VirusTotal
15 / 91 engine detections
打开报告“SAXO”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is complaint@gname.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
钓鱼: saxo-jp.net — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 15/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker); URLQuery 1 alert…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
15 / 91 engine detections
打开报告1 threat-system alert
打开报告DBL_PHISH
5 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS4EU | saxo-jp.net |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
saxo-jp.net is an impersonation phishing page that presents itself under the title "SAXO" and borrows the identity of the Saxo trading and investment brand. The "-jp" in the name points at Japanese-speaking investors. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-15, and as of 2026-10-19 the site was still online with its phishing content live.
Sites like this copy the look and name of a trusted broker so visitors believe they are on the real platform. The goal is usually to capture login credentials, identity documents or one-time codes, or to steer victims into funding an "account" on what is actually the attacker's interface. Money deposited into such a clone does not reach a real brokerage. Stolen logins can then be replayed against genuine accounts.
Fifteen of 91 VirusTotal engines marked the domain malicious on 2026-09-25, including BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Gridinsoft, CRDF and alphaMountain.ai. That is a solid spread of independent vendors for a site only weeks old. Spamhaus lists it in its DBL under the phishing category. The MetaMask and SEAL blocklists carry it alongside PhishDestroy. Five AlienVault OTX threat pulses reference the domain.
The domain was registered through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. on 2026-09-04, just eleven days before PhishDestroy caught it. That short gap is typical of throwaway domains stood up for a specific campaign. The site sits behind Cloudflare, which hides the real origin server; the edge address geolocates to Canada. Its certificate comes from Google Trust Services, so the padlock in the browser says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
If you entered a Saxo username or password here, change it immediately through the official Saxo app or the address you normally type yourself, and reset two-factor authentication. Also change the password anywhere you reused it. If you sent money or uploaded ID documents, contact your bank and the real Saxo support right away and keep any receipts or chat logs. Ignore any later request for "fees" to release funds. Defenders should block saxo-jp.net at DNS and proxy level, apply the Spamhaus DBL feed, and alert users who trade with Saxo to the lookalike domain.
Last checked
Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
amy.ns.cloudflare.comcleo.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
30fd955182ea6484c9fe99e87e7a57d5f53f14ce2ec4bfa987a17b92d3776642Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of saxo-jp.net · checked Sep 15, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
saxo-jp.net
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
可访问
5 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source15/91 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260915-11B88B
Page captured
View sourcesaxo-jp.net
View sourcePD-20260915-11B88B Recipient: complaint@gname.com Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
saxo-jp.net)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.