Skip to security report
Analytics Dashboard
Domain security report
aelford.shop favicon

aelford.shop

“Global Streetwear Brand | Aelfric Eden”

Threat verdict
CriticalDomain Appeal
Assessment sources

Assessment based on the stored source evidence below. Review sources →

Availability Content unavailable Content was unavailable in the latest observation Observed · HTTP probe
Risk signals
VirusTotal detections: 2/89 Spamhaus DBL: DBL_SPAM URLQuery threat systems: 1 alert Automated brand label: Fakeshop
OTX: 4 refs Sep 9, 2026 Fakeshop 1 Report Sent
API
Registrar
Dynadot
Resolved IP
195.96.131.106
Registered
May 14, 2026
3 sources
The capture source is temporarily unavailable.
1 / 3
Source
Primary capture
Collected · UTC
Open capture
In this reportGet help
This domain has been flagged as malicious
Security engines reporting a detection: 2. Exercise extreme caution — do not enter credentials or personal information.

Additional indicators at a glance

Spamhaus DBL
DBL_SPAM
VirusTotal
VirusTotal
2 det.
URLQuery
URLQuery
1 threat alert
OTX references
4 community refs
URLScan
URLScan
Report ↗
TLS Certificate
Expired or unverified dates -6d
Let's Encrypt / YE2 · Hostname coverage not recorded
Age
5 mo
Observed status
Content unavailable
PhishDestroy
DestroyList
Listed
Reports Sent
1

Source evidence

9 · sources

These are dated observations, not a live safety check. No flag, a stored capture, or a completed analysis does not establish that a site is safe.

VirusTotal

2 / 89

Report
Interpretation & limits

Engine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.

URLQuery

1 threat-system alert

Report
Interpretation & limits

Alerts refer to the preserved scan. They do not describe the current state of the site.

URLScan verdict

malicious

Report
Interpretation & limits

This is the recorded automated analysis. Completion alone is not a safety verdict.

Spamhaus DBL

DBL_SPAM

Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

OTX

4 community references

Report
Interpretation & limits

Community publication references, not a vendor verdict or evidence of a common operator.

CF Radar

provider verdict: clean

Observation time not recorded
Report
Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

URLScan capture

stored report

View stored capture ↗
Report
Interpretation & limits

A preserved page image documents what the collector received; a capture is not a safety verdict.

Google Safe Browsing

Checked; no threat flag recorded

Report
Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

Public blocklists

0 external matches

Details
Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

Network Security Intelligence
Threat Detection Systems 1 alert
Detection System Indicator Verdict Alert
DNS4EU aelford.shop malicious Sinkholed
Stored URLQuery scan evidence · Sep 9, 2026 14:11 UTC Open source report

Evidence Summary

Critical
VirusTotal
2/89
OTX
4 community refs
URLScan
Stored capture

AI-assisted analysis Stored narrative · generated . Provider checks below retain their own observation dates. This narrative is an interpretation of collected evidence, not an independent source verdict.

Assessment

aelford.shop was observed returning an HTTP 502 status on 2026-10-01, indicating a server error at that time. The domain is also listed in the publisher-owned PhishDestroy internal catalogue.

Recorded Evidence

VirusTotal checked aelford.shop on 2026-09-10, reporting 2 detections out of 89 scanners. OTX pulses were recorded four times as of 2026-09-10. The SSL certificate, issued by Let's Encrypt / YE2, was scanned on 2026-09-09. The domain was registered with Dynadot Inc. on 2026-05-14, and its PageSpeed performance score was 81 on 2026-09-09.

Interpretation

The evidence from VirusTotal, OTX, and PageSpeed provides a multi-source perspective, each with its own observation date. Comparing these dates helps identify changes in the domain's technical and security profile over time, but does not confirm any current status or activity. The presence in the PhishDestroy internal listing and the server error observed on 2026-10-01 suggest ongoing monitoring is warranted.

Recommended Actions

Retain all evidence related to aelford.shop for future reference and comparison. When reviewing subsequent observations, carefully note the dates and any changes in server response or security findings. Avoid submitting sensitive information to aelford.shop during any review process, and continue monitoring updates from sources such as VirusTotal and OTX.

Data coverage & collection

19 · datasets with records / 12 · not recorded

What this report contains, where it came from, and when it was collected. A retained record can be incomplete; collection status is separate from the threat assessment.

Recorded dataPartial recordUTC
VirusTotal
2 / 89 · engine detections
URLScan analysis
Automated verdict retained
URLQuery
2 · recorded detections / alerts
Google Safe Browsing
Checked; no threat flag recorded
OTX publications
4 · community references
External blocklists
0 · external matches
Cloudflare Radar
cleanCollection time not recorded
Spamhaus DBL
DBL_SPAM
Domain registration
Dynadot Inc.Collection time not recorded
Network & DNS
195.96.131.106 · 1 · nameserversCollection time not recorded
TLS certificate
Let's Encrypt / YE2
Page captures
3 · retained captures
Observed indicators
0 · wallet / Telegram indicators
Detection & evasion
Stored browser and crawler comparison
PageSpeed performance
81/100 · mobile performance
Response records
1 · outgoing report records
Availability history
16 · stored state changes
Source observation history
6 · stored source events
IP reputation
Network-level observations
Not recorded in this report 12

These checks have no retained result. This does not mean they passed or that a scan is running.

  • PhishStats
  • DNS security filters
  • Gridinsoft
  • Scamadviser
  • HTML archives
  • Page analysis
  • Site configuration files
  • Recorded subdomains
  • Lookalike relationships
  • Community reports
  • Chainabuse records
  • Wayback archive
Download the dated observations and supporting metadata.

Blocklist records

0 · external source matches

Public Blocklist Status

Domain, network & archive

Dynadot Inc. · 195.96.131.106 · DNS, TLS and retained responses

Domain details

Domain
URLScan verdict Malicious score 100 Phishing brand: Fakeshop report ↗
IP Reputation abuse score 0/100 2 reports Port Scan checked Sep 9, 2026
OTX tags 2026-09activeall-domainsblocklistcontentcryptodomainsdrainerfraudlivemonthlyphishdestroyphishingscam
Registrar Dynadot (Unknown)
Abuse contactabuse@rashost.com
ICANN RegistryICANN Lookup (RDAP) →
WHOIS LookupICANN RDAP for aelford.shop →
RegistrationCreated May 14, 2026 (155d)
Time to First Unavailability 35h
What we count Elapsed time from the first stored abuse report to the first observation that the content was unavailable. This does not establish the cause.
What each report contains Stored outgoing-report records may reference evidence available at the time, such as vendor verdicts, registration data, hosting details, classifications, or screenshots. This page does not infer the exact payload delivered, receipt, acknowledgement, or action by a recipient.
Technical detailsProvenance & timestamps
First DetectedSep 9, 2026
Submitted URLhttp://aelford.shop/
Favicon Hash
Case ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT

Accreditation and RAA context
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations

For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.

Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.

RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.

Accreditation is a contract, not a safety seal. Verify ICANN fees Read RAA §3.18 PHISHDESTROY INVESTIGATIONICANN funding, contracts, and DNS abuse oversight
Accountability draft Nothing is sent automatically.

Network & certificates

Stored technical evidence

Network & DNS

Resolved IP
195.96.131.106
Network ASN
AS199242
Organization
Beijing Ruihao Kai Yuan Technology Co
Observed location
Los Angeles, US
Nameservers 1
  • millie.ns.cloudflare.com

Location describes the IP network.

TLS certificate

Issuer
Let's Encrypt / YE2
Valid from
2026-07-13 12:32:26
Valid until
2026-10-11 12:32:25
Hostname coverage
Hostname coverage not recorded
Validity
Stored certificate expired
Collection time
2026-09-09 16:02:08 UTC
Collection source
PhishDestroy collector
Certificate fingerprint33630bd50c3f7a451f19986b9fbdea0e1eb7b08abe34234bbb7bd42b1f400ecb

Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.

viewdns.info · 195.96.131.106rapiddns.io

Latest Classified Outcome 2026-10-16 20:22:38 UTC

Primary outcome DNS inactive reason: DNS NXDOMAIN 80% confidence
Attribution source: Dns Cache
Evidence layers Availability: DNS inactive Content: Unreachable DNS: NXDOMAIN Registration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation Unknown Probe Inconclusive 20% 2026-10-17 01:12:49 UTC
RDAP registration Unknown
Observed timeline last reachable: 2026-09-09 22:14:38 UTC current episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC observed RIP window: 2026-09-09 22:14:38 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 498.00h midpoint estimate ≈ 2026-09-20 07:14:46 UTC · precision low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Technologies · 1 identified
Detected via Cloudflare Radar · Wappalyzer engine
Report This Domain Submit evidence & help protect others

VirusTotal Analysis

2 / 89 security vendors flagged this domain
View on VT
Last analyzed First positive detection Previous stored snapshot: 2 detections
alphaMountain.ai
SOCRadar
Site Performance Analysis

Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of aelford.shop · checked Sep 9, 2026

81
Needs Work
Performance
FCP
2.87s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
3.46s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0.038
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
227ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
3.83s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good 50-89 Needs Work 0-49 Poor
Registration & observation details8

Availability observations

Last reachable observation
Outcome first observed
Observation window starts
Observation window ends
Estimated change time
Observation window · hours
498
Estimate basis
Bounded by observations
Estimate precision
Low

An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.

Detection & evasion checks

Stored browser and crawler observations

Detection-evasion analysis

Cloaking and traffic-distribution check

Not yet scanned No crawler-versus-browser difference has been recorded yet

Stored crawler-versus-browser observations for this host, plus a live fingerprint check for Keitaro-style traffic distribution systems.

Stored cloaking flag
Not yet scanned
Last cloaking scan

Scanner note: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='aelford.shop', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("S

Live TDS fingerprint check
Seven Keitaro fingerprints and a browser-versus-crawler comparison. A new scan starts only when you press the button.
Saved result
Unreachable

Timeline & response

1 · outbound report records

Forensic History & Detection Timeline

ThreatLifecycleTelemetry
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
  1. Domain Status Transition 2026-09-11 01:19:55 UTC
    Source: PhishDestroy monitoring
    Event details
    Domain state transitioned from alive to dead.
  2. VirusTotal Detections Update 2026-09-10 12:41:43 UTC
    Source: VirusTotal
    Event details
    VirusTotal scanner detections updated from 1 to 2. Added scanner alerts: SOCRadar.
  3. VirusTotal Detections Update 2026-09-10 10:04:16 UTC
    Source: VirusTotal
    Event details
    VirusTotal scanner detections updated from 0 to 1. Added scanner alerts: alphaMountain.ai.
  4. VirusTotal Detections Update 2026-09-10 01:00:25 UTC
    Source: VirusTotal
    Event details
    VirusTotal scanner detections updated from 12 to 0. Resolved alerts: BitDefender, CRDF, ESET, Fortinet, G-Data, Gridinsoft, LevelBlue, Netcraft, SOCRadar, VIPRE, Webroot, alphaMountain.ai.
  5. VirusTotal Detections Update 2026-09-09 15:44:02 UTC
    Source: VirusTotal
    Event details
    VirusTotal scanner detections updated from 11 to 12. Added scanner alerts: SOCRadar.
  6. Threat First Observed 2026-09-09 14:10:29 UTC
    Source: PhishDestroy monitoring
    Event details
    Domain ingestion complete. Initial state is marked as alive pointing to IP 195.96.131.106.
Stored observation history22

Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.

  1. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    dns_inactive→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  2. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→dns_inactive

    dns_nxdomain

  3. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    dns_inactive→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  4. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→dns_inactive

    dns_nxdomain

  5. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    dns_inactive→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

Earlier observations 17
  1. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→dns_inactive

    dns_nxdomain

  2. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    dns_inactive→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  3. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→dns_inactive

    dns_nxdomain

  4. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    dns_inactive→Unknown

    probe_inconclusive

  5. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→dns_inactive

    dns_nxdomain

  6. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    dns_inactive→Unknown

    origin_unreachable · http_5xx

  7. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→dns_inactive

    dns_nxdomain

  8. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    dns_inactive→Unknown

    origin_unreachable · http_5xx

  9. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Unknown→dns_inactive

    dns_nxdomain

  10. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    dns_inactive→Unknown

    origin_unreachable · http_5xx

  11. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    dns_inactive

    dns_nxdomain

  12. Availability monitor · Recorded state

    Reachable→Unavailable

  13. VirusTotal · Detection count

    1→2

  14. VirusTotal · Detection count

    0→1

  15. VirusTotal · Detection count

    12→Observation retained

  16. VirusTotal · Detection count

    11→12

  17. Availability monitor · First collection record

    Reachable

Threat Response Pipeline

Discovery
Analysis
Notifications
Monitoring

19 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.

Threat Ingested
aelford.shop detected and queued for full analysis
Sep 9, 2026
Spamhaus DBL
Spamhaus DBL recorded DBL_SPAM
Sep 9, 2026
URLScan.io Capture
Stored URLScan report with capture artifacts
Sep 9, 2026
URLScan Verdict
URLScan returned a malicious verdict · score 100
Sep 9, 2026
Cloudflare Radar Report
A stored Cloudflare Radar report is available. The report link alone is not a malicious verdict and does not prove that every network field was captured.
VirusTotal
2/89 recorded on VirusTotal
Sep 10, 2026
OTX Community References
4 community publication references on AlienVault OTX. References are not vendor verdicts and are excluded from the evidence score.
Sep 10, 2026
Brand Impersonation
Impersonation of Fakeshop
Forensic Evidence Collected
Stored evidence from URLScan.io, URLQuery, stored screenshot
Sep 9, 2026
Technical Analysis Recorded
The report contains stored technology or forensic-analysis results.
Oct 17, 2026
Content Observed Unavailable
Monitoring recorded an unavailable response; the cause was not independently established.
Sep 11, 2026
VT Detection +1
+1 new detection (1 → 2): SOCRadar
Sep 10, 2026
VT Detection +1
+1 new detection (0 → 1): alphaMountain.ai
Sep 10, 2026
VT Detection -12
12 detections removed (12 → 0)
Sep 10, 2026
VT Detection +1
+1 new detection (11 → 12): SOCRadar
Sep 9, 2026
Sent Report Recorded
Stored outgoing record associated with registrar Dynadot Inc., 1 abuse contact
abuse@rashost.com
Sep 9, 2026
DestroyList Published
Listed in the public PhishDestroy/DestroyList repository
Sep 9, 2026
Content Observed Unavailable
The latest stored checks indicate that the reported content is unavailable; this does not establish who or what caused the change.
Sep 11, 2026
Time to First Unavailability
35 hours elapsed from detection to the first unavailable observation.
How we investigate & report

Public scans, evidence and abuse channels

We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.

01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups
urlscan.io Screenshot · DOM · HTTP

Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.

VirusTotal Multi-engine verdicts

Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.

Cloudflare Radar DNS · certificates · categories

Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.

AlienVault OTX Threat-intelligence pulses

Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.

Wayback Machine Historical evidence

Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.

crt.sh Certificate Transparency

Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.

DNS Security Filters Quad9 · AdGuard · CleanBrowsing

Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.

Web-Check Surface inspection

Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.

02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels
  1. Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
  2. Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
  3. Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
  4. Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.

Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.

GoogleSafe Browsing GoogleWeb Risk MicrosoftSmartScreen VirusTotalURL analysis CloudflareRadar / abuse reporting YandexSafe Browsing URLScan.ioPublic scan ESETSample / URL submission BitdefenderURL submission NortonSafe Web SymantecSiteReview AviraURL reporting Avast / AVGURL reporting KasperskyOpenTIP Dr.WebOnline scanner NetcraftAbuse reporting PhishTankCommunity reporting APWG eCXPhishing intelligence PhishStatsPublic feed Phish.ReportHosting abuse SpamhausDomain reputation PolySwarmMulti-engine analysis CheckPhishURL scan QutteraMalware scan URLqueryBrowser analysis Criminal IPAsset intelligence CRDFThreat Center ScamadviserReputation check MyWOTCommunity reputation

Related infrastructure

Shared hosting, registrar records and related domains

Evidence & investigation tools

Original reports, independent checks and evidence links

Evidence & External Reports

Security Analysis
URLScan Malicious VirusTotal 2 det. ChainPatrol URLQuery 1 threat alert SSL Labs Hostname coverage not recorded CF Radar Open report OTX 4 refs WOT ScamAdviser Blacklist Checker URLVoid Sucuri SiteCheck MDN Observatory
Submitted Evidence Snapshot
Sent: Ledger records: 1 Case ID: PD-20260909-DE069E Recipient: abuse@rashost.com
Page title stored with report: Global Streetwear Brand | Aelfric Eden
PDF notice generated Notice text archived (650 chars)
Abuse notice text as sent to the provider 
Policy Violations:
Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims
Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services
Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses
Applicable Laws (Unknown):
International Anti-Cybercrime Regulations
Budapest Convention on Cybercrime
Universal Fraud Prevention Laws
Phishing activities violate international cybercrime conventions and Unknown's domestic fraud laws.
Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
OSINT & Intelligence
Web-Check Full scan SOCRadar Dark web report LeakIX Leak search Shodan Censys ThreatFox Hudson Rock Sign-in search IntelX crt.sh Certs WHOIS Wayback
DNS & Network
nslookup.io DNS bgp.tools ASN/Route
SEO & Domain
SpyFu Moz DA/PA Ahrefs Backlinks
Deep Analysis
Deep Analysis

Help & reporting

Recovery steps, reporting contacts and complaint drafts

Help & reporting

Were You Affected by This Site?

6 evidence signal groups linked 1 stored notification records Content unavailable
If credentials were compromised, report immediately. Do not engage with recovery scammers.

If credentials, payment data, or files were exposed, report the incident immediately. Change affected passwords, revoke active sessions, and scan the device.

Immediate steps Find reporting contacts
Official reporting routes
PhishDestroy listing review Not a law-enforcement report
Domain Appeal
Request a review if you own this domain and believe the listing is incorrect
Beware of recovery scammers! Recovery scammers may pose as investigators, lawyers, or tracing services. Do not pay upfront fees or disclose credentials. Learn more about recovery fraud →
Report to Your Local Authorities

Select your country to get official cybercrime contacts, or create a complaint draft →.

97-country directory

Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent

Template-based draft • optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent · Review and submit it yourself
After a phishing incident

Recommendations & Advice for Victims

Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.

What should I do immediately?

Urgent

Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.

  • Change all passwords — email, exchange accounts, anything that shares the same password
  • Enable 2FA using an authenticator app (not SMS). Disable SMS-based recovery
  • Freeze cards if you entered banking details on the phishing site

What information should I collect for my report?

FBI guidelines

Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗

  • Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
  • Exact dates & times — of each transaction and first contact with scammer
  • Screenshots — scam website, chat messages, emails, wallet transactions, social media
  • All URLs & domains used by the scammer (including aelford.shop)
  • Communications — emails, texts, phone numbers, usernames the scammer used

Even if you don't have all details — file a report anyway. Partial information still helps investigations.

Where should I report the scam?

  • FBI IC3 — Internet Crime Complaint Center (US federal reporting)
  • Europol — European cybercrime reporting (EU)
  • Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
  • Local police — creates an official record, even if they can't act immediately

A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.

How do phishing scams typically work?

  • Fake websites — pixel-perfect clones of legitimate sites with slightly altered domains
  • Pig butchering — trust built over weeks via Telegram/WhatsApp/dating apps, then money stolen
  • Recovery scams — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
  • AI-powered scams — deepfakes, automated phishing, and AI-generated sites making fraud harder to detect

How can I protect myself in the future?

  • Bookmark official sites — never click links from emails, DMs, or ads
  • Verify domains — check on PhishDestroy before interacting. Check HTTPS, spelling, domain age
  • "Too good to be true" = scam — guaranteed returns, celebrity endorsements, urgent deadlines

Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams

Check Any Domain

Threat analysis using stored blocklist, WHOIS, DNS, and public scan evidence

Scan Now

Report Phishing

Submit suspicious domains to our threat database — protect the community

Report

Live Threat Feed

Recent phishing reports and observed availability changes

Monitor

Stay Informed, Stay Safe

Monitor live threats or contest this listing if you believe it's a false positive

Live Threat Feed Appeal This Listing
Read the evidence in context

About This Report: aelford.shop

Stored evidence snapshot. Source timestamps appear where available.

Captured title: “Global Streetwear Brand | Aelfric Eden”. Apparent target: Fakeshop.

VirusTotal detections for aelford.shop: 2 (2026-09-10 20:57:40 UTC).

Each source records a particular observation. A screenshot, an available website, or a result with no detections does not establish that a site is safe. Source results can change after they are collected.

submit an appeal or review the FAQ page.

Embed this report

A compact widget with a link to the evidence

HTML · IFRAME

Embed This Report

Share this threat intelligence on your website or blog

embed.html 
<iframe
  src="https://phishdestroy.io/embed/domain/aelford.shop"
  title="PhishDestroy threat report for aelford.shop"
  width="100%" height="320"
  loading="lazy"
  referrerpolicy="no-referrer"
  sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px;max-width:100%"
></iframe>