VirusTotal
8 / 92 engine detections
打开报告“Ledger Restaurant”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@registrar.eu.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 11 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
冒充 Ledger: soft-ledger.org — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 8/92 (CRDF, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft); URLScan malicious…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
8 / 92 engine detections
打开报告Suspicious
打开报告DBL_PHISH
恶意
打开报告Scan report
打开报告no community references
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
soft-ledger.org is an impersonation phishing page that borrows the Ledger name to reach owners of Ledger hardware wallets. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-08, and it was still online and serving content when last checked on 2026-10-19. The page title reads "Ledger Restaurant," which does not match a wallet brand, but urlscan.io detected Ledger branding and we classify the site as Ledger impersonation.
Fake Ledger sites usually claim the visitor's device needs a firmware update, a security check or a wallet "sync," then ask for the 24-word recovery phrase or prompt them to connect a wallet. Ledger never asks for a recovery phrase on a website. Anyone who types those words in hands over full control of every account derived from them. The attacker can then empty the wallet from any device, and the hardware wallet gives no protection once the seed is exposed.
Independent sources back the classification. On 2026-10-12, 8 of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: CRDF, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky, SOCRadar and URLQuery. That is a modest count, but it includes several major vendors. urlscan.io rated the page malicious and identified Ledger as the imitated brand. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as phishing, and it appears on the MetaMask and SEAL blocklists as well as PhishDestroy's.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-28 through Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu, only ten days before we detected it. That short gap is typical of throwaway phishing domains. The site sits behind Cloudflare, Inc. on a Canada-located address, which hides the actual origin server. It uses a free Let's Encrypt certificate, so the browser padlock only shows an encrypted connection and says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
If you entered your recovery phrase on soft-ledger.org, treat that wallet as compromised. Reset your Ledger with a new seed and move any remaining funds to the new addresses at once, before the attacker does. If you connected a wallet or signed anything, review and revoke token approvals with a reputable approval checker. Only manage your device through Ledger's official app. Security teams should block the domain at DNS and proxy level, enforce Spamhaus DBL listings, and warn users that no legitimate service ever asks for a recovery phrase.
Last checked
Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
jaxson.ns.cloudflare.comkara.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
5a18bfd0cbfaa72ea0b3248810c9f27f945e50369037ed53d9b184f4586bb8faSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.soft-ledger.orgDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of soft-ledger.org · checked Oct 8, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=cloudflare
soft-ledger.org
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
不可用→可访问
可访问→不可用
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source8/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261008-5410E7
Page captured
View sourcesoft-ledger.org
View source已存储 151 个仿冒域名
显示 151 个中的 100 个
PD-20261008-5410E7 Recipient: abuse@registrar.eu 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
soft-ledger.org)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.