VirusTotal
7 / 92 engine detections
打开报告“Top4top تحميل ملفات و رفع الصور”
冒充 Google: top4top.me — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 302). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 7/92 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data)…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
7 / 92 engine detections
打开报告4 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
top4top.me presents itself as Top4top, the Arabic-language file-sharing and image-hosting service, and PhishDestroy classifies it as an impersonation phishing page. It targets Arabic-speaking users who rely on Top4top to share downloads and host pictures. PhishDestroy first flagged the domain on 2026-10-07. As of 2026-10-19 it was still online and redirecting visitors elsewhere.
The page carries the title "Top4top تحميل ملفات و رفع الصور", which means "Top4top: file downloads and image uploads." That phrasing matches the real service, so a visitor who arrives from a shared link has little reason to doubt it. Impersonation pages of this kind ride on that trust. They push users toward downloads, ask them to sign in, or pass them on to other destinations. Victims can lose account credentials or end up running files that did not come from the service they think they are using. Because the domain now redirects, where a visitor lands can change at any time.
VirusTotal shows 7 of 92 engines flagging the domain as of 2026-10-09: alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar. That is a minority of engines. Still, it is a varied group spanning commercial antivirus, web filtering and a regional anti-phishing community, all reaching the same verdict on their own. The domain also appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so other researchers are tracking it too. PhishDestroy is the only blocklist in our set that lists it.
The domain was registered on 2023-03-23 through Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu, more than three years before PhishDestroy detected it. That long gap points to a name that was held or reused before it was turned against Top4top users, not one spun up for a single campaign. The site runs on Hostinger International Limited's network (AS47583) in Germany, ordinary shared-hosting infrastructure that blends in with countless legitimate sites.
If you downloaded anything through top4top.me, do not open it. Delete it and run a full malware scan on the device. If you typed a username, email or password into the site, change that password everywhere you reuse it and turn on two-factor authentication. Use the genuine Top4top service only by typing its address yourself, not through shared links. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level. They should also search logs for past visits and for files downloaded via the redirect, and treat links to it in chats or email as phishing.
ns1.dns-parking.comns2.dns-parking.comLocation describes the IP network.
c920d911fc995532c85128f26a83f2f92034fd7ce0d4a162742d23a4df506b2bwww.top4top.meSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
a.top4top.meDomain recordblog.top4top.meDomain recordwww.top4top.meDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of top4top.me · checked Oct 7, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
redirect: raw=redirect_302; http=302; via=https_proxy; location=https://top4top.me/ar; server=hcdn
top4top.me
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→redirected
http_redirect
protected→redirected
http_redirect
未知→protected
captcha · challenge
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
6→7
未知→redirected
http_redirect
5→6
未知→redirected
http_redirect
可访问
No threat flag
View source4 community references
View source7/92 engine detections
View sourcetop4top.me
View sourcePage captured
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
top4top.me)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.