VirusTotal
4 / 91
“Fortnite Rank & Locker Value Checker – Free Tool | Fntm”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@ufocorp.net.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 27 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
fntm.monster — Nicht bestätigt. Markenidentität: Epicgames; Betrugstyp: Impersonation. Zusammenfassung der Beweislage: VirusTotal 4/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, SOCRadar, desenmascara.me); URLScan malicious verdict; PhishDestroy score 81/100. Registrar: Gname.
Die ausführliche Analyse von PhishDestroy AI bleibt auf Englisch, damit der ursprüngliche forensische Bericht unverändert bleibt.
On 2026-10-01, fntm.monster returned an HTTP status code of 200 in a recorded check of the domain. The same record set shows a registration date of 2026-07-20 with Gname.com Pte. Ltd. listed as registrar.
The PhishDestroy internal listing for fntm.monster was recorded as true, and a PageSpeed check on 2026-09-16 returned a performance score of 74. An SSL scan on 2026-09-17 identified the certificate issuer as Let's Encrypt / YE1. VirusTotal recorded 4 detections across 91 scanners on 2026-09-29. OTX recorded 4 pulses on 2026-09-19.
The HTTP check, PageSpeed check, SSL scan, VirusTotal check and OTX check carry different observation dates, so their values describe separate points in time rather than one synchronized snapshot. Because the PhishDestroy listing and the OTX pulses were recorded on different dates, a reader can compare them only as distinct dated observations. The VirusTotal detections and total scanners likewise reflect the state recorded on 2026-09-29, not any later condition.
Anyone reviewing fntm.monster should retain the dated records from PhishDestroy, VirusTotal, OTX and the HTTP check so later observations can be compared against them. Subsequent checks of fntm.monster should be logged with their own dates and values rather than merged with the existing entries. During review, avoid submitting sensitive information to the domain until the recorded observations have been independently verified.
Gespeicherte Beobachtungen zum Vergleich zwischen Crawler und Browser für diesen Host sowie eine Echtzeit-Fingerabdruckprüfung für Verkehrsverteilungssysteme im Keitaro-Stil.
Anmerkung des Scanners: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='fntm.monster', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("S
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
a.dnspod.comb.dnspod.comc.dnspod.comLocation describes the IP network.
8089f294500b0de01b140d579556e056ec3d5a5c24f871ae938571052c54788aSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of fntm.monster · checked Sep 16, 2026
109.238.86.76. 16 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
PD-20260916-19667E Recipient: abuse@ufocorp.net Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
Wenn Sie Kontoanmeldeinformationen, persönliche oder Zahlungsinformationen eingegeben oder eine Datei von dieser Domain heruntergeladen haben, ergreifen Sie sofort Maßnahmen. Nachfolgend finden Sie Ressourcen, die Ihnen helfen, den Vorfall zu melden und sich zu schützen.
Wählen Sie Ihr Land aus, um Offizielle Kontakte im Bereich Cyberkriminalität oder einen Beschwerdeentwurf erstellen → zu erhalten.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Bedrohungsanalyse anhand gespeicherter Blocklisten, WHOIS, DNS und öffentlicher Scan-Beweise
Jetzt scannenMelden Sie verdächtige Domains an unsere Bedrohungsdatenbank – schützen Sie die Community
MeldenAktuelle Phishing-Meldungen und beobachtete Verfügbarkeitsänderungen
ÜberwachenBeobachten Sie aktuelle Bedrohungen oder legen Sie Widerspruch gegen diesen Eintrag ein, wenn Sie der Meinung sind, dass es sich um einen Fehlalarm handelt