VirusTotal
7 / 89
إبلاغEngine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
“Security Check”
Assessment based on the stored source evidence below. Review sources →
trezor-s.io — المحتوى غير متوفر. انتحال العلامة التجارية: Trezor; نوع الاحتيال: Impersonation. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 7/89 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky); URLQuery 2 alerts; URLScan malicious verdict; Spamhaus DBL_SPAM; 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 100/100. مسجّل النطاق: Gransy, s.r.o.
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
These are dated observations, not a live safety check. No flag, a stored capture, or a completed analysis does not establish that a site is safe.
7 / 89
إبلاغEngine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
2 threat-system alerts
إبلاغAlerts refer to the preserved scan. They do not describe the current state of the site.
malicious
إبلاغThis is the recorded automated analysis. Completion alone is not a safety verdict.
2 external matches
التفاصيلA result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
DBL_SPAM
A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
3 community references
إبلاغCommunity publication references, not a vendor verdict or evidence of a common operator.
provider verdict: clean
A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
التقرير المخزن
View stored capture ↗ إبلاغA preserved page image documents what the collector received; a capture is not a safety verdict.
80/100
A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
Checked; no threat flag recorded
إبلاغA result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
AI-assisted analysis Stored narrative · generated . Provider checks below retain their own observation dates. This narrative is an interpretation of collected evidence, not an independent source verdict.
Stored evidence for trezor-s.io: VirusTotal recorded 7 detections among 89 scanners on 2026-09-19. That ratio reproduces the stored check in its original units and is not converted into another measure. MetaMask and SEAL appear as named external blocklist observations for trezor-s.io. Each item in this report remains at the scope supplied by its dated source record.
VirusTotal records 7 detections among 89 scanners in the stored snapshot dated 2026-09-19. The numerator describes scanners that produced detections, while the denominator describes scanners included in that check. The reverse order would materially alter the stored result. The VirusTotal snapshot dated 2026-09-19 supplies no common rationale covering the included scanners, and this report adds none. A later VirusTotal snapshot may contain different values, so any comparison should preserve the exact ratio and date of each snapshot.
MetaMask and SEAL are recorded as named external blocklist observations for trezor-s.io in the snapshot dated 2026-09-19. The stored MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records supply names and entries, but they supply no shared method or common rationale. PhishDestroy’s catalogue also contains trezor-s.io as a publisher record. That PhishDestroy record is counted separately from the MetaMask and SEAL external blocklist observations. This separation keeps the origin of every entry visible and prevents a single stored item from being counted again under another source label.
The record first observed trezor-s.io on 2026-09-19. The MetaMask and SEAL blocklist snapshot is dated 2026-09-19 and remains a separate event in the stored timeline. The registration date is separately recorded as 2026-08-28. A URLScan reference was stored on 2026-09-19 as a dated artifact for review. Each timestamp qualifies only the adjacent observation in this timeline. Later collection results should be compared with these dated values without replacing the earlier snapshot.
For trezor-s.io, the registrar field records Gransy, s.r.o.; this is kept as an exact source value. The source stores 45.74.7.27 as the observed address in this record. The registration date for trezor-s.io is recorded as 2026-08-28. These fields preserve registration, network, and certificate context stored in this record. The report preserves each label and number as a separate source value instead of combining them into an invented aggregate. Keeping the fields separate leaves every infrastructure value traceable to the record that supplied it.
The trezor-s.io record states that VirusTotal recorded 7 detections among 89 scanners on 2026-09-19. MetaMask and SEAL remain named blocklist observations from the snapshot dated 2026-09-19. PhishDestroy remains a separate publisher catalogue entry in the stored record. For trezor-s.io, the registrar field records Gransy, s.r.o.; this remains separate from the other source fields. The observed address field in this record contains 45.74.7.27. The supported conclusion is bounded to the exact stored observations for trezor-s.io. Any statement beyond those source values would require additional dated material.
Avoid submitting sensitive information to trezor-s.io during review. Use a known service address obtained separately from this report for any necessary access. Defenders can retain trezor-s.io as an exact indicator and preserve relevant DNS, proxy, and endpoint records. Compare later VirusTotal snapshots and MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records with the dated values above instead of replacing them. Keep each later observation with its source date so changes remain visible during follow-up review. If a defensive rule is needed, keep its scope to trezor-s.io. The stored record does not justify extending that rule to 45.74.7.27 or to other infrastructure records.
21 · datasets with records / 10 · not recorded
What this report contains, where it came from, and when it was collected. A retained record can be incomplete; collection status is separate from the threat assessment.
These checks have no retained result. This does not mean they passed or that a scan is running.
2 · external source matches
Gransy, s.r.o. · 45.74.7.27 · DNS, TLS and retained responses
breeze.majahan.comjuniper.majahan.comLocation describes the IP network.
998baf36d2940e8dd4eef8e431896d0fc9cf71b978a3e04d50d7c6b4d7f59574Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Stored browser and crawler observations
الملاحظات المخزنة المتعلقة بالمقارنة بين برامج الزحف والمتصفح لهذا المضيف، بالإضافة إلى فحص مباشر للبصمة الرقمية لأنظمة توزيع حركة المرور على غرار «كيتارو».
ملاحظة خاصة بالماسح الضوئي: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='trezor-s.io', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("SO
1 · outbound report records
45.74.7.27.Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→غير معروف
probe_inconclusive
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→غير معروف
probe_inconclusive
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→غير معروف
probe_inconclusive
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→غير معروف
probe_inconclusive
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→غير معروف
origin_unreachable · http_5xx
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→غير معروف
origin_unreachable · http_5xx
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→غير معروف
origin_unreachable · http_5xx
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
يمكن الوصول إليه→غير متوفر
يمكن الوصول إليه
16 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
Shared hosting, registrar records and related domains
٧٤ نطاقًا متشابهًا محفوظًا
Retained community reports and observations
بلاغ مجتمعي واحد
الفئةIMPERSONATION
Phishing: impersonation, fake affiliation, cloaking, seo poisoning, impersonating Trezor
Original reports, independent checks and evidence links
“Phishing: impersonation, fake affiliation, cloaking, seo poisoning, impersonating Trezor”
PD-20260919-13E2A8 Recipient: abuse@virtualine.org Policy Violations: Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses Applicable Laws (Unknown): International Anti-Cybercrime Regulations Budapest Convention on Cybercrime Universal Fraud Prevention Laws Phishing activities violate international cybercrime conventions and Unknown's domestic fraud laws. Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
Recovery steps, reporting contacts and complaint drafts
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
trezor-s.io)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
يقدم هذا التقرير أحدث الأدلة المخزنة المتاحة لـ PhishDestroy. يتم عرض الطوابع الزمنية للمصدر حيثما كان ذلك متاحًا؛ يمكن أن تتغير أحكام التوفر والبائعين بعد التجميع.
عرض الموقع الذي تم التقاطه عنوان الصفحة “Security Check” وربما ينتحل شخصية Trezor.
اعتبارًا من 2026-09-19 07:44:34 UTC، كان لدى trezor-s.io اكتشافات من محركات الأمان 7.
Each source records a particular observation. A screenshot, an available website, or a result with no detections does not establish that a site is safe. Source results can change after they are collected.
إذا كنت تعتقد أن هذه القائمة غير دقيقة، تقديم استئناف. للتعرف على منهجيتنا، قم بزيارة صفحة الأسئلة الشائعة.