VirusTotal
11 / 91 engine detections
打开报告“waterfronthomesofnantucket.com”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@petaexpress.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 27 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
钓鱼: waterfronthomesofnantucket.com — 未验证. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 11/91 (ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CyRadar, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker); URLQuery 2…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
11 / 91 engine detections
打开报告2 det.
打开报告恶意
打开报告4 community references
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
waterfronthomesofnantucket.com is an impersonation phishing page. Its name reads like a listing site for waterfront homes on Nantucket, and the page title is simply the domain itself, so no specific brand is identified. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-09-23. On 2026-10-19 the domain still resolved, but its page content could not be loaded.
Impersonation pages copy the look or name of a legitimate business so visitors trust them enough to type in sensitive details. A domain that sounds like a property-listing service suits lures about viewings, rentals, deposits or account logins, where asking for contact details, credentials or payment seems normal. Whatever a victim enters goes straight to the operators. That can mean stolen passwords, exposed personal information, or money sent for a property that does not exist.
When VirusTotal checked the domain on 2026-10-02, 11 of 91 engines flagged it. The vendors included ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CyRadar, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data and Gridinsoft. That count is modest, but it comes from several unrelated security companies, so the verdict does not rest on one source. The domain also appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses, and PhishDestroy lists it on its blocklist.
The domain was registered on 2025-06-27 through Gname.com Pte. Ltd., roughly fifteen months before PhishDestroy detected it. A domain that sits that long before use was likely acquired in advance or repurposed, and the age can help it get past filters that distrust brand-new domains. It is hosted on the PEG TECH INC network in the United States.
If you entered a password on this site, change it now, and change it anywhere else you reuse it. Then turn on two-factor authentication. If you paid a deposit, booking fee or any other money, contact your bank or card issuer right away to dispute the charge. Do not send more funds if someone follows up asking for extra fees. Treat any calls or emails about Nantucket properties that refer to this site as part of the scam. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and web proxies, and search mail and proxy logs for users who reached it after 2026-09-23.
a.share-dns.coma11.share-dns.comb.share-dns.netb11.share-dns.netLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
m.waterfronthomesofnantucket.comDomain recordwww.waterfronthomesofnantucket.comDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
2→11
1→2
可访问
No threat flag
View source4 community references
View source11/91 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260923-4B01EA
waterfronthomesofnantucket.com
View sourcePage captured
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
waterfronthomesofnantucket.com
PD-20260923-4B01EA Recipient: abuse@petaexpress.com Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
waterfronthomesofnantucket.com)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.