VirusTotal
1 / 93 engine detections
Open reportadpend.capital is an Across impersonation page detected by PhishDestroy on 2026-02-26. Risk: high (55/100). Status: Content unavailable. Hosting: HETZNER-AS Hetzner Online GmbH, DE. VirusTotal: 1/93 engines flag it. Do not enter credentials or connect a wallet.
“Adpend Labs - Consistent DeFi Yield, Verified by Experts”
1 / 93 engine detections
Open reportno community references
Open reportNo threat flag
Open reportNo malicious flag
Open reportResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain adpend.capital was registered on February 21, 2026 and is presently taken offline. DNS resolution points to the IP address 91.99.199.199, which is hosted in Germany by Hetzner Online GmbH under ASN 24940. The server presented an SSL certificate labeled “E8”, indicating a potentially self‑signed or low‑trust certificate. The site’s HTML title reads “Adpend Labs - Consistent DeFi Yield, Verified by Experts”, a phrasing commonly used in cryptocurrency‑yield fraud campaigns.
Intelligence flags the domain as a crypto‑scam that impersonates the brand Across, matching the “brand impersonation” threat type recorded in the source data. The domain appears on a single security blocklist and has been flagged by PhishDestroy. VirusTotal analysis shows that one of ninety‑three scanning engines reported the domain as malicious, reinforcing the suspicion of malicious intent. Because the site is currently offline, active probing is limited, and the exact content served at the time of operation cannot be confirmed beyond the page title.
Defenders should continue to monitor the associated IP 91.99.199.199 for any resurrection of services, add the domain to blocklists at the network perimeter, and enforce strict outbound filtering for cryptocurrency‑related traffic to mitigate potential lure attempts. Incident response teams should also audit any logs for connections to this IP or hostname during the window between registration and the observed takedown, as adversaries may have leveraged the short‑lived domain for credential harvesting or fund‑drainage campaigns. Further analysis of the SSL certificate chain and any residual TLS fingerprints could aid attribution to the hosting provider and inform future threat‑intel sharing.
No. PhishDestroy classifies adpend.capital as an Across impersonation page (risk: high, 55/100); it was first detected on 2026-02-26. VirusTotal: 1/93 engines flag it. Treat the site as unsafe.
No. Do not connect a wallet, sign messages or approve tokens on adpend.capital. Phishing sites ask for approvals (approve, setApprovalForAll, Permit2) that let the operator move your assets, and a confirmed transaction cannot be reversed.
Change every password you entered there and turn on two-factor authentication. If you connected a wallet or signed something, revoke the approvals and move the remaining funds to a new wallet; never share your seed phrase. Step-by-step help: emergency guide.
Location describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='adpend.capital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError(
adpend.capital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Unknown→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
No threat flag
View sourceadpend.capital
View source1/93 engine detections
View source307 stored lookalike domains
Showing 100 of 307
Reported by 1 community member, first seen Sep 8, 2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
If credentials, payment data, or files were exposed, report the incident immediately. Change affected passwords, revoke active sessions, and scan the device.
Select your country to get official cybercrime contacts, or create a complaint draft →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
adpend.capital)Even if you don't have all details — file a report anyway. Partial information still helps investigations.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Threat analysis using stored blocklist, WHOIS, DNS, and public scan evidence
Scan NowSubmit suspicious domains to our threat database — protect the community
ReportRecent phishing reports and observed availability changes
MonitorMonitor live threats or contest this listing if you believe it's a false positive
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.