VirusTotal
3 / 92 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Ledger”
انتحال Ledger: bridger.fi — آخر نشاط معروف (HTTP 200). ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 3/92 (Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar); 1 external blocklist…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
3 / 92 engine detections
فتح التقريرSuspicious
فتح التقرير4 community references
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
bridger.fi is an impersonation phishing page posing as Ledger, the hardware wallet maker. Its browser tab reads simply "Ledger". It targets people who own or are setting up a Ledger device. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-11, and as of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving its phishing content.
Ledger impersonation pages usually copy the brand's look and claim the visitor's device needs attention, such as a firmware update, a security check or a wallet sync. The goal is to get the victim to type their 24-word recovery phrase into the site or to connect and sign with their wallet. A recovery phrase entered on a web page gives the operator full control of every account derived from it, and they can empty those accounts without touching the physical device. The domain name says "bridger", not Ledger, so victims typically land on it through ads, direct messages or fake support replies rather than by searching for the brand.
Detection by security vendors is still thin. On 2026-10-16, only 3 of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar. A clean result from most scanners therefore says nothing about whether the site is safe. ScamSniffer, a wallet-focused blocklist, lists it independently alongside PhishDestroy. The domain also appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses.
The domain was registered on 2026-10-01 through Immaterialism Ltd, just ten days before PhishDestroy caught it. That short gap points to a site set up specifically for this campaign. It sits behind Cloudflare, with the address geolocated to Canada, which hides the actual origin server. It uses a free Let's Encrypt certificate, so the padlock in the browser only means the connection is encrypted, not that the site belongs to Ledger.
If you typed your recovery phrase into this site, treat the wallet as compromised. Generate a new phrase on your Ledger device and move any remaining funds to it immediately. Ledger never asks for your phrase online. If you connected a wallet or signed anything there, review and revoke token approvals with a trusted approval checker. Security teams should block bridger.fi at DNS and proxy level and report it to Cloudflare's abuse channel. They should also warn Ledger users in their communities that support will never request a recovery phrase.
Last checked
لا تُنسب سمعة Edge-IP إلى هذا المجال.
damian.ns.cloudflare.comkristina.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
261d44f198996bbe73b39ba068d35ce4b3c1908515c99d7806f89a0486769925Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of bridger.fi · checked Oct 12, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=cloudflare
bridger.fi
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
يمكن الوصول إليه
3/92 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View source4 community references
View sourcebridger.fi
View sourcePage captured
View source١٥١ نطاقًا متشابهًا محفوظًا
عرض 100 من 151
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
bridger.fi)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.