VirusTotal
4 / 89 engine detections
Open report“MYF Capitals Investment – Fast”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@hetzner.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 2 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
4 / 89 engine detections
Open reportScan report
Open report5 community references
Open reportprovider verdict: clean
Open reportNo threat flag
Open reportNo malicious flag
Open reportResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
Analysis of the domain myfcapitals.online indicates active credential-phishing infrastructure as of July 27, 2026. The domain was registered on March 30, 2026, through Atak Domain Bilgi Teknolojileri A.Ş., a registrar previously associated with phishing campaigns. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain resolves to the IP address 88.198.100.143 and employs nameservers ns1.safedns247.com, ns2.safedns247.com, ns1.twoonehosting.com, and ns2.twoonehosting.co, which have been observed in other low-reputation hosting environments. At the time of this report, the domain appears on a single security blocklist maintained by PhishDestroy, suggesting limited detection coverage.
No detections were recorded among the 91 vendors that scanned the domain on VirusTotal; however, the absence of flags does not confirm safety, as phishing domains often evade initial detection. The domain remains active, with no confirmed brand impersonation or specific scam type identified from available metadata. Defenders should treat this domain as suspicious due to its recent registration, use of nameservers linked to prior abuse, and inclusion on a specialized phishing blocklist.
Further monitoring is recommended to assess whether additional security vendors will flag the domain as malicious. Organizations may consider preemptive blocking of the domain and its resolving IP address to mitigate potential credential-harvesting risks. The domain’s content has not been analyzed for specific phishing kits or targeted brands, and no HTTP status or SSL anomalies were provided in the available intelligence.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.safedns247.comns1.twoonehosting.comns2.safedns247.comns2.twoonehosting.commyfcapitals.onlinepriority 0Location describes the IP network.
253f557568946d507822fcd44dddcdffdb2dd1206f4c5d9c8bfb9c7562ab8ac6Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
myfcapitals.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
protected→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
Reachable
5 community references
View source4/89 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260727-09BD11
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcemyfcapitals.online
View source95 stored lookalike domains
1 community report
CategoryOTHER_INVESTMENT_SCAM
Data submited by Intelligence for good
PD-20260727-09BD11 Recipient: abuse@hetzner.com If credentials, payment data, or files were exposed, report the incident immediately. Change affected passwords, revoke active sessions, and scan the device.
Select your country to get official cybercrime contacts, or create a complaint draft →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
myfcapitals.online)Even if you don't have all details — file a report anyway. Partial information still helps investigations.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Threat analysis using stored blocklist, WHOIS, DNS, and public scan evidence
Scan NowSubmit suspicious domains to our threat database — protect the community
ReportRecent phishing reports and observed availability changes
MonitorMonitor live threats or contest this listing if you believe it's a false positive
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.