VirusTotal
7 / 91
“Problem loading page”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is complaint@gname.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 14 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
catfee.network — Letzter bekanntermaßen aktiv (HTTP 200). Betrugstyp: Impersonation. Zusammenfassung der Beweislage: VirusTotal 7/91 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, LevelBlue, SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score 88/100. Registrar: GNAME.COM.
Die ausführliche Analyse von PhishDestroy AI bleibt auf Englisch, damit der ursprüngliche forensische Bericht unverändert bleibt.
7 / 91
Report stored; detailed verdict not recorded
Melden4 community references
Meldenprovider verdict: clean
Meldengespeicherter Bericht
Melden Analyse abgeschlossen
MeldenChecked; no threat flag recorded
Meldencatfee.network returned HTTP status 200 on 2026-10-01, according to the recorded HTTP check. The domain was first observed on 2026-09-29, and its registration date is recorded as 2026-08-07.
The PhishDestroy internal listing records catfee.network as listed, with that catalogue checked on 2026-10-01. VirusTotal recorded 1 detection across 91 scanners on 2026-09-29. OTX showed 4 pulses when checked on 2026-10-01. The SSL certificate was scanned on 2026-09-29 and its issuer is recorded as Let's Encrypt / YR1. PageSpeed recorded a performance score of 95 on 2026-09-29.
The PhishDestroy listing and the OTX pulse count were both checked on 2026-10-01, so those two observations share a date and can be compared directly. The VirusTotal detection count and the SSL scan come from 2026-09-29, two days earlier, so they describe an earlier point than the listing and pulse records. The HTTP response and first-observed dates differ by two days, which limits how closely those records can be aligned.
Anyone reviewing catfee.network should retain the dated records from PhishDestroy, OTX, VirusTotal, PageSpeed and the HTTP check so later observations can be compared against them. A subsequent check of the same sources on a new date would show whether the recorded values have changed. During review, avoid submitting passwords, payment details or other sensitive information to the site.
Gespeicherte Beobachtungen zum Vergleich zwischen Crawler und Browser für diesen Host sowie eine Echtzeit-Fingerabdruckprüfung für Verkehrsverteilungssysteme im Keitaro-Stil.
ddos-guardAnmerkung des Scanners: alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=ddos-guard
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
a.share-dns.comb.share-dns.netLocation describes the IP network.
a01d2f97e0552b9d049b41c6fc81558ec8fda687adc819f75c8548c1616d824dSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of catfee.network · checked Sep 29, 2026
186.2.175.25. 13 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
PD-20260929-8551D4 Recipient: complaint@gname.com Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
Wenn Sie Kontoanmeldeinformationen, persönliche oder Zahlungsinformationen eingegeben oder eine Datei von dieser Domain heruntergeladen haben, ergreifen Sie sofort Maßnahmen. Nachfolgend finden Sie Ressourcen, die Ihnen helfen, den Vorfall zu melden und sich zu schützen.
Wählen Sie Ihr Land aus, um Offizielle Kontakte im Bereich Cyberkriminalität oder einen Beschwerdeentwurf erstellen → zu erhalten.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Bedrohungsanalyse anhand gespeicherter Blocklisten, WHOIS, DNS und öffentlicher Scan-Beweise
Jetzt scannenMelden Sie verdächtige Domains an unsere Bedrohungsdatenbank – schützen Sie die Community
MeldenAktuelle Phishing-Meldungen und beobachtete Verfügbarkeitsänderungen
ÜberwachenBeobachten Sie aktuelle Bedrohungen oder legen Sie Widerspruch gegen diesen Eintrag ein, wenn Sie der Meinung sind, dass es sich um einen Fehlalarm handelt