VirusTotal
6 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Polyester — A network of networks”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@whiteprivacy.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 27 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
تصيد: emberhash.net — آخر نشاط معروف (HTTP 200). ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 6/91 (CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar, URLQuery); PhishDestroy…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
6 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقريرSuspicious
فتح التقرير15/100
فتح التقرير4 community references
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
emberhash.net is an impersonation phishing page that presents itself as "Polyester — A network of networks." It targets crypto users who expect to reach that project's official site. The domain name has no connection to the brand it displays. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-23, and the page was still online and serving content on 2026-10-19.
Impersonation pages like this copy a project's name, tagline and layout so a visitor believes they are on the genuine site. Victims usually arrive through search ads, social posts or direct messages. The page then pushes an action such as connecting a wallet, signing a transaction, claiming a reward or typing in a recovery phrase. Any of these hands control to the operator: a signed approval lets them move tokens, and a seed phrase gives them the whole wallet. Losses from these schemes are typically immediate and cannot be reversed.
On 2026-10-03, six of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar, URLQuery and desenmascara.me. That is a modest count, so most security tools would still let a visitor through without warning. Four AlienVault OTX threat pulses reference the domain, which shows other researchers have tracked it independently. PhishDestroy lists it on our blocklist.
The domain was registered on 2026-08-29 through Cloudflare, Inc., and PhishDestroy detected it about three and a half weeks later. That short gap fits a site set up specifically for this campaign rather than an older domain that was later compromised. It is hosted at 163.61.188.5 on the NEW DHAKA HARDWARE network in the US. Its free Let's Encrypt certificate shows a padlock in the browser, but the padlock says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
If you connected a wallet to emberhash.net, revoke every approval it was granted using a token-approval checker. Then move any remaining funds to a fresh wallet. If you entered a seed phrase or private key, treat that wallet as fully compromised and move funds immediately. Reach Polyester only through links from its verified official channels, and never through ads or unsolicited messages. Security teams should block the domain and its hosting IP and add it to wallet and browser warning lists.
clay.ns.cloudflare.comsofia.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
6285e03bbc69f3d43859848927e3b5021da994b2677e37fa6739a15ce3264714Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
airdrop.emberhash.netDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of emberhash.net · checked Sep 23, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
emberhash.net
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
2→3
1→2
0→1
No threat flag
View source6/91 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcePD-20260923-C40399
emberhash.net
View sourcePD-20260923-C40399 Recipient: abuse@whiteprivacy.com إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
emberhash.net)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.