VirusTotal
12 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقرير“sede-dgt-gob-es.pandjul.com”
تصيد: sede-dgt-gob-es.pandjul.com — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 12/91 (BitDefender, CRDF, CyRadar, Fortinet, G-Data); URLQuery 2 det.…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
12 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقرير2 det.
فتح التقريرno community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
sede-dgt-gob-es.pandjul.com is an impersonation phishing page. Its hostname copies the naming of the electronic office (sede electrónica) of Spain's Dirección General de Tráfico (DGT), which makes drivers and vehicle owners in Spain its targets. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-09-23. The site went offline on 2026-09-24, and on 2026-10-19 its DNS still did not resolve.
DGT impersonation scams usually start with an SMS or email about a pending traffic fine, an unpaid toll, or a problem with a driving licence or vehicle registration. The link opens a page made to look like the official portal. It asks for personal details and then a small payment to settle the matter. Victims hand over full card data, including the CVV and often the one-time bank code, plus ID and contact details that can be reused for more fraud. The page title showed only the hostname, so the deception depended on the government-style address, not on visible branding.
On 2026-09-25, 12 of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the address. The vendors included BitDefender, CRDF, CyRadar, Fortinet, G-Data, Gridinsoft, LevelBlue and Lionic. That is a minority of engines, but several independent commercial vendors reached the same verdict, which supports the classification. PhishDestroy is the only blocklist that lists it.
The parent domain was registered on 2020-02-28 through Web Commerce Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc, more than six years before this DGT-style subdomain appeared. The parent name has no connection to Spanish government services. All of the government branding sits in the subdomain prefix, which suggests the impersonation was added to an existing domain rather than registered for the purpose. Hosting was on the PT. DEWATA TELEMATIKA network in Indonesia, far from the Spanish audience it targeted. The page stayed online for about a day after PhishDestroy first detected it.
If you entered card details on this page, call your bank immediately to block the card and dispute any charges. Watch your statements for small test transactions. If you also typed in an SMS code from your bank, tell the bank, because that code may have approved a payment. If you gave your DNI/NIE, address or phone number, expect convincing follow-up messages, and check any fine only through official DGT channels you open yourself. Defenders should block the domain and the hosting IP 111.221.42.175 and flag SMS and emails that link to hostnames imitating Spanish government services.
ns58c.daxa.netns59c.daxa.netLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of sede-dgt-gob-es.pandjul.com · checked Sep 23, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
يمكن الوصول إليه→غير متوفر
No threat flag
View source12/91 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260923-B4DC15
Page captured
View sourcesede-dgt-gob-es.pandjul.com
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
sede-dgt-gob-es.pandjul.com
PD-20260923-B4DC15 Recipient: abuse@daxa.net إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
sede-dgt-gob-es.pandjul.com)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.