VirusTotal
5 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقرير“proposal-safix.com”
نطاق في قوائم الحظر: proposal-safix.com — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 5/91 (CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar, VIPRE); 2…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
5 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقريرSuspicious
فتح التقرير3 community references
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
proposal-safix.com is an impersonation phishing page built to pass itself off as a legitimate crypto service and lure wallet users into acting on a fake request. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-09-23, one day after the domain was registered. The site has been offline since 2026-09-28, and its DNS was still inactive at the last check on 2026-10-19.
The page title only repeats the domain name, so it does not show which service was being copied. The word "proposal" in the name fits a common lure in which victims are told a transaction, vote or governance proposal is waiting for their review. Pages like this push the visitor to connect a wallet and sign what looks like a routine approval, or to type in a seed phrase or login. A signed approval can let the operator move tokens out of the wallet, and a seed phrase hands over the wallet completely.
On 2026-09-27, 5 of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar and VIPRE. That count is modest, but the listings carry more weight. MetaMask's own blocklist and the SEAL blocklist both include it alongside PhishDestroy, which means wallet-focused defenders also treated it as a threat to crypto users. Three AlienVault OTX pulses reference the domain as well.
The domain was registered through Spaceship, Inc. on 2026-09-22 and was already flagged the next day. It went dark about six days after registration, which is typical of disposable phishing domains built for a short campaign. Traffic ran through Cloudflare, Inc. on an address geolocated to Canada, so the network hides where the real server is hosted. The free Let's Encrypt certificate gave the page a padlock, which says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
If you connected a wallet to this site, use a token-approval checker to revoke any permissions granted around 2026-09-23 to 2026-09-28, and move your funds if you signed anything you did not understand. If you entered a seed phrase, treat that wallet as compromised: create a new wallet on a clean device and transfer your assets to it right away. Do not act on "proposal" or approval requests that arrive through links. Open the real service by typing its address yourself. Defenders should block the domain, search DNS and proxy logs for lookups between registration and takedown, and watch for related names built on the same "proposal" wording.
Last checked
لا تُنسب سمعة Edge-IP إلى هذا المجال.
Location describes the IP network.
a60b89ed78e39d1e66f7fce564e9fcb5da2f47f82096bf23017c7622a8e5ba18Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
يمكن الوصول إليه→غير متوفر
0→1
No threat flag
View source5/91 engine detections
View source3 community references
View sourceproposal-safix.com
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
proposal-safix.com
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
proposal-safix.com)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.