quicknode.zikaoe.com is an impersonation phishing page that borrows the QuickNode name, a well-known blockchain infrastructure brand, in its hostname to appear legitimate to crypto developers and Web3 users. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-10-17. As of 2026-10-19 the site was alive and still serving content, so it remains an active risk.
How the scam works
Impersonation pages like this copy the look and wording of a trusted service so visitors believe they are on the real platform. The hostname puts a familiar brand in front of an unrelated parent domain, a common trick for passing a quick glance in a link or search result. The page itself carries only the generic title "Home", which does not name a brand, while we classify the site as an impersonation. Victims of this type of scheme are typically pushed to sign in, enter account details or API credentials, or hand over a wallet recovery phrase or private key, and anything submitted goes straight to the operators.
Evidence
urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict for the page. VirusTotal coverage is still thin: only 2 of 92 engines, CRDF and Ermes, flagged it at the 2026-10-17 check, so a clean result from most scanners should not be read as proof of safety. The domain is listed on the PhishDestroy, MetaMask and SEAL blocklists, which matters because MetaMask and SEAL focus specifically on threats to crypto users.
Infrastructure
The parent domain zikaoe.com was registered on 2009-03-18 through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. The site resolves to 95.40.116.4 on Amazon.com, Inc. network space located in Hong Kong. Its TLS certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt (YR2), so the browser padlock only shows that the connection is encrypted and says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
What to do
If you visited the page and typed in a password or API key, change it on the genuine service right away, rotate any exposed keys and turn on two-factor authentication. If you entered a wallet recovery phrase or private key, treat that wallet as compromised and move any remaining funds to a newly created wallet whose phrase has never been typed into a website. Reach official services only through bookmarks or addresses you type yourself, never through links in messages or ads. Defenders should block the domain and its IP at the DNS, proxy and email gateway level, search logs for any user traffic to it, and report it to the hosting provider and registrar for takedown.
颁发者 Let's Encrypt / YR2· stored validity ends in 74 days
Network & certificates
Stored technical evidence
Network & DNS
Resolved IP
95.40.116.4
Network ASN
AS16509
Organization
AWS EC2 (ap-east-1)
Observed location
Hong Kong, HK
Server header
nginx
域名服务器 2
a12.share-dns.com
b12.share-dns.net
Location describes the IP network.
TLS 证书
Issuer
Let's Encrypt / YR2
Valid from
2026-10-05 10:43:34
Valid until
2027-01-03 10:43:33
Hostname coverage
Certificate hostname mismatch
Validity
Within stored validity dates
Collection time
2026-10-17 04:02:04 UTC
Collection source
PhishDestroy collector
Certificate fingerprintf7b640e137a81204c2a47f4165b06dfe29661838d049d9cfbae731523dcd9ec9Certificate names · 4 SANs
quicknode.fhlac.com
quicknode.miutone.com
quicknode.vhuatu.com
quicknode.yiguk.com
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非活动reason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation未知Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 22:48:06 UTC
RDAP registration未知
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 02:30:23 UTClast content: 2026-10-19 02:30:23 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-10-20 08:21:37 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-10-19 02:30:23 UTC → 2026-10-20 08:21:37 UTC · 29.85hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-10-19 17:26:00 UTC · precision medium · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
威胁情报交叉核验 · source references
ScamAdviserPublic lookup
A public ScamAdviser lookup is available. Review its current score and warnings at the source; the existence of a lookup page is not itself a malicious verdict.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
AI辅助草稿——事件详细信息由AI提供商处理 · 自行审核并提交
After a phishing incident
针对受害者的建议与指导
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
我应该立即采取什么措施？
紧急
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
更改所有密码 — 电子邮件、Exchange 账户，以及任何使用同一密码的账户
启用双因素认证 使用身份验证器应用（而非短信）。禁用基于短信的恢复功能
冻结卡片 如果您在钓鱼网站上输入了银行信息
我应该为报告收集哪些信息？
联邦调查局（FBI）指南
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
当地警方 — 即使无法立即采取行动，也能留下正式记录
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
How do phishing scams typically work?
虚假网站 — 与正规网站完全一致的克隆网站，仅域名略有改动
猪的屠宰 — 通过Telegram/WhatsApp/交友软件花数周时间建立信任，随后钱被骗走
退款诈骗 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(CN)
