26. VirusTotal: 3/95 engines flag it. Treat the site as unsafe.
No. Do not connect a wallet, sign messages or approve tokens on revertlf.finance. Phishing sites ask for approvals (approve, setApprovalForAll, Permit2) that let the operator move your assets, and a confirmed transaction cannot be reversed.
Change every password you entered there and turn on two-factor authentication. If you connected a wallet or signed something, revoke the approvals and move the remaining funds to a new wallet; never share your seed phrase. Step-by-step help: emergency guide.
Last checked
Location describes the IP network.
revertlf.financewww.revertlf.financeSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='revertlf.finance', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionErro
revertlf.finance
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
No threat flag
View sourcerevertlf.finance
View source3/95 engine detections
View sourceReported by 1 community member, first seen Jul 13, 2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
If credentials, payment data, or files were exposed, report the incident immediately. Change affected passwords, revoke active sessions, and scan the device.
Select your country to get official cybercrime contacts, or create a complaint draft →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
revertlf.finance)Even if you don't have all details — file a report anyway. Partial information still helps investigations.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Threat analysis using stored blocklist, WHOIS, DNS, and public scan evidence
Scan NowSubmit suspicious domains to our threat database — protect the community
ReportRecent phishing reports and observed availability changes
MonitorMonitor live threats or contest this listing if you believe it's a false positive
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.