VirusTotal
12 / 91
“Microsoft Account”
secure.link-it.online — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 301). 品牌冒充:Microsoft; 诈骗类型:Impersonation. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 12/91 (BitDefender, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data); URLScan malicious verdict; Google Safe Browsing flagged; CF Radar malicious; PhishDestroy score 100/100. 注册商: NameCheap.
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
On 2026-10-01, secure.link-it.online returned an HTTP 404 response, a recorded status that describes that single response rather than the domain's full content. The same domain appears in one external blocklist, PhishFeed, and in a phishdestroy internal listing.
Google Safe Browsing flagged secure.link-it.online for social engineering on 2026-10-01. VirusTotal recorded 12 detections across 91 scanners on 2026-09-29. PhishFeed listed the domain, and the phishdestroy internal listing was also recorded. The domain was first observed on 2026-09-29, and its HTTP response was checked on 2026-10-01.
The named source observations describe different kinds of records rather than a single consistent signal. Safe Browsing's social engineering flag and the PhishFeed listing are separate source records, while the VirusTotal detection count reflects its own scanner set on its own date. The first-observed date and the HTTP check date are close, but the records do not establish that any source measured the domain at the same time.
Preserve the Safe Browsing flag, the PhishFeed listing, and the phishdestroy internal listing for secure.link-it.online as separate records. Compare those source records against future observations of the domain, and review the HTTP response record alongside them. Treat each source record according to its own scope rather than merging them into one conclusion.
针对该主机的爬虫与浏览器观察记录,以及针对“Keitaro”式流量分配系统的实时指纹检测。
nginx/1.10.3 (Ubuntu)扫描说明: redirect: raw=redirect_301; http=301; via=http_proxy; location=https://secure.link-it.online/; server=nginx/1.10.3 (Ubuntu)
For the registrable domain link-it.online behind this subdomain, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns2.registrar-servers.comLocation describes the IP network.
909097c1e9658061995d7f7eb57dd970ddcbd156340800f8783b31211704a6bcSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
54.174.73.204. 17 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent